Biodiversity Data Journal
Pensoft Publishers
A database of functional traits for spiders from native forests of the Iberian Peninsula and Macaronesia
Volume: 8
DOI 10.3897/BDJ.8.e49159

BackgroundThere is an increasing demand for databases including species trait information for biodiversity and community ecology studies. The existence of trait databases is useful for comparative studies within taxa or geographical regions, but there is low availability of databases for certain organisms. Here we present an open access functional trait database for spiders from Macaronesia and the Iberian Peninsula, recording several morphological and ecological traits related to the species life histories, microhabitat and trophic preferences.New informationWe present a database that includes 12 biological traits for 506 spider species present in natural forests of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain) and three Macaronesian archipelagoes (Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands). The functional trait database consists of two sections:individual-level data for six morphological traits (total body size, prosoma length, prosoma width, prosoma height, tibia I length and fang length), based on direct measurements of 2844 specimens of all spider species; andspecies-level aggregate data for 12 traits (same 6 morphological traits as in the previous section plus dispersal ability, vertical stratification, circadian activity, foraging strategy, trophic specialization and colonization status), based on either the average of the direct measurements or bibliographic searches.This functional trait database will serve as a data standard for currently ongoing analyses that require trait and functional diversity statistics.

Macías-Hernández, Ramos, Domènech, Febles, Santos, Arnedo, Borges, Emerson, and Cardoso: A database of functional traits for spiders from native forests of the Iberian Peninsula and Macaronesia


An increasing number of ecological studies are incorporating functional traits of organisms to understand global patterns of biodiversity (Díaz et al. 2015), community assembly (Kraft et al. 2008) and ecosystem functioning (de Bello et al. 2010). Functional traits allow us to understand the ecological role of organisms in the community, based on their features and on how the organisms interact in the ecosystem (Nock et al. 2016). Thus, trait based studies allow for the assessment of ecosystem functioning by using species biological traits as a proxy for the functional characteristics of the community assemblage (de Bello et al. 2010). Changes in the functional composition of species assemblages can be related to losses of ecosystem function (Mouillot et al. 2013).

Functional trait databases can be potentially useful for many scientific fields, helping to address questions in systematics, biogeography, macroecology, macroevolution or community assembly. Trait databases are valuable in phylogenetic comparative studies used for the reconstruction of ancestral morphology (Harmon et al. 2010) and to understand how different traits (i.e. body size) have evolved across phylogenetic clades (Kuntner and Coddington 2019), or to link genes with functions or phenotypes (Edmunds et al. 2015). Furthermore, trait-based studies are beneficial in conservation, helping to detect global change impacts or to predict if certain traits are correlated to extinction risk (Chichorro et al. 2019), or even to species invasiveness potential (Nyberg and Wallentinus 2005). Trait variation at intra (Garamszegi and Møller 2010) and interspecific levels (Kazakou et al. 2014) are valuable in comparative approaches or community ecology (Bolnick et al. 2011).

As a measure of the diversity of species niches and their functions, Functional Diversity (FD) has been used to understand how species richness or diversity relates to ecosystem function (Petchey and Gaston 2002, McGill et al. 2006, Petchey and Gaston 2006). It is often seen as reflecting a mechanistic link between taxonomic diversity and ecological processes (Cadotte et al. 2011). Given its implications, the selection of traits to quantify FD must be made with caution. Selected traits should reflect the functioning of species in ecosystems and allow understanding of the connection between FD and the response variable of interest according to individual hypotheses (Nock et al. 2016).

Spiders are among the most diverse and abundant predators in all habitats worldwide, being one of the most species-rich invertebrate orders with more than 48,400 described species (World Spider Catalog 2020). Spiders have been used as models in many ecological and evolutionary studies, including functional diversity studies from global (Cardoso et al. 2011) to regional (Cardoso 2012) scales, and methodological advances in phylogenetic and functional diversity analyses (Cardoso et al. 2014). Under this same framework, we are now building a series of analyses that require trait and FD-based statistics, for which the current compilation of traits will serve as a data standard.

We here present a functional trait database of spiders, selecting morphological and ecological traits related to species life histories, microhabitat and trophic preferences, allowing us to characterize the ecological roles of spiders in biological communities and their use of biotic and abiotic resources.

General description


Our database includes 12 biological traits related to morphology, dispersal ability, vertical stratification, circadian activity, foraging strategy and prey range for all Iberian (Spain) and Macaronesian (Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands) spiders collected during several projects (see funding details in the acknowledgements section). A total of 506 species are included (364 from the Iberian Peninsula, 31 from Azores, 42 from Madeira and 69 from Canary Islands), representing ca. 25% of all acaronesian and Iberian species. The data were collected directly from specimens (i.e. direct morphological measurements), from the field (i.e. vertical stratification and circadian activity), and from scientific publications (i.e. dispersal ability, foraging strategy and prey range).

Sampling methods

Study extent

Iberian Peninsula and Macaronesian archipelagoes. In the Iberian Peninsula, spider communities were sampled from white-oak (Quercus L.) woodlands across the Spanish National Parks Network: 4 plots in Picos de Europa, 2 plots in Ordesa and Monte Perdido, 2 plots in Aigüestortes i Estany de Sant Maurici, 2 plots in Monfragüe, 4 plots in Cabañeros and 2 plots in Sierra Nevada (Crespo et al. 2018). In the Macaronesian archipelagoes, spiders were collected from natural laurel forest distributed as follows: 6 plots in Pico and 10 plots in Terceira (Azores) (Malumbres-Olarte et al. 2019), 12 plots in Madeira (Malumbres-Olarte et al. 2020), 10 plots in Tenerife and 7 plots in La Gomera (Canary Islands). Morphological measurements were taken directly from all species of spiders collected using the standardized COBRA (Conservation Oriented Biodiversity Rapid Assessment) (Cardoso et al. 2009) sampling protocol.

Geographic coverage


Iberian Peninsula (Spain) and Macaronesian archipelagoes (Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands).


28.121925 and 43.17771 Latitude; -28.422854 and -6.0641 Longitude.

Taxonomic coverage


Araneae. The database contains 506 species, accounting for 39 families of spiders. Some morphospecies or cryptic species identified by DNA as different lineages (see Crespo et al. 2018) were also recorded. Taxonomic changes were checked and updated according to the World Spider Catalog (World Spider Catalog 2020).

Taxa included

RankScientific NameCommon Name

Traits coverage

This dataset contains six morphological traits, four ecological traits and two other traits related to origin and dispersal ability.

The database consists of two sections:

    • individual-level data for 6 morphological traits (total body size, prosoma length, prosoma width, prosoma height, tibia I length and fang length), based on direct measurements of 2844 specimens of 506 spider species; and
    • species-level aggregate data for 12 traits (the same 6 morphological traits as the previous section plus dispersal ability, vertical stratification, circadian activity, foraging strategy, trophic specialization and colonization status), based on either average direct measurements or bibliographic search.

Morphological traits, vertical stratification and nocturnality were extracted from the samples whenever possible. The combination of sampling methods provides us with direct information on the vertical stratum preferred by the species, from lower to higher stratification: pitfall traps (ground-dwelling species), vegetation sweeping (low vegetation species), active aerial searching and foliage beating (arboreal species). The time of day when species were collected (diurnal vs. nocturnal sampling) provides information about their circadian activity, although this can be biased given the methods used and should be used with caution. Species collected only in pitfall traps did not have such data, with information being extracted from the literature or based on our own field experience instead.

For morphological data, specimens were selected randomly from the available field collections and the measurements were made using a binocular stereoscope. All measurements are given in millimeters (mm). Each morphological trait was measured, whenever possible, for 10 individuals of each species, 5 females and 5 males. For some species only one individual of each sex (the specimen with median body size) was selected for measuring morphological traits other than body size.

In the second section, aggregate data at species level were taken as the average (by sex and total average) of the previous measures for morphological data when available, or from the literature when no individuals of a species could be measured. Additionally, the minimum and maximum ranges of body length for each sex were included. For vertical stratification and circadian activity, we calculated an index based on the collection data or, if not available, using the literature or personal knowledge of species. Other measures were taken from the literature, or often from personal experience with the species in the field.

1. Morphological traits (continuous variables) in millimeters (mm):

    Total body length: measurement of the distance between the front of the carapace (without the chelicerae) and the end of the abdomen (without spinnerets).
    Prosoma length: measurement of the maximum carapace length (without the chelicerae).
    Prosoma width: measurement of the maximum carapace width.
    Prosoma height: measurement of the maximum prosoma height (in lateral view).
    Tibia I length: measurement of the retrolateral length of the first tibia.
    Fang length: measurement of the maximum chelicerae fang length.

2. Ecological traits:

    Verticality (continuous variable): information about the vertical stratification (from epigean to arboreal), based on the information provided by the sampling methods with which the species were collected during fieldwork. One value was assigned to each sampling method (from lower to higher level): pitfall (0), sweeping (1), active aerial searching (2), and beating (3). A weighted mean considering the abundance was performed and this was divided by 3 to rescale the values to a range from 0 to 1. Lower values indicate ground-dwelling species, while higher values indicate arboreal species.
    Nocturnality (continuous variable): information about circadian activity (nocturnal/diurnal) of the species. Diurnal species were recorded as 0, nocturnal species as 1, and for species that can be either diurnal or nocturnal we took a value based on the proportion of individuals of each species active at night during sampling (we divided the number of specimens collected during the night by their total abundance). Values ranged from 0 to 1, with lower values indicating diurnal species and higher values indicating nocturnal species.
    Foraging strategy (eight binary variables; 0 no web - 1 web builders): information about the method of hunting or type of web the species builds. For the web-building species: capture web, sensing web, tube web, sheet web, space web and orb web (more than one feature can be true). For hunting species: ambush hunter and active hunter. The classification was usually made at genus level following the criteria described in Cardoso et al. (2011).
    Trophic specialization (binary variable): information about prey range: stenophagy (specialist species recorded as 1), and euryphagy (generalist species recorded as 0). The classification was generally made at genus level following the criteria described in Cardoso et al. (2011).

3. Other traits:

    Colonization status (categorical variable): for the species distributed in the Macaronesian archipelagoes, information about their origin was included: (E) endemic to the archipelago; (N) native non-endemic; and (I) introduced; according to the Canary Island (Macías-Hernández 2010), Madeira (Cardoso and Crespo 2008) and Azores (Cardoso et al. 2010) spider checklists. The origin status of some species from the Canary Islands was modified according to our knowledge of the species distribution and it will be updated in the public database "Banco de Datos de Biodi­versidad de Canarias" (
    Dispersal: information about dispersal ability was based on ballooning propensity (see also Carvalho and Cardoso 2014). Given the data in Bonte et al. 2003, Bell et al. 2005, Blandenier 2009, we considered as frequent (F) ballooners all species from the families that constituted more than 10% of aerial catches in past studies, in this case Linyphiidae and Araneidae. As occasional (O) ballooners those that made up between 1 and 10%. As rarely (R) or never ballooning species those where ballooning has never been detected or usually represents less than 1% of the catches in published ballooning studies.

Usage rights

Use license

Open Data Commons Attribution License

IP rights notes

All data in the database can be freely used. Please cite this publication or the resource when using newly presented data in your analyses.

Data resources

Data package title

Spiders Functional Trait Dataset. Macaronesia_Iberian Peninsula

Resource link

The data reported in this paper are deposited in the Figshare repository at

Number of data sets


Data set 1.

Data set name

Individual Spiders traits measurements

Data format


Number of columns



Detailed morphometric measurements dataset including all specimens (2844) of 506 spider species. Measurements in millimeters (mm). Abbreviations: NA: Not Applicable; CRBA: Animal Biodiversity Resource Center; DTP: Dalberto Teixeira Pombo Collection; DZUL: Department of Zoology, University of La Laguna; IPNA-CSIC: Instituto de Productos Naturales (CSIC); MZB: Museum of Zoology, Barcelona; UAc: University of Azores code; UB: University of Barcelona. Observations: (*) specimens whose body size (Total_body_length_mm) is obtained by the sum of cephalothorax plus abdomen; (**) for the columns Prosoma_length_mm and Prosoma_height_mm, measurements with two values separated by -, the first one does not take into account the prosoma protuberance and the second one does take it into account. All column headers (but species) are equivalent to Darwin Core archives from GBIF.

Data set 1.
Column labelColumn description
catalogNumberAn unique individual code for each specimen record within the data set or collection
collectionIDAn identifier for the collection or dataset from which the record was derived
institutionCodeThe name (or acronym) in use by the institution having custody of the object(s) or information referred to in the record
collectionCodeThe name, acronym, code, or initialism identifying the collection or data set from which the record was derived
familySpecies family
speciesSpecies name
sexSpecimen sex
stateProvinceProvince where the specimen was collected
countyCounty where the specimen was collected
localityLocality where the specimen was collected
decimalLatitudeDecimal latitude
decimalLongitudeDecimal longitude
Total_body_length_mmTotal body length
Prosoma_length_mmMaximum carapace length (without the chelicerae)
Prosoma_width_mmMaximum carapace width
Prosoma_height_mmMaximum carapace height (in lateral view)
Tibia_I_length_mmRetrolateral length of the first tibia
Fang_length_mmMaximum chelicerae fang length
ObservationsSpecial record observations

Data set 2.

Data set name

Aggregate Species Functional Traits

Data format


Number of columns



Summary of morphometric and ecological traits for 506 spider species. Abbreviations: (*) data taken from bibliography, specified in "Citation" column; (§) data from similar species/genera; #N/D: no associated code; NA: not applicable.

Data set 2.
Column labelColumn description
species_LsidLife Science Identifier from the World Spider Catalog
SpeciesSpecies name
AuthorSpecies author
FamilySpecies family
Coloniz_AZOSpecies origin for Azores
Coloniz_MADSpecies origin for Madeira
Coloniz_CANSpecies origin for Canary Islands
Body_length_min_f_mmMinimum body length female
Body_length_max_f_mmMaximum body length female
Body_length_min_m_mmMinimum body length male
Body_length_max_m_mmMaximum body length male
Body_length_avg_f_mmAverage body length female
Body_length_avg_m_mmAverage body length male
Body_length_avg_mmAverage body length
Prosoma_length_f_mmAverage carapace length female
Prosoma_length_m_mmAverage carapace length male
Prosoma_length_avg_mmAverage of carapace length
Prosoma_width_f_mmAverage carapace width female
Prosoma_width_m_mmAverage carapace width male
Prosoma_width_avg_mmAverage of carapace width
Prosoma_height_f_mmAverage carapace height female
Prosoma_height_m_mmAverage carapace height male
Prosoma_height_avg_mmAverage of carapace height
Tibia_I_length_f_mmAverage of retrolateral length of the first tibia female
Tibia_I_length_m_mmAverage of retrolateral length of the first tibia male
Tibia_I_length_avg_mmAverage of retrolateral length of the first tibia
Fang_length_f_mmAverage chelicerae fang length female
Fang_length_m_mmAverage chelicerae fang length male
Fang_length_avg_mmAverage of chelicerae fang length
CitationBibliography from where some measurements were taken if specimens were not available
DispersalDispersal ability as (F)requent, (O)ccasional or (R)are ballooners
VerticalityVertical stratification (from 0 - epigean to 1 - arboreal)
NocturnalityCircadian activity (from 0 - diurnal to 1 - nocturnal)
Capture_webBinary (web used for capturing prey)
Sensing_webBinary (web used to detect prey)
No_webBinary (no web used for hunting)
Tube_webBinary (tube-shaped web)
Sheet_webBinary (sheet-shaped web)
Space_webBinary (space, tridimensional-shaped web)
Orb_webBinary (orb-shaped web)
Ambush_hunterBinary (hunt by ambushing prey)
Active_hunterBinary (hunt actively)
Trophic specializationPrey range (stenophagous or euriphagous)
ObservationsSpecial record observations


This study was supported by the project BIODIV ISLAND-CONT (Biodiversity drivers on islands and continents – 706482) funded by Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (H2020-MSCA-IF-2015) to the first author NMH. The research was additionally funded by three other projects that provided the material collected for the database:

    • the ERA-Net Net-Biome research framework, financed through Portuguese FCT-NETBIOME grant 0003/2011 (PB);
    • FCT MACDIV – FCT-PTDC/BIABIC/0054/2014 (PB, BE, PC);
    • the Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales Spain (OAPN #485/2012) (MA).

Additional support was provided by grant 2017SGR83 from the Catalan Government to MA. PB and PC are supported by AZORESBIOPORTAL–PORBIOTA (ACORES-01-0145-FEDER-000072) for the development of Functional Traits for Azorean arthropods. MD is supported by an APIF PhD fellowship from the University of Barcelona. We also thank Rutger Vos and Martin Ramirez for their valuable comments that greatly helped to improve the quality of this paper.

Author contributions

CR, MD, SF and IS measured the specimens. PC collected information about ecological traits at genus level. NMH wrote the manuscript with support from PC. CR made the tables. All authors commented on different versions of the manuscript.



    Bell JR, Bohan DA, Shaw EM, Weyman GS 2005. . Ballooning dispersal using silk: world fauna, phylogenies, genetics and models. Bulletin of Entomological Research 95: 2, pp.69-114, doi: 10.1079/BER2004350


    Blandenier Gilles 2009. . Ballooning of spiders (Araneae) in Switzerland: general results from an eleven-year survey. Arachnology 14: 7, pp.308-316, doi: 10.13156/arac.2009.14.7.308


    Bolnick Daniel I, Amarasekare Priyanga, Araújo Márcio S, Bürger Reinhard, Levine Jonathan M, Novak Mark, Rudolf Volker HW, Schreiber Sebastian J, Urban Mark C, Vasseur David A 2011. . Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 4, pp.183-192


    Bonte Dries, Vandenbroecke Nele, Lens Luc, Maelfait Jean-Pierre 2003. . Low propensity for aerial dispersal in specialist spiders from fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 270: 1524, pp.1601-1607, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2432


    Cadotte Marc W, Carscadden Kelly, Mirotchnick Nicholas 2011. . Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 5, pp.1079-1087, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x


    Cardoso Pedro, Crespo Luís 2008. AraneaeBorges P. A.V., et al. A list of the terrestrial fungi, flora and fauna of Madeira and Selvagens archipelagos Direcção Regional do Ambiente da Madeira and Universidade dos Açores, Funchal and Angra do Heroísmo3



    Cardoso Pedro, Wunderlich Joerg, Borges Paulo 2010. AraneaeBorges P. A. V., et al. A list of the terrestrial and marine biota from the Azores Principia, Oeiras, Portugal3


    Cardoso Pedro, Pekár Stano, Jocqué Rudy, Coddington J. A. 2011. . Global patterns of guild composition and functional diversity of spiders. PLOS One 6: 6, pp.e21710, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021710


    Cardoso Pedro 2012. . Diversity and community assembly patterns of epigean vs. troglobiont spiders in the Iberian Peninsula. International Journal of Speleology 41: 1, pp.83-94, doi: 10.5038/1827-806X.41.1.9


    Cardoso Pedro, Rigal François, Carvalho José C., Fortelius Mikael, Borges Paulo A. V., Podani Janos, Schmera Denes 2014. . Partitioning taxon, phylogenetic and functional beta diversity into replacement and richness difference components. Journal of Biogeography 41: 4, pp.749-761, doi: 10.1111/jbi.12239


    Carvalho José C., Cardoso Pedro 2014. . Drivers of beta diversity in Macaronesian spiders in relation to dispersal ability. Journal of Biogeography 41: 10, pp.1859-1870, doi: 10.1111/jbi.12348


    Chichorro Filipe, Juslén Aino, Cardoso Pedro 2019. . A review of the relation between species traits and extinction risk. Biological Conservation 237: , pp.220-229


    Crespo Luís C, Domènech Marc, Enguídanos Alba, Malumbres-Olarte Jagoba, Cardoso Pedro, Moya-Laraño Jordi, Frías-López Cristina, Macías-Hernández Nuria, De Mas Eva, Mazzuca Paola, Mora Elisa, Opatova Vera, Planas Enric, Ribera Carles, Roca-Cusachs Marcos, Ruiz Dolores, Sousa Pedro, Tonzo Vanina, Arnedo Miquel A. 2018. . A DNA barcode-assisted annotated checklist of the spider (Arachnida, Araneae) communities associated to white oak woodlands in Spanish National Parks. Biodiversity Data Journal 6: , pp.e29443, doi: 10.3897/BDJ.6.e29443


    de Bello Francesco, Lavorel Sandra, Díaz Sandra, Harrington Richard, Cornelissen Johannes HC, Bardgett Richard D, Berg Matty P, Cipriotti Pablo, Feld Christian K, Hering Daniel 2010. . Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodiversity & Conservation 19: 10, pp.2873-2893, doi: 10.1007/s10531-010-9850-9


    Díaz Sandra, Kattge Jens, Cornelissen Johannes H. C., Wright Ian J., Lavorel Sandra, Dray Stéphane, Reu Björn, Kleyer Michael, Wirth Christian, Colin Prentice I., Garnier Eric, Bönisch Gerhard, Westoby Mark, Poorter Hendrik, Reich Peter B., Moles Angela T., Dickie John, Gillison Andrew N., Zanne Amy E., Chave Jérôme, Joseph Wright S., Sheremet’ev Serge N., Jactel Hervé, Baraloto Christopher, Cerabolini Bruno, Pierce Simon, Shipley Bill, Kirkup Donald, Casanoves Fernando, Joswig Julia S., Günther Angela, Falczuk Valeria, Rüger Nadja, Mahecha Miguel D., Gorné Lucas D. 2015. . The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529: 7585, pp.167-171, doi: 10.1038/nature16489


    Edmunds Richard C, Su Baofeng, Balhoff James P, Eames B Frank, Dahdul Wasila M, Lapp Hilmar, Lundberg John G, Vision Todd J, Dunham Rex A, Mabee Paula M 2015. . Phenoscape: identifying candidate genes for evolutionary phenotypes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1, pp.13-24


    Garamszegi László Z, Møller Anders P 2010. . Effects of sample size and intraspecific variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta‐analytic review. Biological Reviews 85: 4, pp.797-805


    Harmon Luke J, Losos Jonathan B, Jonathan Davies T, Gillespie Rosemary G, Gittleman John L, Bryan Jennings W, Kozak Kenneth H, McPeek Mark A, Moreno‐Roark Franck, Near Thomas J 2010. . Early bursts of body size and shape evolution are rare in comparative data. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution 64: 8, pp.2385-2396


    Kazakou Elena, Violle Cyrille, Roumet Catherine, Navas Marie‐Laure, Vile Denis, Kattge Jens, Garnier Eric 2014. . Are trait‐based species rankings consistent across data sets and spatial scales?. Journal of Vegetation Science 25: 1, pp.235-247


    Kraft Nathan JB, Valencia Renato, Ackerly David D 2008. . Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science 322: 5901, pp.580-582, doi: 10.1126/science.1160662


    Kuntner Matjaž, Coddington Jonathan A 2019. . Sexual Size Dimorphism: Evolution and Perils of Extreme Phenotypes in Spiders. Annual Review of Entomology 65:


    Macías-Hernández N. 2010. AraneaeArechavaleta M., et al. Lista de especies silvestres de Canarias (hongos, plantas y animales terrestres) 10


    Malumbres-Olarte Jagoba, Cardoso Pedro, Crespo Luís Carlos Fonseca, Gabriel Rosalina, Pereira Fernando, Carvalho Rui, Rego Carla, Nunes Rui, Ferreira Maria Teresa, Amorim Isabel R., Rigal François, Borges Paulo A. V. 2019. . Standardised inventories of spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) of Macaronesia I: The native forests of the Azores (Pico and Terceira islands). Biodiversity Data Journal 7: , pp.e32625, doi: 10.3897/BDJ.7.e32625


    Malumbres-Olarte Jagoba, Boieiro Mário, Cardoso Pedro, Carvalho Rui, Crespo Luís Carlos Fonseca, Gabriel Rosalina, Macías Hernández Nuria, Paulo Octávio S., Pereira Fernando, Rego Carla, Ros-Prieto Alejandra, Silva Isamberto, Vieira Ana, Rigal François, Borges Paulo A. V. 2020. . Standardised inventories of spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) of Macaronesia II: The native forests and dry habitats of Madeira archipelago (Madeira and Porto Santo islands). Biodiversity Data Journal 8: , doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e47502



    Mouillot David, Graham N. A. J, Villéger Sébastien, Mason N. W. H., Bellwood D R 2013. . A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 3, pp.167-177, doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.004



    Nyberg Cecilia D, Wallentinus Inger 2005. . Can species traits be used to predict marine macroalgal introductions?. Biological Invasions 7: 2, pp.265-279


    Petchey Owen L., Gaston Kevin J. 2006. . Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecology Letters 9: 6, pp.741-758, doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x


    Petchey Owen L, Gaston Kevin J 2002. . Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecology Letters 5: 3, pp.402-411, doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00339.x


    Catalog World Spider. World spider catalog. Natural History Museum Bern. http://wsc.nmbe.ch2020-02-15T00:00:00+02:00 database of functional traits for spiders from native forests of the Iberian Peninsula and Macaronesia&author=Nuria Macías-Hernández,Cândida Ramos,Marc Domènech,Sara Febles,Irene Santos,Miquel A. Arnedo,Paulo A.V. Borges,Brent C. Emerson,Pedro Cardoso,&keyword= Araneae ,ecology,forest,morphology,Portugal,Spain,&subject=Data Paper (Biosciences),Biodiversity & Conservation,