Animal Microbiome
BioMed Central
image
Sustainable plant-based diets promote rainbow trout gut microbiota richness and do not alter resistance to bacterial infection
DOI 10.1186/s42523-021-00107-2 , Volume: 3 , Issue: null , Pages: 0-0
Article Type: research-article, Article History
Abstract

Background

Farmed fish food with reduced fish-derived products are gaining growing interest due to the ecological impact of fish-derived protein utilization and the necessity to increase aquaculture sustainability. Although different terrestrial plant proteins could replace fishmeal proteins, their use is associated with adverse effects. Here, we investigated how diets composed of terrestrial vegetal sources supplemented with proteins originating from insect, yeast or terrestrial animal by-products affect rainbow trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) gut microbiota composition, growth performance and resistance to bacterial infection by the fish pathogen Flavobacterium psychrophilum responsible for frequent outbreaks in aquaculture settings.

Results

We showed that the tested regimes significantly increased gut bacterial richness compared to full vegetal or commercial-like diets, and that vegetal diet supplemented with insect and yeast proteins improves growth performance compared to full vegetal diet without altering rainbow trout susceptibility to F. psychrophilum infection.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that the use of insect and yeast protein complements to vegetal fish feeds maintain microbiota functions, growth performance and fish health, therefore identifying promising alternative diets to improve aquaculture’s sustainability.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42523-021-00107-2.

Keywords

Background

Aquaculture is a fast-growing animal-food production sector that currently supplies over 50% of the fish and seafood for human consumption [1]. Fish farming still relies on marine fish-derived fishmeal as the primary protein source in fishfood [2]. Considering the decline of available marine natural resources, the replacement of fishmeal by proteins originating from terrestrial plant sources is actively investigated [24]. However, although more sustainable than fishmeal, the use of full plant-based diets in aquaculture is associated with reduced growth yield, modification of fish metabolism and increased sensitivity to diseases potentially due to unbalanced amino acid profile, presence of anti-nutritional factors and alteration of fish microbiota [57].

Alternatives to terrestrial plant protein sources are currently sought to replace fish-derived proteins, including extracts from insects, yeast, and terrestrial animal by-products [810]. These protein sources display interesting nutritional value and could mitigate the adverse effects of plant-derived proteins [11, 12]. However, the consequences on fish growth of introducing new ingredients in fish feeds need to be carefully evaluated as fish are sensitive to dietary changes [13] and the stability of gut microbial communities is an essential factor affecting fish health [14, 15]. Dietary changes can impact growth performance, digestibility as well as host immunity and resistance to diseases [12, 1618]. The protection provided by the microbiota against pathogens is indeed of particular importance in high-density aquaculture settings, where farmed fish are often plagued by disease outbreaks that threaten the economic sustainability of the farming industry [19]. Among the most prominent fish pathogens, Flavobacterium psychrophilum is a common freshwater bacterium and the causative agent of Bacterial Cold-Water Disease and Rainbow Trout Fry Syndrome. This pathogen affects a wide range of temperate and cold-water fish worldwide, especially salmonids such as rainbow trout (Onchorynchus mykiss ), one of the leading aquaculture species [20].

Here, we investigated the short-term consequences of protein source substitution on gut microbiota composition, growth performance and resistance to F. psychrophilum infection in rainbow trout. We compared diets exclusively composed of terrestrial vegetal sources to diets supplemented with proteins originating from insect, yeast or terrestrial animal by-products. We showed that insects and yeast constitute promising protein complements to vegetal fish feeds by increasing gut bacterial richness and improving growth performance compared to a vegetal diet or a commercial-like diet, without altering fish resistance to an experimental F. psychrophilum infection. These properties support the potential interest of these ingredients in maintaining growth performance and microbiota functions while contributing to the aquaculture’s sustainable development.

Results

Changes of protein sources in diet affect the α-diversity of rainbow trout gut microbiota

To evaluate the effect of diet modification on microbiome composition, we performed a 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of the microbial gut content of rainbow trout subjected to four different diets: T0 , a commercial fishmeal-rich diet; Tv, a full terrestrial plant-based diet devoid of fishmeal; F1, a plant-based diet in which 11% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% of proteins from yeast (YEA) and 5.5% of proteins from insect larvae (INS); and F2, a plant-based diet in which 16.5% of vegetal proteins have been replaced by 5.5% YEA, 5.5% INS and 5.5% processed animal proteins (PAP) (Supplementary Table S1). An average of 340,612 reads for the amplified 16S rRNA gene was obtained per sample. After quality filtering, denoising, and chimeric removal, we obtained an average of 237,752 good-quality reads (Supplementary Table S2). The diversity analyses were performed according to the sample’s depth with the lowest number of reads (43,800). The intestinal microbiome of fish fed the experimental diets F1 and F2 had a significantly higher richness than those fed the control Tv and T0 diets (F1 vs T0 and Tv, p-values = 0.03; F2 vs T0 and Tv; p-values = 0.02 and 0.002, respectively), with about 350 Amplicon Single Variants (ASVs) detected in the F1 and F2 groups and a lower number of ASVs (about 200) in the Tv and T0 control groups (Fig. 1A). No differences were found in the number of ASVs among the control diets Tv and T0 (p-value > 0.05), although more diversity was found in the T0 group reaching the limit of significance (p-value = 0.05). The Shannon index was used to examine diversity distribution and showed that microbiota from fish fed the experimental diets F1 and F2 were significantly more diverse (p  < 0.01) than that of fish fed the full-vegetal Tv control diet (Fig. 1B). The results showed that intestinal microbiota diversity of rainbow trout was higher when fish were fed the diets containing alternative protein sources.

Bacterial α-diversity metrics (A: Amplicon Single Variants (ASV) richness, and B: Shannon index) of the gut of rainbow trout submitted to four different diets (n = 9 fish/diet). T0: commercial fishmeal-rich diet; Tv: full terrestrial plant-based diet devoid of fishmeal; F1: plant-based diet in which 11% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% of proteins from yeast (YEA) and 5.5% of proteins from insect larvae (INS); F2: plant-based diet in which 16.5% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% YEA, 5.5% INS and 5.5% processed animal proteins (PAP). The kruskal-wallis pairwise test was used to perform the statistical comparisons among diets. Significance: *, p-value < 0.05; **, p-value < 0.01; ***, p-value < 0.001
Fig. 1
Bacterial α-diversity metrics (A: Amplicon Single Variants (ASV) richness, and B: Shannon index) of the gut of rainbow trout submitted to four different diets (n = 9 fish/diet). T0: commercial fishmeal-rich diet; Tv: full terrestrial plant-based diet devoid of fishmeal; F1: plant-based diet in which 11% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% of proteins from yeast (YEA) and 5.5% of proteins from insect larvae (INS); F2: plant-based diet in which 16.5% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% YEA, 5.5% INS and 5.5% processed animal proteins (PAP). The kruskal-wallis pairwise test was used to perform the statistical comparisons among diets. Significance: *, p-value < 0.05; **, p-value < 0.01; ***, p-value < 0.001

The origin of diet protein sources shapes the composition of rainbow trout gut microbiota

To determine whether the different experimental diets could alter the overall composition of rainbow trout gut bacterial communities, we compared samples from different groups (β-diversity). The microbial community variations among groups were explored by Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) applied to the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix. Fishmeal replacement by terrestrial vegetal proteins clearly affects the gut microbial structure since samples from T0 and Tv clustered in two separate groups. The microbiota under diets T0 and Tv shows a higher variability compared to F1 and F2, which profiles were more homogeneous. Furthermore, the inclusion of new protein sources such as insect and yeast proteins in F1 and the same sources supplemented with PAP in F2 resulted in distinct bacterial communities among the groups compared to the control diets (Fig. 2A). The significance of the observed clusters was confirmed by the PERMANOVA test coupled to the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix (p  < 0.001) (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Table S3). Moreover, the weighted UniFrac analysis (phylogenetic distance) also revealed that community phylogenetic diversity and relative abundance of ASVs were significantly different (p  < 0.001) among groups, confirming what was found with the ecological distance Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (Supplementary Table S3). Interestingly, when we compared the microbiota of water, feed, and fish intestine, we observed that rainbow trout gut microbial composition is more similar to that of feed than water, the latter being significantly different from the fish gut composition, independently of the diet (Fig. 2B). Altogether, these results showed that while diet modification has a significant impact, the microbiota present in surrounding water has little effect on rainbow trout’s bacterial community structure.

Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) for A, gut microbial composition comparisons between rainbow trout fed four different dietary protein sources for three months (n = 9 fish/diet); and B, sample types including microbial structure associated to each food and raising water. Each dot represents an individual sample plot according to its microbial profile at the ASV level. Results of Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) coupled with the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix are reported. Significance was set at p < 0.05. T0: commercial fishmeal-rich diet; Tv: full terrestrial plant-based diet devoid of fishmeal; F1: plant-based diet in which 11% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% of proteins from yeast (YEA) and 5.5% of proteins from insect larvae (INS); F2: plant-based diet in which 16.5% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% YEA, 5.5% INS and 5.5% processed animal proteins (PAP)
Fig. 2
Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) for A, gut microbial composition comparisons between rainbow trout fed four different dietary protein sources for three months (n = 9 fish/diet); and B, sample types including microbial structure associated to each food and raising water. Each dot represents an individual sample plot according to its microbial profile at the ASV level. Results of Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) coupled with the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix are reported. Significance was set at p < 0.05. T0: commercial fishmeal-rich diet; Tv: full terrestrial plant-based diet devoid of fishmeal; F1: plant-based diet in which 11% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% of proteins from yeast (YEA) and 5.5% of proteins from insect larvae (INS); F2: plant-based diet in which 16.5% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% YEA, 5.5% INS and 5.5% processed animal proteins (PAP)

Comparison of rainbow trout microbiota composition among experimental groups reveals a diet-independent core microbiota

In rainbow trout, as in many other fish species, a set of bacteria is present in the gastrointestinal tract irrespective of the diet, forming its “core microbiota” [21], which is hypothesized to contribute to the beneficial relationship between host and microbiota [22]. We determined that the intestinal core microbiota across all individuals tested was composed of ten shared ASVs, including eight Proteobacteria (orders Sphingomonadales, Hyphomicrobiales, Caulobacterales, Burkholderiales, Rickettsiales and class Gammaproteobacteria), one Firmicutes (order Lactobacillales), and one Actinobacteria (order Propionibacteriales ) (Fig. 3). A total of 12 ASVs were specific of diet, while the two diets sharing more taxa were F1 and F2, with 12 ASVs in common. Some dominant and previously reported members of rainbow trout microbiota, including Lactobacillales, Comamonadaceae, Rickettsiales, and Bradyrhizobiaceae were included in this core composition [21, 2325]. Some ASVs could not be taxonomically assigned to the genus level, suggesting that (1) the rainbow trout microbial diversity is far from being fully described; (2) the selected 16S rRNA region cannot discriminate between close genera; or (3) the taxa are not found due to gaps in the database. These results indicated that a core microbiota is stably associated with rainbow trout gut, regardless of the used diets.

Venn diagram representing unique and shared Amplicon Single Variants (ASVs) in the gut of rainbow trout fed four different diets (n = 9 fish/diet). The core microbiome was defined as the ASVs present in all samples, regardless of diet. Only taxa presented in all samples of each group were included
Fig. 3
Venn diagram representing unique and shared Amplicon Single Variants (ASVs) in the gut of rainbow trout fed four different diets (n = 9 fish/diet). The core microbiome was defined as the ASVs present in all samples, regardless of diet. Only taxa presented in all samples of each group were included

Distinct dietary protein sources alter rainbow trout gut bacterial community

To determine whether the different experimental diets can alter gut microbiota composition, an overall taxonomic characterization of the bacterial community was conducted. A total of 20 different bacterial phyla were identified among which Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were dominant, regardless of the diet used. However, fish fed the control vegetal diet (Tv) showed an increase in the relative abundance of the phylum Firmicutes (58.89%) as well as a decrease in Proteobacteria (29.83%) compared to fish fed the T0 diet, rich in fishmeal (23.08 and 64.61%, respectively) (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Proteobacteria p-value = 0.0001645; Firmicutes p -value = 0.002756) (Fig. 4). Further, fish fed the experimental diets F1 and F2 showed a significant increase in the abundance of Firmicutes (p-values = 0.0002879, 8.227e− 05) and Tenericutes (p-values = 0.000161, 0.000161) and a significant decrease of Proteobacteria (p-values = 0.0001645, 4.114e-05), compared to the control commercial (T0) group. When fish fed both F1 and F2 experimental diets were compared to those fed the Tv full-vegetal diet, an increase of Actinobacteria was detected (p-values = 4.114e− 05, 4.114e− 05 ) (Fig. 4, Supplementary Figure S1).

Relative abundance (%) of the overall most prevalent bacterial phyla of the gut of rainbow trout fed different diets
Fig. 4
Relative abundance (%) of the overall most prevalent bacterial phyla of the gut of rainbow trout fed different diets

To account for differences in sequencing depth, we conducted a differential abundance analysis of the detected microbiota on a proportional abundance table agglomerated at the species level using Analysis of Composition of Microbiomes with Bias Correction (ANCOM-BC) [26]. ANCOM-BC analysis revealed that five species belonging to the order Lactobacillales were significantly more abundant in the Tv group compared to fish fed the T0 fishmeal-rich diet (p  < 0.05, ANCOM-BC) (Table 1). These ASVs consist of two species of Lactobacillus genus (Lactobacillus hamsteri and L. paraplantarum), two members of the family Leuconostocaceae, and one identified as Streptococcus agalactiae (Table 1).

Table 1
Mean differences of taxa absolute abundance between groups (natural log scale) and standard errors (SEs). The analysis is based on the “Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction” (ANCOM-BC). Only taxa with significantly different abundance between diets are shown (adjusted p-value < 0.05, Bonferroni correction)
Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species Mean difference SE q-value
Tv vs T0
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Lactobacillaceae Lactobacillus hamsteri 5.71 1.24 0.0002
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Leuconostocaceae Lactobacillus paraplantarum 5.49 1.24 0.0005
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Streptococcus agalactiae 4.69 1.25 0.0104
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Leuconostocaceae 5.01 0.94 4.78e-06
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Leuconostocaceae Pediococcus 6.09 1.27 8.94e-05
Tv vs F1
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Lactobacillaceae Lactobacillus −3.78 0.94 0.0036
Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae −3.06 0.76 0.0032
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Leuconostocaceae Weissella hellenica −7.49 1.02 1.53e-11
Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Actinomycetales Corynebacteriaceae Corynebacterium aurimucosum −5.76 0.95 6.15e-07
Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Actinomycetales −3.90 0.60 6.33e-09
Tv vs F2
Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae −3.14 0.74 0.0013
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Lactobacillaceae Lactobacillus −3.65 0.94 0.0057
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales −1.95 0.51 0.0068
Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Actinomycetales Corynebacteriaceae Corynebacterium aurimucosum −5.72 0.99 6.15e-07
Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Actinomycetales Corynebacteriaceae Corynebacterium −5.32 0.78 6.21e-10
Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Actinomycetales −3.95 0.65 8.02e-08
F1 vs F2
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Leuconostocaceae Weissella hellenica −5.72 0.83 5.74e-10
Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Actinomycetales Streptomycetaceae 0.95 0.27 0.0382
Tenericutes Mollicutes RsaHF231 1.48 0.36 0.0030
Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales 1.47 0.30 0.0001

While conducting differential abundance analysis between the experimental diets F1 and F2 and the Tv vegetal control diet, ANCOM-BC detected a significant increase of 5 and 6 taxa, in groups F1 and F2, respectively (Table 1). Four of those taxa with increased abundance are shared in both experimental diets, i.e. 2 Firmicutes (one identified at the genus level as Lactobacillus, and the other at the family level as Bacillaceae), and 2 Actinobacteria (both belonging to the genus Corynebacterium). These results suggest that the increase of these taxonomic groups is mainly associated with the ingredients included in the experimental diet F1 (i.e., yeast and insect proteins), while the PAP included in diet F2 are not involved in the increase. Furthermore, fish fed F1 also showed an increase of another species identified as Weisella hellenica (family Lactobacillaceae ) (Table 1). In the group fed diet F2, the abundance of an additional species belonging to the phylum Actinobacteria was higher than in those fed the Tv vegetal control diet (Table 1).

When the taxonomic composition of the microbiota of fish fed diets F1 and F2 are compared, the higher abundance of W. hellenica in F1 fed fish is confirmed. Interestingly, the F2 group displayed an increase of three different taxa compared to F1 fed fish: one species belonging to the phylum Firmicutes (order Lactobacillales), one Tenericutes (class Mollicutes), and one Actinobacteria (family Streptomycetaceae).

We tested the association of diet-related variables (dry material, proteins (%), lipids (%), energy, and cinders) with the gut microbiome composition (Supplementary Table S4). The protein (%) was the only variable that showed a significant association with the gut composition (aGLMM-MiRKAT, p-value = 0.00019996).

The use of alternative protein sources in diets impacts rainbow trout feed efficiency and growth performance

We tested how plant-based feeds supplemented by either insect, yeast or processed animal proteins affected rainbow trout growth performance compared to conventional fishmeal-based diets. For the entire feeding trial duration, observed mortality was 7, 10.5, 5, and 12.5% in fish fed T0, Tv, F1, and F2, respectively. Fish fed both experimental diets F1 or F2 displayed a similar final body weight (2.84 ± 0.02 and 2.73 ± 0.10 g) (P  > 0.05) (Fig. 5A). When groups fed the experimental F1 and F2 diets were compared to those fed the terrestrial-plant based diet Tv (1.88 ± 0.01 g), a significantly higher final body weight was found in the two former groups (P  < 0.05) (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, no significant difference was observed between the final body weights of fish fed both experimental diets, F1 and F2, and the fishmeal-based diet (2.74 ± 0.01 g) (P  > 0.05) (Fig. 5A).

Body weight gain, Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) and daily feed intake. A Evolution of body weight gain of rainbow trout fed with different experimental diets from the first feeding and during 12 weeks. Mean body weights for each diet are presented as mean ± standard error. B Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) were calculated per tank as follows: FCR = feed intake (g)/ fish weight gain (g) during the 12 weeks. C Daily feed intake was calculated for each tank as follows: feed consumed (g) / mean kg body weight.day. Mean values for each diet are presented as mean ± standard error. T0: commercial fishmeal-rich diet (n = 1); Tv: full terrestrial plant-based diet devoid of fishmeal (n = 2); F1: plant-based diet in which 11% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% of proteins from yeast (YEA) and 5.5% of proteins from insect larvae (INS) (n = 2); F2: plant-based diet in which 16.5% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% YEA, 5.5% INS and 5.5% processed animal proteins (PAP) (n = 2)
Fig. 5
Body weight gain, Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) and daily feed intake. A Evolution of body weight gain of rainbow trout fed with different experimental diets from the first feeding and during 12 weeks. Mean body weights for each diet are presented as mean ± standard error. B Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) were calculated per tank as follows: FCR = feed intake (g)/ fish weight gain (g) during the 12 weeks. C Daily feed intake was calculated for each tank as follows: feed consumed (g) / mean kg body weight.day. Mean values for each diet are presented as mean ± standard error. T0: commercial fishmeal-rich diet (n = 1); Tv: full terrestrial plant-based diet devoid of fishmeal (n = 2); F1: plant-based diet in which 11% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% of proteins from yeast (YEA) and 5.5% of proteins from insect larvae (INS) (n = 2); F2: plant-based diet in which 16.5% of plant proteins have been replaced by 5.5% YEA, 5.5% INS and 5.5% processed animal proteins (PAP) (n = 2)

The tested diets exhibited similar Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) except for the control full-vegetal Tv diet, for which the FCR value (Fig. 5B) almost doubled. A similar pattern was observed for the daily feed intake, which increased for fish fed the Tv diet (Fig. 5C). Altogether these results highlight a strong degradation of the feed efficiency in fish fed the Tv diet that was not mitigated by an enhanced feed intake, therefore resulting in lower growth performances. However, these results also showed that supplementation of an entirely plant-based diet with proteins originating from insects, terrestrial animal by-products, and/or yeast restored the fish growth performance at equivalent levels compared to fishmeal-based diet.

Changes of protein sources in fish diet do not increase rainbow trout susceptibility to an experimental Flavobacterium psychrophilum infection

Diet modification and potential changes in the commensal microbial composition can influence the rainbow trout susceptibility to pathogens [27]. F. psychrophilum commonly infects the skin and gills of fish, and can adhere to and damage the intestinal epithelium [28, 29]. To determine whether the observed changes in the gut microbial community of rainbow trout can modify its susceptibility to bacterial infection following the feeding period, we exposed 60 fish (duplicates of 30 fish) of each different dietary group to F. psychrophilum using an immersion challenge model that supposedly mimics the natural infection route better than the usual injection route [30]. After fish exposition to the virulent F. psychrophilum strain FRGDSA 1882/11 for 24 h, no significant difference in fish mortality was observed between those fed the T0 commercial and the Tv vegetal based control diets (13.5 vs 1.5%, respectively) (Fig. 6). Interestingly, the F1 and F2 experimental diets did not significantly affect the susceptibility of fish to infection compared to the Tv control diet, though an upward trend could indeed be observed (5 vs 16.5% mortality, respectively) (Fig. 6). None of the non-challenged control fish died during the experiment. F. psychrophilum was re-isolated from the spleen of dead or moribund fish from all infected groups. These results showed that the diet modifications tested did not affect rainbow trout susceptibility to F. psychrophilum infection.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves of rainbow trout following infection by immersion challenge with F. psychrophilum strain FRGDSA 1882/11. Fish fed the Tv, T0, F1, and F2 diets were infected for 24 h with 2 × 107 CFU mL−1 in a final volume of 10 L. The results correspond to the survival percentage during 28 days post-infection (dpi) of two replicates (n = 60 fish per condition). Kaplan-Meier survival data was analyzed by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test
Fig. 6
Kaplan–Meier survival curves of rainbow trout following infection by immersion challenge with F. psychrophilum strain FRGDSA 1882/11. Fish fed the Tv, T0, F1, and F2 diets were infected for 24 h with 2 × 107 CFU mL−1 in a final volume of 10 L. The results correspond to the survival percentage during 28 days post-infection (dpi) of two replicates (n = 60 fish per condition). Kaplan-Meier survival data was analyzed by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test

Discussion

In sustainable aquaculture, aquafeeds using terrestrial plant-based proteins are gaining increasing importance to cope with the limited availability of fishmeal and reduce the ecological impact of fishmeal utilization. Reliance on fishmeal drastically increases the environmental footprint of farmed fish, because fishmeal-based feeds require harvest from wild fish stocks, further damaging marine ecosystems [3, 31]. However, the use of alternative plant protein sources can induce nutritional imbalance and low palatability in some carnivorous fish species. Together with the presence of anti-nutritional factors, the use of terrestrial plant-based proteins in fish feeds could damage the intestinal tract, reduce nutrient absorption, and fish growth [3]. Whereas previous studies analyzed the effect of fishmeal partial or total replacement by single alternative protein sources on fish growth performance and microbiota composition [8, 3236], our study assessed the impact of a full replacement of fishmeal with a mix of proteins from different sources. We confirmed that a full terrestrial plant ingredients feed (Tv) resulted in a significantly reduced growth in rainbow trout [3739]. In contrast, we showed that supplementing a full vegetal diet with proteins from insect and yeast (F1 diet) restored growth performances similar to those obtained in fish fed a fishmeal-rich diet (T0 ). This is consistent with recent studies demonstrating an increase of final body weight and improved feed efficiency of adult rainbow trout fed a plant-based diet supplemented with either insect protein-extract or yeast proteins [32, 33, 40].

Fish gut microbial communities are highly dynamic and respond rapidly to variations in selective local pressures such as diet modification [15, 41]. According to our findings, the gut bacterial community of rainbow trout fry is dominated by members of the phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes in the four dietary groups. These phyla usually represent up to 90% of fish intestinal microbiota in different marine and freshwater species [12, 13]. In rainbow trout, as in many other fish species, a set of bacteria occurs in the gastrointestinal tract irrespective of the diet, forming its “core microbiota” [21]. In our study, we identified 10 such core bacterial ASVs, some of which had already been identified in the core microbiota of rainbow trout gut [21, 2325]. While no significant difference in α-diversity was observed between gut microbiota of fish fed the T0 fishmeal-rich diet and the Tv full-terrestrial plant-based diet, our results showed that both experimental diets F1 and F2 significantly increased gut bacterial richness compared to the Tv and T0 control diets. This increase could be explained by the introduction of proteins from insect larvae in fish diet, as previously reported in rainbow trout [23, 42]. A higher bacterial diversity could be beneficial since reduced diversity leads to a low colonization resistance capacity, allowing opportunistic pathogens to easily colonize the gastrointestinal tract of fish [43]. Conversely, the additional inclusion of 5.5% proteins from terrestrial animal by-products did not affect intestinal α-diversity, as shown by the lack of significant differences between F1 and F2. Similarly, replacing fishmeal with a mix of terrestrial animal by-product meals and plant proteins did not induce significant changes in gut microbial richness and α-diversity in rainbow trout [8].

Interestingly, ß-diversity analyses revealed a significant relationship between diet type and fish intestine microbiota, as shown by the clustering of samples by diet. Full replacement of fishmeal by terrestrial-plant proteins induces an increase of the relative abundance of the phylum Firmicutes, while Proteobacteria decreased, as previously reported in rainbow trout [8, 39, 44, 45]. ANCOM-BC analysis showed that the terrestrial plant-based Tv diet induced a significant increase of five species belonging to the order Lactobacillales compared to fish fed the T0 fishmeal-rich diet. Thus, the full replacement of fishmeal by terrestrial plants derived proteins in Tv diet induced an increase in Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) such as Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Streptococcus . These results are in line with previous studies that also showed that the inclusion of terrestrial plant proteins in rainbow trout diet induces a significant increase of several LAB among other microorganisms [21, 39, 44, 45]. Interestingly, several strains belonging to the genus Pediococcus displayed probiotic properties in vitro [46] and in vivo in rainbow trout [47]. In other fish species, feeds containing plant derivate indigestible fiber and fermentable polysaccharides were associated with an increase of LAB that can utilize such substrates for their metabolism and growth [4850]. LAB are considered the most promising bacteria to be used as probiotics in aquaculture due to their ability to stimulate the host’s gastrointestinal development, digestive function, mucosal tolerance, immune response, and to improve disease resistance. However, in addition to the numerous beneficial LAB, several important fish-pathogenic bacteria also belong to this group [51]. This is the case of S. agalactiae, which relative abundance is increased in the Tv full-terrestrial plant-based diet. S. agalactiae has been reported to affect different wild and farmed fish species, particularly the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus ) [52].

Samples from fish fed the experimental diets F1 and F2 both significantly clustered separately from those fed the T0 and Tv control diets. Similar to full-terrestrial plant-based fed fish, a significant increase in the relative abundance of the phylum Firmicutes, and a decrease of Proteobacteria were observed in fish fed both experimental diets compared to the T0 group. In addition, the supplementation with alternative proteins sources induced a significant increase of the phyla Tenericutes and Actinobacteria compared to both the T0 and Tv diets. Several members of the phyla Tenericutes and Firmicutes might contribute to the digestion of complex polysaccharides, as suggested in rainbow trout [53] and other fish species [54]. The increase of the phylum Actinobacteria may be due to the introduction of chitin-rich insect hydrolyzed proteins [23, 55], since members of this phylum, such as the genus Streptomyces, are particularly efficient decomposers of chitinous material [56]. The increase of Actinobacteria could be explained by the increased abundance of two species belonging to this phylum, including one identified as Corynebacterium aurimucosum, that have been detected as more abundant by ANCOM-BC analysis in the gut microbiote of fish fed the F1 and F2 experimental diets.

The effect on the phylum Firmicutes can also be observed at the ASV level, where the F1 and F2 diets induced a significant increase of members of the orders Lactobacillales and Bacillales in fish gut microbiota. The introduction of poultry by-product proteins (PAP) in the F2 diet slightly altered the microbial profile observed in F1-fed fish by increasing three different species belonging to the phyla Actinobacteria (family Streptomycetaceae), Firmicutes (order Lactobacillales) and phylum Tenericutes (class Mollicutes). Also, the relative abundance of W. hellenica is significantly decreased in F2 group compared to the F1 group. This fact may be of importance since W. hellenica is a LAB species that have been used as a probiotic in fish, due to its antimicrobial activity against several fish pathogens [57].

Based on observed changes in fish gut microbiota composition induced by diet manipulation, we tested the influence of these modifications on the rainbow trout susceptibility to the notorious salmonid pathogen F. psychrophilum. Strikingly, the new feed formulations did not affect the susceptibility of rainbow trout to F. psychrophilum infection compared to fish fed a fishmeal-rich diet. This promising result may be linked to the fact that the enrichment in bacterial diversity induced by the alternative protein sources increased the resistance of the host to infections. In addition, the ß-glucans in insect and yeast derived ingredients were shown to successfully stimulate the immune response of fish and their resistance to pathogens [58, 59].

Conclusions

In conclusion, compared to a commercial-like fishmeal-based diet, supplementation with a mix of alternative proteins from insect and yeast reduced the adverse effects of plant-based diet on growth performance and increased the richness of the gut microbiota without impacting the resistance to F. psychrophilum. These results open new perspectives to enhance the efficiency of fish feeds devoid of fishmeal and contribute to the development of a more sustainable aquaculture.

Methods

Fish and breeding conditions

The four diets were formulated by Le Gouessant Aquaculture® company and produced in small scale by INRAE facilities (Supplementary Table S1 and S4). The T0 control diet was a commercial-like diet containing fishmeal and fish oil. The three other diets (Tv, F1 and F2) were composed of a blend of plant proteins and oil sources and microalgae as DHA source. In diets F1 and F2, 11 and 16.5% of the plant ingredients were replaced by alternative protein sources, respectively. In diet F1, 11% of plant proteins were replaced by 5.5% of yeast protein fraction from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Nutrisaf® 503, Phileo by Lesaffre, France) and 5.5% of hydrolyzed insect larvae meal (Hermetia illucens) (Copalis, France). In diet F2, an additional replacement of 5.5% of plant proteins by the same amount of processed animal proteins (composed of a blend of poultry blood meal and by-product meal) was carried out. Pellets were obtained using an extrusion cooking process (CLEXTRAL BC45 extruder with double screw, Firminy, France) under a 44.5 bar pressure and a 52 °C mean temperature, then dried at 40 °C with an air flux for a minimum of 2 h.

The rainbow trout standard line (SY*AUT) selected by INRAE-PEIMA was used. Eyed eggs (210 degrees days) entered the facilities after disinfection (Romeiode®) and were incubated at 10 °C in a recycling aquaculture system (RAS) into dechlorinated water. Before first feeding, fry were randomly distributed in 30-l aquariums (200 fish/aquarium); 2 aquariums were used for each experimental diet (Tv, F1 and F2) and the control diet (T0). Fish were reared for 14 weeks (90 days) from the first feeding with ad libitum feed rations (4–5 meals/day). During this growth phase, feed rations and fish were weighed every 15 days to evaluate the zootechnical performance (growth and FCR). FCR was calculated as follows: FCR = feed intake (g)/ fish weight gain (g). At the end of the growth period, some of the fish were sampled for microbial analysis, while others were transferred to the “pathogen zone” of the experimental facilities (NSB2) for experimental infection trials.

Fish infection challenges

Infection challenges were performed by immersion as previously described [30]. Fish (3 g) were transferred to continuous-flow aquaria for infection experiments. Groups of 30 fish fed the control and experimental diets were challenged in duplicates (n = 60 per diet). The highly virulent F. psychrophilum strain FRGDSA 1882/11 [60] was grown in TYES broth (0.4% (w/v) tryptone, 0.04% (w/v) yeast extract, 0.05% (w/v) MgSO4 7H2O, 0.02% (w/v) CaCl2 2H2O, 0.05% (w/v) D-glucose, pH 7.2) at 200 rpm and 18 °C to late-exponential phase (OD600 of 1). Bacterial cultures were directly diluted (100-fold) into aquaria containing 5 l of water and the water flow was stopped for 8 h. Then, the volume of aquarium water was increased to 10 l and fish were maintained in contact with bacteria for an additional 16 h to reach a total duration of 24 h. Planktonic bacteria were subsequently removed by restoring the flow. Instead of a bacterial culture, sterile TYES broth was used for the control group. Bacterial counts were determined at the beginning and at the end of the immersion challenge by plating serial dilutions of water samples on TYES agar. Water was maintained at 10 °C under continuous aeration during the experiment. Virulence was evaluated according to fish mortality during 28 days postinfection. Kaplan-Meier survival data were analyzed using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test with GraphPad Prism 8.4.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Sampling of intestinal contents

Sampling of intestinal content to characterize gut bacterial communities was performed at the end of the trial on day 90. Nine fish per diet were randomly chosen and euthanized by an overdose of filtered tricaine methane sulfonate solution (Sigma, 300 mg L− 1 ). The whole intestine (proximal and distal parts) was dissected under sterile conditions and the intestinal content was squeezed out individually into an Eppendorf tube and kept at − 80 °C until DNA extraction [61]. A total of 36 intestinal content samples were collected. In addition, four 2-ml samples of input water as well as 250 mg samples of each experimental feed were collected for analysis of their bacterial content.

DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing

Total bacterial DNA was extracted from each gut content sample using the QIAmp DNA Microbiome kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentrations were measured using a Nanodrop™ 1000 (Thermo Scientific Ltd.). Samples with DNA concentration > 10 ng μl− 1 with an absorbance ratio A260:A280 of > 1.8 were kept for further analysis. 16S rRNA gene amplification, library construction and sample sequencing were performed by PCR of the V3-V4 region with 5 ng of DNA and 200 nM of specific primers: forward primer 5′ TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′, and reverse primer 5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′ [62]. PCR products were purified using solid-phase reversible immobilization (SPRI) paramagnetic bead-based technology (AMPure XP beads, Beckman Coulter) with a bead:DNA ratio of 0.7:1 (v/v) and quantified using a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Invitrogen). Sequencing was performed at a final concentration of 4 pM with a 10% PhiX control library spike-in on a MiSeq instrument (Illumina Inc.) with 600 cycles v3 chemistry to generate 2 × 300 bp paired-end reads.

Sequence data processing and statistics

Raw 16S rRNA data were processed with QIIME2 (version qiime2–2019.4) [63]. The quality filtering, primer sequences removal, denoising, and Amplicon Single Variants (ASVs) estimation were performed using the DADA2 algorithm [64] implemented in the QIIME2 pipeline.

To estimate α- and β-diversity metrics on the ASVs data, we used the “core-metrics-phylogenetic” function from QIIME2. Analyses were performed at a depth of 43,800 reads per sample. We focused on the Shannon index (diversity) and the number of observed ASVs (richness) from the α-diversity metrics. A Kruskal-Wallis-Pairwise test with a Benjamini & Hochberg correction was applied to compare the metrics between groups of samples statistically. The metrics were represented in boxplots in R [65].

Differences in composition (β-diversity) between the different types of diet or sample were explored using a Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) using the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix. In addition, a PERMANOVA test was performed on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and Weighted Unifrac matrixes to determine whether the differences in bacterial composition between specific groups were significant. The CCA and the PERMANOVA analyses applied were implemented in the R package “Vegan” [66, 67].

The microbiome R package was used to determine the core by using the “core_members” function. Only taxa presented in all the samples of each group were included. The Venn diagram was drawn using an online tool: http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/. A bar plot of the bacterial composition was plotted by using the R package phyloseq [68].

Bacterial composition comparisons between diet conditions were performed by using Analysis of Composition of Microbiomes with Bias Correction (ANCOM-BC) [26]. This method identifies those taxa with statistically significant different abundances between groups of samples.

The association between the microbial community composition and quantitative variables was performed using the aGLMM-MiRKAT analysis implemented in the R package “GLMM-MiRKAT” [69]. The GLMM-MiRKAT is a distance-based kernel association test based on the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) correcting type I error rates.

Abbreviations

16S rRNA 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid
YEA Yeast
INS Insect
PAP Processed animal proteins
ASV Amplicon Single Variants
CCA Canonical Correspondence Analysis
ANCOM Analysis of composition of microbiomes
Publisher’s Note:

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgements

We thank Frédéric Terrier and his team from the INRAE experimental fish farm at Donzacq, France, for his help in feed preparation, and Cédric Fund from the Biomics Platform from the C2RT at Institut Pasteur, Paris, France, for 16S rRNA library construction and sequencing.

Authors’ contributions

D.P.-P., D.R., T.R., J.-F.B., E.D. and J.-M.G. designed the experiments. D.P.-P., D.R., T.R. and J.-F.B. performed the experiments. S.S. and Y.M. formulated and produced all diets. D.P.-P. and A.E.P.-C. generated and analyzed the sequencing data. D.R. and S.S. analyzed growth performance analysis. D.P.-P. and J.-M.G. wrote the paper with significant contributions from A.E.P.-C., T.R., J.-F.B. and E.D. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by an FUI AAP n°20 NINAQUA grant, by the French government’s Investissement d’Avenir Program, Laboratoire d’Excellence “Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases” (grant n°ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID) and the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (grant no. DEQ20180339185). D.P-P was supported by an Institut Carnot MS Postdoctoral fellowship. The Institut Pasteur C2RT is supported by a France Génomique grant (ANR-10-INBS-09-09).

Availability of data and materials

Raw sequences were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession number PRJEB41459.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments described in the present study were conducted at the IERP fish facilities (building agreement n°C78–720) of the INRAE Research Center at Jouy-en-Josas, France, in compliance with the recommendations of Directive 2010–63-EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. The protocols were approved by the institutional review ethics committee, COMETHEA, of the INRAE Research Center. Authorizations were approved by the Direction of the Veterinary Services of Versailles (authorization number APAFIS 2156–2015100215242446).

Consent for publication

All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. 

    FAO Organization FaA The state of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action 2020. Rome Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

2. 

    Naylor   RL , Hardy   RW , Bureau   DP , Chiu   A , Elliott   M , Farrell   AP , Forster   I , Gatlin   DM , Goldburg   RJ , Hua   K , Nichols   PD . Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009. 106: 36 15103-15110 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905235106

3. 

    Gatlin   DM , Barrows   FT , Brown   P , Dabrowski   K , Gaylord   TG , Hardy   RW , Herman   E , Hu   G , Krogdahl   Å , Nelson   R , . Expanding the utilization of sustainable plant products in aquafeeds: a review. Aquac Res 2007. 38: 6 551-579 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01704.x

4. 

    Parma   L , Yúfera   M , Navarro-Guillén   C , Moyano   FJ , Soverini   M , D'Amico   F , Candela   M , Fontanillas   R , Gatta   PP , Bonaldo   A . Effects of calcium carbonate inclusion in low fishmeal diets on growth, gastrointestinal pH, digestive enzyme activity and gut bacterial community of European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) juveniles. Aquaculture 2019. 510: 283-292 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.05.064

5. 

    Francis   G , Makkar   HPS , Becker   K . Antinutritional factors present in plant-derived alternate fish feed ingredients and their effects in fish. Aquaculture 2001. 199: 3 197-227 doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00526-9

6. 

    Santigosa   E , García-Meilán   I , Valentín   JM , Navarro   I , Pérez-Sánchez   J , Gallardo   . Plant oils' inclusion in high fish meal-substituted diets: effect on digestion and nutrient absorption in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Aquac Res 2011. 42: 7 962-974 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02679.x

7. 

    Kokou   F , Fountoulaki   E . Aquaculture waste production associated with antinutrient presence in common fish feed plant ingredients. Aquaculture 2018. 495: 295-310 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.003

8. 

    Rimoldi   S , Terova   G , Ascione   C , Giannico   R , Brambilla   F . Next generation sequencing for gut microbiome characterization in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed animal by-product meals as an alternative to fishmeal protein sources. PLoS One 2018. 13: 3 e0193652 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193652

9. 

    Øverland   M , Skrede   A . Yeast derived from lignocellulosic biomass as a sustainable feed resource for use in aquaculture. J Sci Food Agric 2017. 97: 3 733-742 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8007

10. 

Gómez B, Munekata PES, Zhu Z, Barba FJ, Toldrá F, Putnik P, Bursać Kovačević D, Lorenzo JM. Chapter Seven - Challenges and opportunities regarding the use of alternative protein sources: Aquaculture and insects. In: Toldrá F, editor. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, vol. 89. Cambridge, San Diego, Oxford and London: Academic Press; Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier. 2019. p. 259–95. 10.1016/bs.afnr.2019.03.003.

11. 

    Pelletier   N , Klinger   DH , Sims   NA , Yoshioka   J-R , Kittinger   JN . Nutritional attributes, substitutability, scalability, and environmental intensity of an illustrative subset of current and future protein sources for aquaculture feeds: joint consideration of potential synergies and trade-offs. Environ Sci Technol 2018. 52: 10 5532-5544 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05468

12. 

    Ringø   E , Zhou   Z , Vecino   JLG , Wadsworth   S , Romero   J , Krogdahl   Å , Olsen   RE , Dimitroglou   A , Foey   A , Davies   S , Owen   M , Lauzon   HL , Martinsen   LL , de Schryver   P , Bossier   P , Sperstad   S , Merrifield   DL . Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. A never-ending story?. Aquac Nutr 2016. 22: 2 219-282 doi: 10.1111/anu.12346

13. 

    Ghanbari   M , Kneifel   W , Domig   KJ . A new view of the fish gut microbiome: advances from next-generation sequencing. Aquaculture 2015. 448: 464-475 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.033

14. 

    Gómez   GD , Balcázar   JL . A review on the interactions between gut microbiota and innate immunity of fish. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2008. 52: 2 145-154 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00343.x

15. 

    Sullam   KE , Essinger   SD , Lozupone   CA , O’Connor   MP , Rosen   GL , Knight   R , Kilham   SS , Russell   JA . Environmental and ecological factors that shape the gut bacterial communities of fish: a meta-analysis. Mol Ecol 2012. 21: 13 3363-3378 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05552.x

16. 

    Kelly   C , Salinas   I . Under pressure: interactions between commensal microbiota and the teleost immune system. Front Immunol 2017. 8: 559 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00559

17. 

    Marques   A , Ollevier   F , Verstraete   W , Sorgeloos   P , Bossier   P . Gnotobiotically grown aquatic animals: opportunities to investigate host–microbe interactions. J Appl Microbiol 2006. 100: 5 903-918 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02961.x

18. 

    Semova   I , Carten Juliana   D , Stombaugh   J , Mackey Lantz   C , Knight   R , Farber Steven   A , Rawls John   F . Microbiota regulate intestinal absorption and metabolism of fatty acids in the zebrafish. Cell Host Microbe 2012. 12: 3 277-288 doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.003

19. 

    Wang   C , Chuprom   J , Wang   Y , Fu   L . Beneficial bacteria for aquaculture: nutrition, bacteriostasis and immunoregulation. J Appl Microbiol 2020. 128: 1 28-40 doi: 10.1111/jam.14383

20. 

    Starliper   CE . Bacterial Coldwater disease of fishes caused by Flavobacterium psychrophilum. J Adv Res 2011. 2: 2 97-108 doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2010.04.001

21. 

    Wong   S , Waldrop   T , Summerfelt   S , Davidson   J , Barrows   F , Kenney   PB , Welch   T , Wiens   GD , Snekvik   K , Rawls   JF , Good   C . Aquacultured rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss possess a large core intestinal microbiota that is resistant to variation in diet and rearing density. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013. 79: 16 4974-4984 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00924-13

22. 

    Shade   A , Handelsman   J . Beyond the Venn diagram: the hunt for a core microbiome. Environ Microbiol 2012. 14: 1 4-12 doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02585.x

23. 

    Terova   G , Rimoldi   S , Ascione   C , Gini   E , Ceccotti   C , Gasco   L . Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) gut microbiota is modulated by insect meal from Hermetia illucens prepupae in the diet. Rev Fish Biol Fish 2019. 29: 2 465-486 doi: 10.1007/s11160-019-09558-y

24. 

    Ricaud   K , Rey   M , Plagnes-Juan   E , Larroquet   L , Even   M , Quillet   E , Skiba-Cassy   S , Panserat   S . Composition of intestinal microbiota in two lines of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) divergently selected for muscle fat content. Open Microbiol J 2018. 12: 1 308-320 doi: 10.2174/1874285801812010308

25. 

    Yildirimer   CC , Brown   KH . Intestinal microbiota lipid metabolism varies across rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) phylogeographic divide. J Appl Microbiol 2018. 125: 6 1614-1625 doi: 10.1111/jam.14059

26. 

    Lin   H , Peddada   SD . Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat Commun 2020. 11: 1 3514 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17041-7

27. 

    Xiong   J-B , Nie   L , Chen   J . Current understanding on the roles of gut microbiota in fish disease and immunity. Zool Res 2019. 40: 2 70 doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.069

28. 

    Nematollahi   A , Decostere   A , Pasmans   F , Haesebrouck   F . Flavobacterium psychrophilum infections in salmonid fish. J Fish Dis 2003. 26: 10 563-574 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2003.00488.x

29. 

    Amin   N , Frank   P , Wim Van den B Richard Ducatelle   FH , Annemie   D . Association of Flavobacterium psychrophilum strains with intestinal explants of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Dis Aquat Org 2005. 67: 1–2 67-72

30. 

    Pérez-Pascual   D , Rochat   T , Kerouault   B , Gómez   E , Neulat-Ripoll   F , Henry   C , Quillet   E , Guijarro   JA , Bernardet   JF , Duchaud   E . More Than Gliding: Involvement of GldD and GldG in the Virulence of Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Front Microbiol 2017. 8: 2168 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02168

31. 

    Naylor   R , Hindar   K , Fleming   IA , Goldburg   R , Williams   S , Volpe   J , Whoriskey   F , Eagle   J , Kelso   D , Mangel   M . Fugitive Salmon: assessing the risks of escaped fish from net-pen aquaculture. BioScience 2005. 55: 5 427-437 doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0427:FSATRO]2.0.CO;2

32. 

    Roques   S , Deborde   C , Richard   N , Sergent   L , Kurz   F , Skiba-Cassy   S , Fauconneau   B , Moing   A . Characterizing alternative feeds for rainbow trout (O. mykiss) by (1)H NMR metabolomics. Metabolomics 2018. 14: 12 155 doi: 10.1007/s11306-018-1454-5

33. 

    Cid García   RA , Hernández Hernández   LH , Carrillo Longoria   JA , Fernández Araiza   MA . Inclusion of yeast and/or fructooligosaccharides in diets with plant-origin protein concentrates for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fingerlings. J World Aquacult Soc. 2019. 51: 4 970-81 doi: 10.1111/jwas.12661

34. 

    Burr   GS , Wolters   WR , Barrows   FT , Hardy   RW . Replacing fishmeal with blends of alternative proteins on growth performance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and early or late stage juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 2012. 334-337: 110-116 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.12.044

35. 

    Badillo   D , Herzka   SZ , Viana   MT . Protein retention assessment of four levels of poultry by-product substitution of fishmeal in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) diets using stable isotopes of nitrogen (δ15N) as natural tracers. PLoS One 2014. 9: 9 e107523 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107523

36. 

    Parés-Sierra   G , Durazo   E , Ponce   MA , Badillo   D , Correa-Reyes   G , Viana   MT . Partial to total replacement of fishmeal by poultry by-product meal in diets for juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and their effect on fatty acids from muscle tissue and the time required to retrieve the effect. Aquac Res 2014. 45: 9 1459-1469 doi: 10.1111/are.12092

37. 

    Panserat   S , Hortopan   GA , Plagnes-Juan   E , Kolditz   C , Lansard   M , Skiba-Cassy   S , Esquerré   D , Geurden   I , Médale   F , Kaushik   S , Corraze   G . Differential gene expression after total replacement of dietary fish meal and fish oil by plant products in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) liver. Aquaculture 2009. 294: 1 123-131 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.05.013

38. 

    Lazzarotto   V , Médale   F , Larroquet   L , Corraze   G . Long-term dietary replacement of fishmeal and fish oil in diets for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): effects on growth, whole body fatty acids and intestinal and hepatic gene expression. PLoS One 2018. 13: 1 e0190730 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190730

39. 

    Blaufuss   PC , Bledsoe   JW , Gaylord   TG , Sealey   WM , Overturf   KE , Powell   MS . Selection on a plant-based diet reveals changes in oral tolerance, microbiota and growth in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) when fed a high soy diet. Aquaculture 2020. 525: 735287 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735287

40. 

    Roques   S , Deborde   C , Guimas   L , Marchand   Y , Richard   N , Jacob   D , Skiba-Cassy   S , Moing   A , Fauconneau   B . Integrative Metabolomics for Assessing the Effect of Insect (Hermetia illucens) Protein Extract on Rainbow Trout Metabolism. Metabolites 2020. 10: 3 83 doi: 10.3390/metabo10030083

41. 

    Dehler   CE , Secombes   CJ , Martin   SAM . Environmental and physiological factors shape the gut microbiota of Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2017. 467: 149-157 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.07.017

42. 

    Bruni   L , Pastorelli   R , Viti   C , Gasco   L , Parisi   G . Characterisation of the intestinal microbial communities of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed with Hermetia illucens (black soldier fly) partially defatted larva meal as partial dietary protein source. Aquaculture 2018. 487: 56-63 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.01.006

43. 

    Apper   E , Weissman   D , Respondek   F , Guyonvarch   A , Baron   F , Boisot   P , Rodiles   A , Merrifield   DL . Hydrolysed wheat gluten as part of a diet based on animal and plant proteins supports good growth performance of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer), without impairing intestinal morphology or microbiota. Aquaculture 2016. 453: 40-48 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.11.018

44. 

    Desai   AR , Links   MG , Collins   SA , Mansfield   GS , Drew   MD , Van Kessel   AG , Hill   JE . Effects of plant-based diets on the distal gut microbiome of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 2012. 350-353: 134-142 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.005

45. 

    Ingerslev   H-C , Strube   ML , Jørgensen   LG , Dalsgaard   I , Boye   M , Madsen   L . Diet type dictates the gut microbiota and the immune response against Yersinia ruckeri in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish Shellfish Immunol 2014. 40: 2 624-633 doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.08.021

46. 

    Martinez   MP , Gonzalez Pereyra   ML , Pena   GA , Poloni   V , Fernandez Juri   G , Cavaglieri   LR . Pediococcus acidolactici and Pediococcus pentosaceus isolated from a rainbow trout ecosystem have probiotic and ABF1 adsorbing/degrading abilities in vitro. Food Addit Contam Part A 2017. 34: 12 2118-2130 doi: 10.1080/19440049.2017.1371854

47. 

    Ramos   MA , Gonçalves   JFM , Batista   S , Costas   B , Pires   MA , Rema   P , Ozório   ROA . Growth, immune responses and intestinal morphology of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) supplemented with commercial probiotics. Fish Shellfish Immunol 2015. 45: 1 19-26 doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.04.001

48. 

    Parma   L , Candela   M , Soverini   M , Turroni   S , Consolandi   C , Brigidi   P , Mandrioli   L , Sirri   R , Fontanillas   R , Gatta   PP , Bonaldo   A . Next-generation sequencing characterization of the gut bacterial community of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, L.) fed low fishmeal based diets with increasing soybean meal levels. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016. 222: 204-216 doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.10.022

49. 

    Gajardo   K , Jaramillo-Torres   A , Kortner   TM , Merrifield   DL , Tinsley   J , Bakke   AM , Krogdahl   Å . Alternative protein sources in the diet modulate microbiota and functionality in the distal intestine of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Appl Environ Microbiol 2017. 83: 5 e02615-e02616 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02615-16

50. 

    Theilmann   MC , Goh   YJ , Nielsen   KF , Klaenhammer   TR , Barrangou   R , Abou Hachem   M . Lactobacillus acidophilus Metabolizes Dietary Plant Glucosides and Externalizes Their Bioactive Phytochemicals. mBio 2017. 8: 6 e01421-e01417 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01421-17

51. 

    Ringø   E , Hoseinifar   SH , Ghosh   K , Doan   HV , Beck   BR , Song   SK . Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish—An Update. Front Microbiol 2018. 9: 1818 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01818

52. 

    Mian   GF , Godoy   DT , Leal   CAG , Yuhara   TY , Costa   GM , Figueiredo   HCP . Aspects of the natural history and virulence of S. agalactiae infection in Nile tilapia. Vet Microbiol 2009. 136: 1 180-183 doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.10.016

53. 

    Mente   E , Nikouli   E , Antonopoulou   E , Martin   SAM , Kormas   KA . Core versus diet-associated and postprandial bacterial communities of the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) midgut and faeces. Biology Open 2018. 7: 6 bio034397 doi: 10.1242/bio.034397

54. 

    Ni   J , Yan   Q , Yu   Y , Zhang   T . Factors influencing the grass carp gut microbiome and its effect on metabolism. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2014. 87: 3 704-714 doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12256

55. 

    Huyben   D , Vidaković   A , Werner Hallgren   S , Langeland   M . High-throughput sequencing of gut microbiota in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed larval and pre-pupae stages of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens). Aquaculture 2019. 500: 485-491 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.10.034

56. 

    Lacombe-Harvey   M-È , Brzezinski   R , Beaulieu   C . Chitinolytic functions in actinobacteria: ecology, enzymes, and evolution. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2018. 102: 17 7219-7230 doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9149-4

57. 

    Cai   Y , Benno   Y , Nakase   T , Oh   TK . Specific probiotic characterization of Weissella hellenica DS-12 isolated from flounder intestine. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1998. 44: 5 311-316 doi: 10.2323/jgam.44.311

58. 

    Meena   DK , Das   P , Kumar   S , Mandal   SC , Prusty   AK , Singh   SK , Akhtar   MS , Behera   BK , Kumar   K , Pal   AK , Mukherjee   SC . Beta-glucan: an ideal immunostimulant in aquaculture (a review). Fish Physiol Biochem 2013. 39: 3 431-457 doi: 10.1007/s10695-012-9710-5

59. 

    Petit   J , Wiegertjes   GF . Long-lived effects of administering β-glucans: indications for trained immunity in fish. Dev Comp Immunol 2016. 64: 93-102 doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2016.03.003

60. 

    Duchaud   E , Rochat   T , Habib   C , Barbier   P , Loux   V , Guerin   C , Dalsgaard   I , Madsen   L , Nilsen   H , Sundell   K , . Genomic diversity and evolution of the fish pathogen Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Front Microbiol 2018. 9: 138 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00138

61. 

    Perez-Pascual   D , Estelle   J , Dutto   G , Rodde   C , Bernardet   JF , Marchand   Y , Duchaud   E , Przybyla   C , Ghigo   JM . Growth Performance and Adaptability of European Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) Gut Microbiota to Alternative Diets Free of Fish Products. Microorganisms 2020. 8: 9 1346 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091346

62. 

    Klindworth   A , Pruesse   E , Schweer   T , Peplies   J , Quast   C , Horn   M , Glöckner   FO . Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 2012. 41: 1 e1 doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808

63. 

    Bolyen   E , Rideout   JR , Dillon   MR , Bokulich   NA , Abnet   CC , Al-Ghalith   GA , Alexander   H , Alm   EJ , Arumugam   M , Asnicar   F , . Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 2019. 37: 8 852-857 doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9

64. 

    Callahan   BJ , McMurdie   PJ , Rosen   MJ , Han   AW , Johnson   AJA , Holmes   SP . DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 2016. 13: 7 581-583 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869

65. 

    R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2019. Vienna R Foundation for Statistical Computing

66. 

    Oksanen   J , Blanchet   FG , Kindt   R , Legendre   P , Minchin   PR , O'Hara   RB , Simpson   GL , Solymos   P , Stevens   MHH , Wagner   H Vegan: community ecology package. R package vegan, vers. 2.2–1 2015.

67. 

    Lahti   L , Shetty   S , Ernst   FGM , Huang   R , Borman   T , Braccia   DC , Bravo   HC Tools for microbiome analysis in R. Version 2017.

68. 

    McMurdie   PJ , Holmes   S . phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 2013. 8: 4 e61217 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217

69. 

    Koh   H , Li   Y , Zhan   X , Chen   J , Zhao   N . A Distance-Based Kernel Association Test Based on the Generalized Linear Mixed Model for Correlated Microbiome Studies. Front Genet 2019. 10: 458 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00458
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
https://www.researchpad.co/tools/openurl?pubtype=article&doi=10.1186/s42523-021-00107-2&title=Sustainable plant-based diets promote rainbow trout gut microbiota richness and do not alter resistance to bacterial infection&author=&keyword=Rainbow trout,Gut microbiota,Sustainable aquaculture diet,Flavobacterium psychrophilum,&subject=Research Article,