Data in Brief
Elsevier
image
Panel Dataset of Ethical Commitment Disclosures in Malaysia
Volume: 30
DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105624
  • PDF   
  • XML   
  •       
Abstract

Panel dataset in this article contains information on the ethical commitment disclosures of Malaysian publicly listed companies. The data presented is related to the research article entitled “Ethical Practice Disclosure of Malaysian Public Listed Companies” [1]. In examining the level of ethical commitment disclosures, content analysis is performed involving 1,115 annual reports for five year periods (2012 – 2016). The annual reports are gathered from Main Market of Bursa Malaysia website. Information on ethical commitment disclosures are extracted from the annual reports. The data are collected using Ethical Commitment Index (ECI) comprising six themes; corporate ethics values, action to promote ethics, whistle-blowing policy, code of ethics, sustainability practices, and ethics committee. This dataset is useful as an indicator of the companies’ ethical commitment reflecting ethical climate in Malaysian public listed companies.

Keywords
Hashim, Abidin, Salleh, and Devi: Panel Dataset of Ethical Commitment Disclosures in Malaysia

Specifications Table

SubjectBusiness, Management and Accounting (General)
Specific subject areaBusiness ethics
Type of dataTable
Graph
How data were acquiredCompanies’ annual report downloaded from Main market in Bursa Malaysia, Content analysis from companies’ annual reporting, Data gathered using extended Ethical Commitment Index [1].
Data formatRaw
Filtered
Parameters for data collectionNon-financial companies listed in Main board of Bursa Malaysia. Companies with missing data and/or annual report are excluded.
Description of data collectionContent analysis of 223 companies’ annual reports for five years observations (2012-2016), total 1,115 companies annual report
Data source locationMalaysia
Data accessibilityWith the article, and

Repository: Mendeley Data https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/4pnd65dpnh/draft?a=8d4746a9-173b-4dc3-a2c4-4456f2f19be5
Related research articleAhmad Firdhauz Zainul Abidin, Hafiza Aishah Hashim, Zalailah Saleh, S.Susela Devi, Ethical Practice Disclosure of Malaysian Public Listed Companies, in FGIC 2nd Conference on Governance and Integrity 2019, KnE Social Sciences, pages 1168–1201. DOI 10.18502/kss.v3i22.5119 [1]

Value of the data

    • The dataset provides preliminary data on various attributes of ethical commitment/practices disclosed by Malaysian companies.
    • The dataset is useful for companies and policy makers to assess the level of ethical commitment disclosures of companies and implement action plans to improve the ethic practices.
    • The dataset can be used as part of corporate governance framework and have a potential to be used toward different model in evaluating corporate values.

Data Description

The dataset contains 223 companies (1,115 observations) from twelve sector in Main Market of Bursa Malaysia listings as in Table 1. The study applied a systematic random sampling approach to select companies using Microsoft Excel to obtain a sample that appears to be representative of the population. Table 2 presents the original instrument to measure the ethical commitment originally developed by Choi and Jung [2]. Extended version of ECI are presented in Table 3 with modifications made by adding 9 additional items and aggregate all the items into six themes that resulted in final 20 items to be used in calculating ECI score. The index was modified and adapted to suit Malaysian corporate environment. Fig. 1 presents the level of ethical commitment disclosures based on the percentage of companies disclosing each items from ECI for five years’ observations (2012 to 2016). The level of each themes of ECI are presented in Fig. 2. In supplementary materials provided, the file is about the list of sample companies with their industry-sectors and binary score for each items, together with the total ECI scores for each company. Each sheets in the excel represent years.

Table 1
Descriptive statistics for company sector in Bursa Malaysia for year (2012 to 2016).
SECTOR BURSAFreq. (companies)Percent (%)Cum.
Construction sector605.385.38
Consumer products & services sector24021.5226.91
Energy sector454.0430.94
Health care sector353.1434.08
Industrial products & services sector36032.2966.37
Plantations655.8372.2
Property14012.5684.75
Real estate252.2487
Technology454.0491.03
Telecommunications & media302.6993.72
Transportations & logistics sector554.9398.65
Utilities151.35100
Total1,115100
Table 2
Original ECI developed by Choi and Jung [2].
Description
1. Top managers of this company regularly emphasize the importance of business ethics
2. Ethical behaviour based on a formal business philosophy is the norm of this company
3. This company has a disciplinary system through which unethical behaviour is strictly punished
4. This company has a code of ethics
5. In this company, employees can report unethical conduct through an anonymous channel
6. In this company, ethics education, training, or workshops are in place to enhance business ethics of employees
7. This company regularly puts a significant portion of its profits toward philanthropy
8. This company has an independent ethics department and officers
9. In this company, employees can get help regarding business ethics through an ethics hotline or open communication channel
10. This company has an ethics committee
11. This company has an ethics evaluation system measured by an independent party from outside the company
Table 3
Extended ECI.
ThemesItemsDescriptions
CEV1Top managers of this company regularly emphasise on the importance of business ethics
2This company has ethics philosophies and ethical values
3This company is committed towards the highest standard of business practices
ACT4This company has a disciplinary system in which unethical behaviour is strictly punished
5This company provides training, workshops, and education-related ethics towards employees
6This company has employee appraisal programmes to promote ethical conduct
WBP7This company establishes the whistleblowing policies
8This company has an open communication channel for employees to assist with ethical issues
9This company has whistle-blower protections
10This company provides whistleblowing policies in the website
CODE11This company has formulated the code of ethics
12This company uses formal and informal methods to communicate the code of ethics
13This company has implemented a system to ensure the compliance of the code of ethics
14This company has revised its code of ethics periodically
15Code of ethics is available in company websites
SUST16This company is committed to sustainability practices
17This company regularly invested a significant portion of profits to philanthropy
18The sustainability practice report of this company is available in the website
ETH19This company has an ethics committee
20This company has an independent ethics department and officers
The level of ethical commitment disclosures (N=1115).
Fig. 1
The level of ethical commitment disclosures (N=1115).
The level for each theme disclosed for five year observations.
Fig. 2
The level for each theme disclosed for five year observations.

Experimental Design, Materials, and Methods

The dataset represents 223 companies randomly selected from Bursa Malaysia main board after excluding financial sectors and missing data and/or annual reports. The dataset consists of 1,115 companies for five year observations from year 2012 to year 2016. Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics for twelve companies’ sector involved (real estate, technology, telecommunications & media, transportations & logistics, utilities, energy, health care, constructions and plantation).

Table 2 presents the explanations of all themes and items of ethical commitment index. ECI previously developed by Choi and Jung [2] are extended by incorporating the perspective of Malaysian corporate environment to measure companies’ ethical commitment. The development of ECI was based on previous literatures [3], [4], [5] and MCCG recommendations. The basic of ECI was constructed based on formal methods such as code of ethics, ethics training, ethics evaluation, ethics committee and officers to promote ethics in company [3]. As there is no standard measure, ECI in Table 2 were extended by adding 9 items and aggregated each item into 6 themes (Table 3). The themes in the extended ECI include corporate ethics values and philosophy (CEV), actions to promote ethics and prevent unethical conduct (ACT), whistle-blowing policies (WBP), code of ethics (CODE), sustainability practices (SUST) and ethics committee (ETH). Data of each themes and items together with ECI score is provided in supplementary materials.

Binary scoring method is used to measure each item; whether disclosed or not. One (1) point is given for the disclosure of particular items in annual reports, and zero (0) point if no disclosure is made at all. Binary scoring was chosen due to the nature of the information gathered from each item in ECI that consists of six themes of ethics disclosures. Within each of the themes there are items that represent the detailed information of the themes, thus binary scoring allows information regarding ethics to be examined in depth [6]. In addition, this method allows determinations of companies into those that are committed toward ethics or not [7]. Data of ethical commitment disclosures are hand collected through content analysis.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have, or could be perceived to have, influenced the work reported in this article.

References

1 

    Abidin A.F.Z., Hashim H.A., Salleh Z., Devi S.S. Ethical Practice Disclosure of Malaysian Public Listed Companies, KnE Soc. Sciences 2019. , pp.1168-1201, doi: 10.18502/kss.v3i22.5119

2 

    Choi T.H., Jung J.. Ethical Commitment, Financial Performance, and Valuation: An Empirical Investigation of Korean Companies. J. Bus. Ethics. 81: 2008. , pp.447-463, doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9506-1

3 

    Schwartz M.S.. Developing and sustaining an ethical corporate culture: The core elements. Bus. Horizons 56: 2013. , pp.39-50, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2012.09.002

4 

    Trevino L.K., Nelson K.A.Managing business ethicssixth ed. 2013. John Wiley & Sons, Inc

5 

    Whyatt G., Wood G., Callaghan M.. Commitment to business ethics in UK organizations. European Bus. Rev 24: 2012. , pp.331-350, doi: 10.1108/09555341211242141

6 

    Sharif S.P., Lai M.M.. The effects of corporate disclosure practices on firm performance, risk and dividend policy. International J. of Discl. and Gov 12: 2015. , pp.311-326, doi: 10.1057/jdg.2015.2

7 

    Bezares F.G., Przychodzen W., Przychodzen J.. Bridging the gap: How sustainable development can help companies create shareholder value and improve financial performance. Bus. Ethics: A European Rev 26: 2017. , pp.1-17, doi: 10.1111/beer.12135

Acknowledgments

The study is supported by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) (vote no: 59468) provided by the Ministry of Education Malaysia. The authors would like to thank the Ministry for the support.