BMJ Open
BMJ Publishing Group
Help-seeking behaviour and attitudes towards internet-administered psychological support among adolescent and young adults previously treated for cancer during childhood: protocol for a survey and embedded qualitative interview study in Sweden

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041350, Volume: 11, Issue: 4, Pages: 0-0
Article Type: other, Article History


A subgroup of adolescent and young adult childhood cancer survivors (AYACCS) are at increased risk of psychological distress. Despite this, AYACCS experience difficulties accessing psychological support. E-mental health (e-MH) may offer a solution to reduce this treatment gap. However, research examining e-MH for AYACCS has experienced difficulties with recruitment, retention and adherence. Such difficulties may relate to: (1) help-seeking behaviour and/or (2) e-MH acceptability. The overall study aims are to: (1) examine potential associations between health service use factors, informed by Andersen’s behavioural model of health services use, and help-seeking behaviour; (2) examine attitudes towards e-MH interventions; and (3) explore perceived need for mental health support; past experience of receiving mental health support; preferences for support; and barriers and facilitators to help-seeking.

Methods and analysis

An online and paper-based cross-sectional self-report survey (98 items) and embedded qualitative interview study across Sweden, with a target sample size of n=365. Participants are aged 16–39 years, diagnosed with cancer when 0–18 years and have completed successful cancer treatment. The survey examines sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, actual help-seeking behaviour, attitudes towards e-MH, stigma of mental illness, mental health literacy, social support and current symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. Survey respondents with past and/or current experience of mental health difficulties are invited into the qualitative interview study to explore: (1) perceived need for mental health support; (2) past experience of receiving mental health support; (3) preferences for support; and (4) barriers and facilitators to help-seeking. Potential associations between health service use factors and help-seeking behaviour are examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions. Qualitative interviews are analysed using content analysis.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr: 2020-06271). Results will be disseminated in scientific publications and academic conference presentations.

Trial registration number


Woodford, Månberg, Cajander, Enebrink, Harila-Saari, Hagström, Karlsson, Placid Solimena, and von Essen: Help-seeking behaviour and attitudes towards internet-administered psychological support among adolescent and young adults previously treated for cancer during childhood: protocol for a survey and embedded qualitative interview study in Sweden
Strengths and limitations of this study
  • The mixed methods design may aid a rich and insightful understanding of the investigated phenomena.
  • Results may be used to inform the development of acceptable, relevant, and accessible mental health interventions for adolescent and young adult childhood cancer survivors.
  • Reasons for not receiving a mental health intervention are not explored and only those who report receiving support in the past 6 months are defined as help-seeking.
  • This approach may exclude adolescent and young adult childhood cancer survivors who have attempted to seek formal help (help-seeking) but did not receive help.
  • No conclusions concerning cause and effect can be drawn given the cross-sectional design.


Medical improvements have resulted in an overall 5-year survival rate of 81.2% from cancer diagnosed during childhood (0–18 years) in Northern Europe.1 However, significant challenges, such as late effects, remain after treatment completion.2 3 Survivors of childhood cancer report a number of long-term adverse physical and developmental outcomes4–6 and social and economic impacts, including poorer educational and occupational achievements.7 8 A further common late effect is symptoms of psychological distress, for example, post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression, symptoms of which have been found to persist decades postdiagnosis.9–11 Difficulties with psychological distress are further complicated given that adolescence is a period of increased vulnerability to mental health problems,12 with difficulties such as depression and anxiety commonly first appearing before 24 years of age.13 Indeed, individuals diagnosed with cancer during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood have been found to be at an increased likelihood of being prescribed hypnotics and anxiolytics14 15 of using antidepressant medication over the long-term,16 and are at an elevated risk of suicide.17 As such, adolescent and young adult childhood cancer survivors (AYACCS), commonly defined as cancer survivors diagnosed during childhood currently aged between 15 and 39 years,18 are particularly vulnerable to experiencing adverse psychological and social outcomes, and there is a significant need for long-term care and support.5 However, despite a clear need for the provision of mental health support, a mental health treatment gap remains, with few AYACCS being offered professional psychological support.19–22 Reasons for this treatment gap may pertain to a lack of qualified healthcare professionals, poor service provision, geographical barriers23 and public stigma (eg, the general public holding negative beliefs about cancer survivors, eg, being less competent).24

E-mental health (e-MH), defined as the provision of psychological support via information technology and new media (eg, online, smartphone applications, video conferencing),25 may represent a solution to reduce the mental health treatment gap.26 One example of e-MH is internet-administered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT). ICBT has been found to be effective for a range of common mental health difficulties, such as depression and anxiety,27 including for young adult populations28 and has been found to be as effective as traditional face-to-face CBT.29 e-MH interventions may help overcome practical barriers associated with accessing traditional face-to-face psychological support (eg, geographical, financial and time-related barriers)30 that have been observed within the AYACCS population.31 Furthermore, e-MH is associated with anonymity and privacy32 thus potentially overcoming barriers associated with public stigma. Indeed, research has identified that the provision of e-MH interventions may be a potential solution for the AYACCS population.33–38 However, research examining e-MH support for an AYACCS population has encountered challenges with recruitment, attrition, and internet use.34 38 For example, one study examining the feasibility and acceptability of e-MH recruited only 28 participants over a 12-month period and experienced almost 30% attrition.38 Another feasibility study of e-MH for adolescents and young adults who had experienced cancer during the adolescent period recruited only 6 participants from a total of 320 potential participants invited into the study, and experienced a 100% attrition rate.34 Indeed, a recent review of e-Health interventions for AYACCS concluded that engaging the population was challenging, and there is currently a lack of literature concerning how to better engage the population.36 However, challenges with recruitment, attrition and internet use are common in the field of e-MH research.39–41 Potentially, challenges with recruitment, attrition and internet use may be related to help-seeking behaviour and the acceptability of e-MH for the population.

Help-seeking behaviour

Low rates of formal help-seeking behaviour for mental health difficulties is common among an adolescent and young adult population in general.42 A number of potential barriers to help-seeking have been identified, including stigma, embarrassment, and poor mental health literacy (MHL).43 44 AYACCS report difficulties with stigma and alienation in relation to the cancer disease45 and as such may be reluctant to identify themselves as experiencing mental health difficulties. Furthermore, while social support has been found to facilitate help-seeking behaviour for mental health difficulties in adolescent and young adult populations,43 AYACCS commonly report difficulties with social withdrawal and loneliness.46 47 However, at present there is a lack of research concerning help-seeking behaviour for mental health difficulties experienced by an AYACCS population.

A frequently used approach for identifying factors associated with help-seeking is Andersen’s behavioural model of health services use behaviour.48 The model hypothesises a number of factors to be associated with help-seeking behaviour: (1) predisposing factors including sociodemographic variables (eg, age and gender), and health-related beliefs and knowledge49; (2) enabling factors relating to logistical elements to receiving care and resources (eg, financial factors and social support)50; (3) external environmental factors (eg, location); and (4) need-related factors (eg, symptoms of psychological distress). Recently, the model has been adopted to examine factors associated with accessing both traditional and e-MH services within a young adult (aged 18–39 years) population.32 Interestingly, the study identified a weaker utilisation of e-MH by young people who had experienced negative childhood experiences during childhood (eg, family conflict, bullying or lack of affection).32 This finding is of particular importance seeing that negative experiences of childhood are normally associated with increased mental healthcare utilisation.51 Furthermore, given evidence to suggest some AYACCS may experience bullying related to their cancer experience52 and poor family functioning for example conflict,53 it may be important to examine whether negative childhood experiences are associated with reduced mental healthcare utilisation in an AYACCS population. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, Andersen’s behavioural model of health services use has not yet been applied to an AYACCS population and factors associated with help-seeking in the population remain unclear.


While adolescents appear to consider e-MH interventions to be potentially acceptable, they still report a preference for face-to-face over e-MH interventions.54 Indeed, there is some indication e-MH resources are not widely accessed by young people.55 One potential difficulty may be related to what has been coined the ‘technology push’ , whereby e-MH solutions are designed to fit available technology, rather than to meet the unmet needs and preferences of end-users.56 Furthermore, research indicates poor uptake and ongoing use of e-MH interventions that have been implemented into healthcare settings within the general population.57 As such, there is a need to understand preferences and attitudes towards e-MH interventions within specific populations, via both quantitative and qualitative research, to inform future e-MH developments.58 To the best of our knowledge, there has been no exploration to date of the attitudes and preferences towards e-MH interventions within an AYACCS population. In addition, tailoring e-MH interventions to specific patient groups has been associated with increased effectiveness59 and adherence.60 Rates of attrition may be reduced, and adherence increased, if the perspective of the population using the intervention is taken into account when developing e-MH interventions.61 Furthermore, research into the psychological needs of an AYACCS population indicates a need for increased focus on the specific psychological and psychosocial needs of the population to enable to provision of more tailored support to the cancer experience.62 As such, there is need to explore AYACCS general preferences for psychological support, including potential intervention content.

Study aims and research questions

The overall aims of the study are to: (1) examine potential associations between health service use factors, informed by Andersen’s behavioural model of health services use, and help-seeking behaviour; (2) examine attitudes towards e-MH interventions; and (3) explore perceived need and past experiences of mental health support, preferences for support, and barriers and facilitators to help-seeking. Specifically, the following research questions will be examined:

    • Are there associations between predisposing, enabling, environmental, and needs-related health service use factors, informed by Andersen’s behavioural model of health, and help-seeking behaviour within an AYACCS population?
    • What attitudes are held by an AYACCS population towards e-MH interventions?
    • What is the perceived need for mental health support within an AYACCS population?
    • What are AYACCS experiences of past receipt of cancer-specific and non-cancer-specific mental health support?
    • What preferences do an AYACCS population hold towards mental health support related to their cancer experience?
    • What are the barriers and facilitators do an AYACCS population experience seeking help for mental health support related to their cancer experience?

Method and analysis

Study design

An online and paper-based, cross-sectional, self-report survey and embedded qualitative interview study across Sweden. The study has been registered in the ISRCTN clinical trial registry (ISRCTN70570236).

Eligibility criteria

Eligible participants will: (1) be an adolescent or young adult, aged 16–39 years, at study start; (2) have been diagnosed with childhood cancer when 0–18 years; (3) have completed successful cancer treatment (including relapses) at a minimum 3 months ago according to self-report; (4) be able to read and write in Swedish; and (5) currently reside in Sweden.


A multifaceted approach to recruitment will be adopted, using two main strategies.

Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry

Personal identification numbers of AYACCS will be obtained from the Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry (National Quality Registry, initiated in 1982). Next, addresses will be obtained via NAVET, a population registry held by the Swedish Tax Agency. NAVET is continuously updated with important information about the Swedish population, including deaths and can, as such, provide current addresses and information concerning the vital status of AYACCS. The Swedish Tax Agency will provide this information via a secure online file transfer system (e-transport) on the same day information is requested by the study team. Study invitation letters will be sent to AYACCS on the same day that information is provided via e-transport in order to minimise the likelihood of inviting a deceased AYACCS. AYACCS will be invited to participate by the study team on a weekly basis, using blocks of 100 until the target sample size has been reached. Blocks will be selected randomly, with minimisation used to ensure balance between factors that may affect outcomes: sex (male; female); current age (16–24 years; 25–39 years); and age at diagnosis (0–12 years; 13–18 years).

Study invitation packs sent to home addresses will include a study invitation letter, study information, a link to the online survey via the U-CARE portal (, a secure internet research platform to support data collection and provision of e-MH interventions,63 and a study log-in code. All potential participants identified via the Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry and invited via mail-out will be provided with a link to the online survey on the U-CARE portal and a study log-in code. In addition, given evidence to suggest the provision of choice between web-based and paper-based surveys can increase survey response rates among childhood cancer survivors,64 we will include a paper-based survey and freepost envelope with each invitation letter.

Technology-based approaches

Considering that response rates to mail-out surveys have declined over the past two decades,65 we will also use technology-based recruitment approaches shown to be effective.66 Indeed, social media recruitment is successful in recruiting young adult cancer survivor (aged 20–35 years) populations.67 Specifically, we will identify community-based organisations and support groups with an online presence for AYACCS in Sweden. Examples may include: the Swedish Cancer Foundation and Childhood Cancer Foundation and Young Cancer. Organisations and support groups will be asked to place advertisements on their websites; distribute advertisements via e-mail lists and e-newsletters; and post advertisements on social networking sites (eg, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram).

Each online advertisement will include brief study information, a link to the online survey on the U-CARE-portal, and a study log-in code unique to each organisation and technologically based recruitment type to allow for the examination of success of each technology-based recruitment strategy. Organisations and support groups using social media will be encouraged to re-post the advertisement at regular intervals following evidence suggesting that re-posting is required to meet recruitment targets.68

Sample size estimation

The Swedish Childhood Cancer Registry has some 9880 Swedish persons diagnosed when 0–18 years registered since 1982. However, some will have been classified as having a benign tumour, some have been registered twice and some will be deceased. As such, the number of potentially eligible cases will be lower and estimated to be approximately 5745. Sample size calculation indicated that a minimum of 365 participants would be required, with a power of 0.9 and p<0.05 (two-tailed). Assuming a response rate of approximately 40%, as indicated by a systematic review of participation rates in self-administered questionnaire studies with childhood cancer survivors,69 we estimate inviting 913 potential participants to achieve the required sample size.


Online survey

Potential participants accessing the survey via the U-CARE-portal will be presented with study information in both text and video format. Participants will not be offered any financial reimbursements for taking part in the survey. Those interested will be able to log into the U-CARE portal using a study log-in code and will need to identify themselves via mobile telephone and/or Bank ID (a citizen authentication system). Potential participants will then be able to provide informed consent online and will be presented with brief screening questions asking for: (1) date of birth; (2) age when diagnosed with cancer; (3) date of last cancer treatment completed; (4) able to read and write in Swedish (yes/no); and (5) whether currently residing in Sweden (yes/no). Eligible participants will be provided access to the online survey (see ‘Survey items’ section). The online survey will be open for a period of 6 weeks. Each item completed in the survey is auto-saved and participants are able to select ‘save and continue later’ if they wish to return to the survey before submitting. On completion of the survey, a purposive sample of participants with past and/or present experience of mental health difficulties will be invited to take part in an interview (see ‘Embedded qualitative interview study’ section for further details). These participants will be provided with study information and online consent form, as well as asked to provide contact details.

Paper-based survey

Potential participants receiving study invitation via mail-out will be able to complete a paper-based survey. The survey includes a written consent form and brief screening questions as the online survey. Participants can return the paper-based survey to the study team using the freepost envelope provided in the study invitation pack. In addition, participants will be asked to provide consent if they agree to be contacted about participation in an interview study.


Reminder study invitation packs will be resent at 2 and 6 weeks after sending the initial study invitation to AYACCS who do respond to the study invitation. It will be clearly stated in the study information sheet that reminder letters will be sent to non-responders. In addition, participants who consent to complete the online survey will receive reminders via SMS and email to complete the survey at 4 weeks, 2 weeks and 2 days prior to the survey closing.

Survey items

An online and paper-based survey, consisting of 98 items in Swedish. The survey comprises eight subsections: (1) sociodemographic characteristics (11 items); (2) clinical cancer-related characteristics (3 items); (3) actual help-seeking behaviour (2 items); (4) attitudes towards internet-administered interventions (17 items); (5) stigma of mental illness (5 items); (6) MHL (26 items); (7) social support (12 items); and (8) current symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress (21 items). One open question at the end of the survey offers and opportunity to provide any further information concerning emotional distress and preferences for support after childhood cancer. Potential predisposing, enabling, environmental, and need-related factors examined with the survey are summarised in table 1.

Table 1
Factors to be examined as per Andersen’s behavioural model of health services use
Andersen’s behavioural model of health services useFactors*
PredisposingSex (male/female/other)
Age (16–24/25–39)
Time since first cancer treatment (years)
Place of birth (born in Sweden/born outside of Sweden)
Childhood negative events (yes/no)
Level of education (≤upper secondary school/>upper secondary school)
Public stigma (Stigma Scale for Receiving Psychological Help)
Mental health literacy
EnablingType of cancer (leukaemia/central nervous system tumour/solid tumour/lymphoma/other)
Relationship status
Employment status (yes/no/studying)
Social support (12-item Interpersonal Support Evaluation List)
Need-relatedSymptoms of depression (DASS-21 depression subscale)
Symptoms of anxiety (DASS-21 anxiety subscale)
Symptoms of stress (DASS-21 stress subscale)
Self-reported experience of mental health difficulties in past 6 months (yes/no)
EnvironmentalRegion of Sweden (south/mid/north)
Rural or urban area
Actual help-seeking behaviour (dependent variable)Receipt of mental health support in the past 6 months
Type of mental health support received in the past 6 months (formal/technology/informal)
*Outcomes selected informed by previous research.32 42 50 70
DASS-21, Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale.

Sociodemographic characteristics

Data on the following background and sociodemographic characteristics will be collected: (1) sex; (2) relationship status; (3) having children or not; (4) Swedish county of residence; (5) living in urban or rural area; (6) level of education; (7) employment status; (8) place of birth; (9) mother’s place of birth; (10) father’s place of birth; and (11) childhood negative events (bullying, family conflict, lack of affection).

Clinical cancer-related characteristics

The following clinical characteristics related to cancer will be collected: (1) type of cancer (leukaemia, central nervous system tumour, solid tumour, lymphoma or other malignancy); (2) number of relapses (0, 1 or >1); and (3) current late effects of cancer (multiple choice listed).

Actual help-seeking behaviour

The following items will be used to examine actual help-seeking behaviour: (1) emotional health difficulties related to the childhood cancer experience; (2) the type of support received by those who accessed support in the past 6 months and/or in the past (not including the past 6 months): (a) face-to-face individual or group support from mental health professional; (b) face-to-face support from a general practitioner/family doctor; (c) technology-administered mental health support (eg, online therapy programme, smartphone application, video conferencing or teleconferencing); (d) technology-administered support from a general practitioner/family doctor (eg, online, video conferencing or teleconferencing); (e) social media support group; (f) phone help-line; (g) family, partner or friend/s; (h) religious leader; and (i) other. Type of support will be categorised into: (1) face-to-face professional support; (2) technology-administered professional support; and (3) informal support (social media support group, family, partner, friends and religious leader). Those who sought support for mental health difficulties in the past 6 months and received support from a health professional either face-to-face or technology assisted will be defined as ‘help-seeking’.70

Attitudes towards internet-administered interventions

The 17-item e-Therapy Attitudes Measure (ETAM)71 72 will be adopted to measure attitudes towards internet-administered interventions, however, for the purpose of the present study one item concerning health insurance companies was excluded due to not being relevant in the Swedish context. The questionnaire begins with definitions of three types of internet-administered interventions: (1) unguided internet-administered self-help programmes; (2) therapist-guided internet-administered self-help programmes; and (3) psychological therapy delivered via video conferencing. Subsequently, respondents are required to state which type of internet-administered intervention they would prefer, or state if they would not use internet-administered treatment at all. Subsequently, the ETAM is presented and explores attitudes towards internet-administered interventions. Specifically, respondents are instructed to state whether they agree with each statement on a 5-point rating scale ranging from 0 (‘strongly disagree’) to 4 (‘strongly agree’) and are asked to rate items considering therapist-guided internet-administered self-help programmes. The ETAM has been demonstrated to have good internal-consistency reliability (α=0.89).72

Symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress

The Swedish version73 of the (7-item depression, 7-item anxiety and 7-item stress subscales) Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21)74 75 will be adopted to examine symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress. The DASS-21 has adequate psychometric properties76 and satisfactory test–retest reliability,77 with support for the factor structure and convergent validity of the Swedish version.73

Stigma of mental illness

The 5-item Stigma Scale for Receiving Psychological Help (SSRPH)78 will be adopted to measure public stigma, that is, negative perceptions concerning the receipt of mental health services. The measure has demonstrated to be reliable and valid in studies with young adults79 and adolescents.80 Respondents rate degrees of agreement using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (‘strongly disagree’) to 3 (‘strongly agree’), with a higher score representing a higher level of stigma.

Social support

The 12-item Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL-12)81 will be adopted to examine perceptions of social support. Responses are provided on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (‘definitely false’) to 4 (‘definitely true’).

Mental health literacy

A 26-item multicomponent MHL measure, demonstrated to have good internal consistency (of 0.83 of the KR-20 coefficient=0.83),82 will be adopted to assess knowledge-oriented, beliefs-oriented and resource-oriented MHL. The first 22 items examining knowledge-orientated and beliefs-orientated MHL are answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (‘strongly disagree’) to 4 (‘strongly agree’) and the option of “I don’t know”. The response format for the final four items, examining resource-orientated MHL, is ‘yes’ or ‘no’.

Translation of English language outcome measurements into Swedish

Currently, there are no Swedish versions of the following outcome measurements: (1) ETAM, (3) SSRPH, (4) ISEL, and (5) MLH. The following steps will be taken to translate: (1) one clinical psychologist, native Swedish speaker with advanced knowledge of English, will translate each outcome measurement to Swedish and (2) translations will be reviewed, discussed and revised with a research assistant in our study team who is a native Swedish speaker with advanced knowledge of English. Professional back translation to English and discussion with the original author is out of scope for the present study due to time and resource limitations. However, permission to translate outcome measurements to Swedish will be sought.

Embedded qualitative interview study

An embedded qualitative interview study will be conducted to explore: (1) perceived need for mental health support; (2) past experience of receiving mental health support; (3) preferences for support; and (4) barriers and facilitators to help-seeking. As this study will be examining mental health help-seeking, only respondents meeting the following criteria will be invited into the study: (1) self-reported current and/or past experience of mental health difficulties during life time (yes) and/or (2) DASS-21 depression score ≥5 and/or (3) DASS-21 anxiety score ≥4 and/or DASS-21 stress score ≥8. Respondents will be provided with full study information and an online consent form. Respondents meeting these criteria will be invited consecutively until thematic data saturation is met.83 84 As the decision concerning whether data saturation has been met is made during the analytic process, it is difficult to determine the number of interviews a priori; however, we may anticipate interviewing approximately 20–30 participants.85 As we are interested in both barriers and facilitators to seeking help, we will endeavour to interview participants classified as help-seekers and non-help-seekers. For participants who send the consent form and reply slip via the post, those meeting the inclusion criteria will be contacted by the study team to provide full study information and obtain informed consent. Interviews will be conducted either via the telephone or a secure video conferencing system on the U-CARE portal. Interviews will be audio recorded with informed consent and transcribed with personal information removed. Participants will be informed about the recording and give approval when giving consent to the interview. An interview guide will be developed, consisting of open-ended questions, structured around the third research objective covering the following topics: (1) perceived need for mental health support; (2) past experience of receiving mental health support (formal/informal, cancer-specific/non-cancer-specific); (3) preferences for support (eg, type of support, emotional difficulties to be target and intervention content areas); and (4) barriers and facilitators to help-seeking behaviour (eg, perceived attitudes of peers, knowledge/information, economic resources, geographical location, stigma). The interview guide will be partially informed by emerging survey results and findings from studies examining help-seeking behaviour in young adults.32 42 50 70 Interviews are estimated to last 45–90 min.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses will be conducted using SPSS V.26.0 software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, 2019, Armonk, New York, USA). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics will be presented with descriptive statistics. The potential association between predicting factors as informed by Andersen’s behavioural model of health services use (predisposing, enabling, environmental, and need-related factors) and the dependent variable help-seeking behaviour, for example, receipt of mental health support in the past 6 months will be examined using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions.70 The non-help-seeking group will used as the reference group.70 First, univariable analyses will be conducted for each predictor separately. Variance inflation factor will be used to examine multicollinearity prior to the regression analysis. A multivariable logistic regression will be performed using stepwise manual backward selection procedure. All predictor variables will initially be included, and non-significant predictors will be eliminated with only variables significantly related to the dependent variable (p<0.05) retained. For both the univariable and multivariable logistic regressions, ORs will be presented, alongside 95% CIs, and p values. Given the heterogeneous nature of the study population, subgroup analysis will be performed by stratifying the population by age and sex. The same method of modelling will be used for the subgroup analyses for age (15–19 years vs 20–29 years vs 30–39 years) and sex (male vs female). The subgroup analysis will be exploratory and with results used to inform subsequent studies.

Qualitative analysis

Audio recordings will be transcribed verbatim. NVivo V.12 software (NVivo qualitative data analysis software, 2018; QSR International) will be used to assist data analysis. An inductive content analysis approach86 will be adopted to analyse transcriptions. Only manifest content will be analysed and the following steps will be undertaken: (1) each interview transcript will be read multiple times; (2) meaning units will be identified; (3) meaning units will be labelled using descriptive codes; and (4) codes will be sorted into themes and subthemes.86 To ensure trustworthiness,87 the following strategies will be adopted: (1) two members of the research team, one researcher with experience of qualitative research and one research assistant trained in qualitative research will analyse each interview separately with any discrepancies in analysis discussed; (2) discussion of emerging themes with the wider study team; (3) audit trails; (4) triangulation; and (5) disconfirming case analysis.88 Furthermore, extracts of data supporting each theme and subtheme will be presented to further improve the transparency of the analysis.89

Patient and public involvement

The protocol was developed without patient and public involvement (PPI). However, we will seek to involve AYACCS in pilot-testing the survey and in data interpretation of the content analysis of the embedded semi-structured interviews. Specifically, a consultation approach to PPI will be adopted90 in pilot-testing the survey and a panel of AYACCS research partners will be asked to complete the survey (online and paper based) and comment on the feasibility, acceptability, and relevancy of the survey. Furthermore, results of the content analysis will be presented to the panel to explore whether themes identified by the research team reflect their own experiences. The perspective of the AYACCS research partners will be incorporated into the interpretation of results and their involvement will be reported in accordance with Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public-short form.91


To the best of our knowledge, this study will be the first study to examine mental health help-seeking behaviour and attitudes towards e-MH support in an AYACCS population. Results will provide an understanding of: (1) potential associations between predisposing, enabling, environmental, needs-related health service use factors, and help-seeking behaviour; (2) attitudes towards e-MH; and (3) perceived need and preferences for mental health support, alongside barriers and facilitators to help seeking in the population. Our study design allows us to collect both qualitative and quantitative data and therefore will provide a more in-depth and rich understanding of mental health help-seeking behaviour and attitudes towards e-MH support in an AYACCS population. The identification of factors both positively and negatively associated with help-seeking behaviour may help identify potential targets to improve help-seeking behaviour in the future. For example, interventions could be developed to target and overcome factors found to be negatively associated with help-seeking92 and subsequently enhance help-seeking behaviours in an AYACCS population in the future. Furthermore, increasing our understanding of attitudes towards e-MH support and preferences regarding the provision of mental health support in the population may inform the development of more acceptable and relevant interventions for this underserved population. In addition, examining preferences for support will enable the development of future psychological interventions that are specifically tailored to and target the needs on an AYACCS population seeking support in relation to their experience of cancer.

Despite the strengths of this study, the design presents some limitations. First, only those AYACCS who report receiving mental health support in the past 6 months are defined as help-seeking. However, this approach may lead to the exclusion of AYACCS who have attempted to seek formal help but not accessed. Second, the cross-sectional design does not allow us to draw any conclusions regarding cause and effect. Third, the study does not offer any compensation to participants. Research suggests compensation can facilitate the recruitment of minority populations and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.93 Subsequently, this may limit the representativeness of the sample and generalisability of results, especially to marginalised young adults who may already be at an elevated risk of not seeking mental health support.94 Forth, the current study includes a broad age range (16–39 years) and it may be expected that adolescents will have differing needs and preferences to young adults in their 20s or 30s. Indeed, a common limitation of research in the area is the inclusion of heterogeneous samples across different age groups.95 However, the study is designed to be a first step towards developing more acceptable and relevant interventions for the population and may inform future research with specific AYACCS subgroups, taking into account a number of sociodemographic and clinical factors (eg, gender, current age, age at diagnosis, and cancer type). Fifth, the length of the survey may lead to respondent fatigue (eg, lower levels of attention and motivation in later sections of the questionnaire), potentially resulting in poorer quality data or missing data. Finally, we will not evaluate response bias via comparisons of respondents versus non-responders for mailed surveys.

In conclusion, results of the study may have the potential to improve access to tailored, relevant, and acceptable mental health support for this currently underserved population.

Ethics and dissemination

The study is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Dnr: 2020-06271). The rights and welfare of participants will be ensured by all research being conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent will be collected, ensuring participants are aware of requirements for study participation. Participants will be free to withdraw from the study at any time, without providing reason. Contact details for the principal investigator (coauthor LvE), the U-CARE Health and Safety Officer and Uppsala University Data Protection Officer will be provided to all participants should there be any cause for concern regarding the conduct of the study.

All data will be handled according to the Patient Data Act (2008:355) and General Data Protection Regulation (EU 2016/679). Data collected via the online survey via the U-CARE portal will be securely stored on Uppsala University servers. Data collected via the paper-based survey will be entered into an Access Database, stored on Uppsala University servers. Paper questionnaires will be stored in locked secure filing cabinets, only accessible by authorised members of the study team. Participant contact details for the interview study will be stored separately on a USB stick in a locked secure filing cabinet, separate from study data. Interviews will be audio recorded, with audio files uploaded onto and stored on Uppsala University secure server, using participant identifier numbers and immediately deleted from devices. Interview transcripts will omit any personally identifiable data and will be stored on a secure server.

Survey results will be reported in line with the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet e-Surveys96 and results of the embedded qualitative interview study will be reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research.97 Results will be published in scientific publications in peer reviewed journals and conference presentations. Lay language summaries will also be provided to all community-based organisations and support groups who support recruitment into the study.


Contributors:: JW: conceptualisation, methodology, writing—original draft, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition; JM: methodology, resources, writing—original draft, project administration; ÅC: writing—review and editing; PE: writing—review and editing; AH-S: writing—review and editing; JH: resources, writing—review and editing, project administration; MK: methodology, resources, writing—review and editing, project administration; HPS: resources, writing—review and editing, project administration; LvE: conceptualisation, methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition.
Funding:: This work is supported by U-CARE, which is a Strategic Research environment funded by the Swedish Research Council (Dnr 2009-1093) and Fredrik O Ingrid Thurings Stiftelse (grant number 2018-00437).
Competing interests:: None declared.
Patient and public involvement:: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review:: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.


Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, et al. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:3547. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70548-5

Armstrong GT, Kawashima T, Leisenring W, et al. Aging and risk of severe, disabling, life-threatening, and fatal events in the childhood cancer Survivor study. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:121827. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1055

Bhakta N, Liu Q, Ness KK, et al. The cumulative burden of surviving childhood cancer: an initial report from the ST Jude lifetime cohort study (SJLIFE). The Lancet 2017;390:256982. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31610-0

Chow EJ, Ness KK, Armstrong GT, et al. Current and coming challenges in the management of the survivorship population. Semin Oncol 2020;47:2339. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.007

Robison LL, Hudson MM. Survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: life-long risks and responsibilities. Nat Rev Cancer 2014;14:6170. doi: 10.1038/nrc3634

Winick N. Neurocognitive outcome in survivors of pediatric cancer. Curr Opin Pediatr 2011;23:2733. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834255e9

Kirchhoff AC, Krull KR, Ness KK, et al. Occupational outcomes of adult childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer Survivor study. Cancer 2011;117:303344. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25867

Lancashire ER, Frobisher C, Reulen RC, et al. Educational attainment among adult survivors of childhood cancer in Great Britain: a population-based cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:25470. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp498

Ander M, Grönqvist H, Cernvall M, et al. Development of health-related quality of life and symptoms of anxiety and depression among persons diagnosed with cancer during adolescence: a 10-year follow-up study. Psychooncology 2016;25:5829. doi: 10.1002/pon.3965


Brinkman TM, Zhu L, Zeltzer LK, et al. Longitudinal patterns of psychological distress in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Br J Cancer 2013;109:137381. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.428


Seitz DCM, Besier T, Debatin K-M, et al. Posttraumatic stress, depression and anxiety among adult long-term survivors of cancer in adolescence. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:1596606. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.001


Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, et al. Our future: a Lancet Commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. The Lancet 2016;387:242378. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00579-1


Blakemore S-J. Adolescence and mental health. The Lancet 2019;393:20301. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31013-X


Ahomäki R, Kero A, Koivisto M, et al. Purchases of antidepressants after cancer at a young age in Finland. Int J Cancer 2019;144:122733. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31942


Johannsdottir IM, Loge JH, Kiserud CE, et al. Increased prescription rates of anxiolytics and hypnotics to survivors of cancer in childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood-A population-based study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018;65:e26860. doi: 10.1002/pbc.26860


Brinkman TM, Ullrich NJ, Zhang N, et al. Prevalence and predictors of prescription psychoactive medication use in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer Survivor study. J Cancer Surviv 2013;7:10414. doi: 10.1007/s11764-012-0250-x


Gunnes MW, Lie RT, Bjørge T, et al. Suicide and violent deaths in survivors of cancer in childhood, adolescence and young adulthood-A national cohort study. Int J Cancer 2017;140:57580. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30474


Bleyer A, Barr R, Ries L. Cancer in adolescents and young adults. Springer International Publishing, 2017.


Bibby H, White V, Thompson K, et al. What are the unmet needs and care experiences of adolescents and young adults with cancer? A systematic review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2017;6:630. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0012


Kaul S, Avila JC, Mutambudzi M, et al. Mental distress and health care use among survivors of adolescent and young adult cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of the National health interview survey. Cancer 2017;123:86978. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30417


Olsson M, Jarfelt M, Pergert P, et al. Experiences of teenagers and young adults treated for cancer in Sweden. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2015;19:57581. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.03.003


Svedberg P, Einberg E-L, Wärnestål P, et al. Support from healthcare services during transition to adulthood - Experiences of young adult survivors of pediatric cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2016;21:10512. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.02.008


Rebello TJ, Marques A, Gureje O, et al. Innovative strategies for closing the mental health treatment gap globally. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2014;27:30814. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000068


Kim MA, Yi J. Life after cancer: how does public stigma increase psychological distress of childhood cancer survivors? Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51:160514. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.04.005


Riper H, Andersson G, Christensen H, et al. Theme issue on e-mental health: a growing field in Internet research. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:e74. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1713


Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, et al. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. Lancet 2018;392:155398. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X


Andersson G. Internet interventions: past, present and future. Internet Interv 2018;12:1818. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.03.008


Bunge EL, Dickter B, Jones MK, et al. Behavioral intervention technologies and psychotherapy with youth: a review of the literature. Curr Psychiatry Rev 2016;12:1428. doi: 10.2174/1573400511666150930232254


Carlbring P, Andersson G, Cuijpers P, et al. Internet-Based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther 2018;47:118. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115


Sansom-Daly UM, Wakefield CE, Bryant RA, et al. Online group-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for adolescents and young adults after cancer treatment: a multicenter randomised controlled trial of recapture Life-AYA. BMC Cancer 2012;12:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-339


Hagström J, Ander M, Cernvall M, et al. Heeding the psychological concerns of young cancer survivors: a single-arm feasibility trial of CBT and a cognitive behavioral conceptualization of distress. PeerJ 2020;8:e8714. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8714


Younes N, Chollet A, Menard E, et al. E-mental health care among young adults and help-seeking behaviors: a transversal study in a community sample. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e123. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4254


Ander M, Wikman A, Ljótsson B, et al. Guided internet-administered self-help to reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression among adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer during adolescence (U-CARE: YoungCan): a study protocol for a feasibility trial. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013906


Ander M. Cancer during adolescence - psychological consequences and development of psychological treatment, 2017. Available:


Barnett M, McDonnell G, DeRosa A, et al. Psychosocial outcomes and interventions among cancer survivors diagnosed during adolescence and young adulthood (AYA): a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2016;10:81431. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0527-6


Devine KA, Viola AS, Coups EJ, et al. Digital health interventions for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2018;2:115. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00138


Moody L, Turner A, Osmond J, et al. Web-Based self-management for young cancer survivors: consideration of user requirements and barriers to implementation. J Cancer Surviv 2015;9:188200. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0400-4


Seitz DCM, Knaevelsrud C, Duran G, et al. Efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for long-term survivors of pediatric cancer: a pilot study. Support Care Cancer 2014;22:207583. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2193-4


van Ballegooijen W, Cuijpers P, van Straten A, et al. Adherence to Internet-based and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e100674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100674


Nilsson A, Sörman K, Klingvall J, et al. MyCompass in a Swedish context - lessons learned from the transfer of a self-guided intervention targeting mental health problems. BMC Psychiatry 2019;19:51. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2039-1


Woodford J, Farrand P, Bessant M, et al. Recruitment into a guided Internet based CBT (iCBT) intervention for depression: lesson learnt from the failure of a prevalence recruitment strategy. Contemp Clin Trials 2011;32:6418. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.04.013


Rapp AM, Chavira DA, Sugar CA, et al. Integrated primary Medical-Behavioral health care for adolescent and young adult depression: predictors of service use in the youth partners in care trial. J Pediatr Psychol 2017;42:105164. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx057


Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2010;10. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-113


Kaess M, Bauer S. Editorial promoting help-seeking using E-Technology for adolescents: the prohead Consortium. Trials 2019;20:72. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3162-x


Lehmann V, Grönqvist H, Engvall G, et al. Negative and positive consequences of adolescent cancer 10 years after diagnosis: an interview-based longitudinal study in Sweden. Psychooncology 2014;23:122935. doi: 10.1002/pon.3549


Ander M, Thorsell Cederberg J, von Essen L, et al. Exploration of psychological distress experienced by survivors of adolescent cancer reporting a need for psychological support. PLoS One 2018;13:e0195899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195899


Wilford J, Buchbinder D, Fortier MA, et al. “She was a little social butterfly”: A qualitative analysis of parent perception of social functioning in adolescent and young adult brain tumor survivors. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 2017;34:23949. doi: 10.1177/1043454216688660


Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995;36:110. doi: 10.2307/2137284


Bock J-O, Hajek A, König H-H. The longitudinal association between psychological factors and health care use. Health Serv Res 2018;53:106591. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12679


Gudleski GD, Satchidanand N, Dunlap LJ, et al. Predictors of medical and mental health care use in patients with irritable bowel syndrome in the United States. Behav Res Ther 2017;88:6575. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.07.006


Mills V, Van Hooff M, Baur J, et al. Predictors of mental health service utilisation in a non-treatment seeking epidemiological sample of Australian adults. Community Ment Health J 2012;48:51121. doi: 10.1007/s10597-011-9439-0


Mooney-Somers J, Lewis P, Kerridge I. Discursive constructions of youth cancer: findings from creative methods research with healthy young people. J Cancer Surviv 2016;10:42736. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0488-1


Van Schoors M, Caes L, Knoble NB, et al. Systematic review: associations between family functioning and child adjustment after pediatric cancer diagnosis: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol 2017;42:618. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw070


Sweeney GM, Donovan CL, March S, et al. Logging into therapy: adolescent perceptions of online therapies for mental health problems. Internet Interv 2019;15:939. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.12.001


Wetterlin FM, Mar MY, Neilson EK, et al. eMental health experiences and expectations: A survey of youths’ web-based resource preferences in Canada. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e29. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3526


Hollis C, Morriss R, Martin J, et al. Technological innovations in mental healthcare: harnessing the digital revolution. Br J Psychiatry 2015;206:2635. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.142612


Fleming T, Bavin L, Lucassen M, et al. Beyond the trial: systematic review of real-world uptake and engagement with digital self-help interventions for depression, low mood, or anxiety. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e199. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9275


Apolinário-Hagen J, Kemper J, Stürmer C. Public acceptability of e-mental health treatment services for psychological problems: a scoping review. JMIR Ment Health 2017;4:e10. doi: 10.2196/mental.6186


van Beugen S, Ferwerda M, Hoeve D, et al. Internet-Based cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with chronic somatic conditions: a meta-analytic review. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e88. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2777


Radomski AD, Wozney L, McGrath P, et al. Design and delivery features that may improve the use of Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for children and adolescents with anxiety: a realist literature synthesis with a persuasive systems design perspective. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e11128. doi: 10.2196/11128


Ferwerda M, van Beugen S, van Burik A, et al. What patients think about E-health: patients' perspective on internet-based cognitive behavioral treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. Clin Rheumatol 2013;32:86973. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2175-9


Barakat LP, Galtieri LR, Szalda D, et al. Assessing the psychosocial needs and program preferences of adolescents and young adults with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:82332. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2849-8


Grönqvist H, Olsson EMG, Johansson B, et al. Fifteen challenges in establishing a multidisciplinary research program on eHealth research in a university setting: a case study. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e173. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7310


Kilsdonk E, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van der Pal HJ, et al. Effect of web-based versus paper-based questionnaires and follow-up strategies on participation rates of Dutch childhood cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Cancer 2015;1:e11. doi: 10.2196/cancer.3905


Brick JM, Williams D. Explaining rising nonresponse rates in cross-sectional surveys. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2013;645:3659. doi: 10.1177/0002716212456834


Batterham PJ. Recruitment of mental health survey participants using Internet advertising: content, characteristics and cost effectiveness. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2014;23:18491. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1421


Gorman JR, Roberts SC, Dominick SA, et al. A diversified recruitment approach incorporating social media leads to research participation among young adult-aged female cancer survivors. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2014;3:5965. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2013.0031


O'Connor A, Jackson L, Goldsmith L, et al. Can I get a retweet please? Health research recruitment and the Twittersphere. J Adv Nurs 2014;70:599609. doi: 10.1111/jan.12222


Kilsdonk E, Wendel E, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, et al. Participation rates of childhood cancer survivors to self-administered questionnaires: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care 2017;26:e12462. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12462


Boerema AM, Kleiboer A, Beekman ATF, et al. Determinants of help-seeking behavior in depression: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2016;16:78. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0790-0


Apolinário-Hagen J, Vehreschild V, Alkoudmani RM. Current views and perspectives on e-mental health: an exploratory survey study for understanding public attitudes toward Internet-based psychotherapy in Germany. JMIR Ment Health 2017;4:e8. doi: 10.2196/mental.6375


Apolinário-Hagen J, Harrer M, Kählke F, et al. Public attitudes toward guided Internet-based therapies: web-based survey study. JMIR Ment Health 2018;5:e10735. doi: 10.2196/10735


Alfonsson S, Wallin E, Maathz P. Factor structure and validity of the depression, anxiety and stress Scale-21 in Swedish translation. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2017;24:15462. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12363


Brown TA, Chorpita BF, Korotitsch W, et al. Psychometric properties of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behav Res Ther 1997;35:7989. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00068-X


Ng F, Trauer T, Dodd S, et al. The validity of the 21-item version of the depression anxiety stress scales as a routine clinical outcome measure. Acta Neuropsychiatr 2007;19:30410. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5215.2007.00217.x


Sinclair SJ, Siefert CJ, Slavin-Mulford JM, et al. Psychometric evaluation and normative data for the depression, anxiety, and stress scales-21 (DASS-21) in a nonclinical sample of U.S. adults. Eval Health Prof 2012;35:25979. doi: 10.1177/0163278711424282


Bottesi G, Ghisi M, Altoè G, et al. The Italian version of the depression anxiety stress scales-21: factor structure and psychometric properties on community and clinical samples. Compr Psychiatry 2015;60:17081. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.04.005


Komiya N, Good GE, Sherrod NB. Emotional openness as a predictor of college students’ attitudes toward seeking psychological help. J Couns Psychol 2000;47:13843. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.138


Bathje G, Pryor J. The relationships of public and self-stigma to seeking mental health services. J Ment Health Couns 2011;33:16176. doi: 10.17744/mehc.33.2.g6320392741604l1


Pinto MD, Greenblatt AM, Hickman RL, et al. Assessing the critical parameters of eSMART-MH: a promising avatar-based digital therapeutic intervention to reduce depressive symptoms. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2016;52:15768. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12112


Cohen S, Mermelstein R, Kamarck T. Measuring the functional components of social support. : Sarason IG, Sarason BR, . Social support: theory, research, and applications. Martinus Nijhoff, 1985: 7394.


Jung H, von Sternberg K, Davis K. Expanding a measure of mental health literacy: development and validation of a multicomponent mental health literacy measure. Psychiatry Res 2016;243:27886. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.034


Fusch PI, Ness LR. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qual Rep 2015;20:140816.


Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? an experiment with data saturation and variability. Sage journal 2006;18:5982.


Sim J, Saunders B, Waterfield J, et al. Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? Int J Soc Res Methodol 2018;21:61934. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1454643


Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008;62:10715. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x


Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45:21422. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.3.214


Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res 1999;34:1189208.


Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL. Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol 1999;38:21529. doi: 10.1348/014466599162782


Jennings H, Slade M, Bates P, et al. Best practice framework for patient and public involvement (PPi) in collaborative data analysis of qualitative mental health research: methodology development and refinement. BMC Psychiatry 2018;18. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1794-8


Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ 2017;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453


Kauer SD, Mangan C, Sanci L. Do online mental health services improve help-seeking for young people? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3103


Kost RG, de Rosa JC, Correa da Rosa J. Impact of survey length and compensation on validity, reliability, and sample characteristics for ultrashort-, short-, and Long-Research participant perception surveys. J Clin Trans Sci 2018;2:317. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.18


Sapiro B, Ward A. Marginalized youth, mental health, and connection with others: a review of the literature. Child Adolesc Soc Work 2020;J37:34357.


Warner EL, Kent EE, Trevino KM, et al. Social well-being among adolescents and young adults with cancer: a systematic review. Cancer 2016;122:102937. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29866


Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of Internet e-surveys (cherries). J Med Internet Res 2004;6:e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34


O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine 2014;89:124551. is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: behaviour and attitudes towards internet-administered psychological support among adolescent and young adults previously treated for cancer during childhood: protocol for a survey and embedded qualitative interview study in Sweden&author=Joanne Woodford,Jenny Månberg,Åsa Cajander,Pia Enebrink,Arja Harila-Saari,Josefin Hagström,Mathilda Karlsson,Hanna Placid Solimena,Louise von Essen,&keyword=mental health,paediatric oncology,primary care,child & adolescent psychiatry,qualitative research,&subject=Mental Health,1506,1712,