At the beginning of March 2020, South Africa (59 million inhabitants) was hit by the pandemic of COVID-19 and soon became the most affected country in Africa by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. From one single case on March 5th, the number of cases increased rapidly, forcing the South-African Government to swiftly react and place the country under strict lockdown for six weeks. The strategy of the South African Government bore fruits with a contained spread of the virus. If the number of positive cases at the end of the lockdown reached 5647, the number of fatal casualties was limited to 103 deaths. The lockdown was overall well respected, even if serious problems of food supply soon occurred in informal settlements, leading to riots and confrontation with security forces. Indeed, populations were obedient, but not being able to practice sport or outdoors activities appeared heavy. The constant fear of the poorest not to have enough money to pay rent and buy food (even if the Government organised food parcels’ distributions), and to find less and less work was echoed by the fear of losing jobs among those more privileged. Despite the risk of an economic crisis, the South African Government has continued on the reasonable path of containing the pandemic with ending the lockdown at a slow pace, in five phases.
South Africa has not been spared by the COVID-19 pandemic. In a context of global public-health disaster, it is interesting to see how the most affected country in Africa dealt with the crisis.
South African population is currently estimated at 59 million . This population is rather young, with a median age of 27.6 years old , hiding important disparities between provinces. The Eastern Cape, the poorest province in the country, is also the youngest one with a median age of 21 years old, whereas, in the more developed provinces of Gauteng and Western Cape, the median age is at 29 and 28 years old, respectively.
In the same vein, and because of its segregationist history, South Africa is still the most unequal country in the world with a Gini-coefficient of 0.63 . This translates, for instance, in 14% of South Africans living in informal settlements , without proper housing, limited access to sanitation and water and an overall unemployment rate of 29% .
It is in this context that South Africa entered the fight against COVID-19 in March 2020, with the first declared positive case on March 5th in KwaZulu Natal. This person, considered as “patient” zero, came back to South Africa on 1 March from Milan, Italy. Faced by a rapid increase of cases in the following days, the South African Government swiftly reacted and imposed on 23 March a strict lockdown on the population for three weeks starting on 26 March. At that stage, the number of official positive cases had risen to 554, without any deaths.
The lockdown, further extended to 30 April, was the most restrictive on the African continent, and one of the most restrictive in the world. Shops, restaurants and non-essential businesses were closed, the population was only authorised to leave home for essential grocery shopping and medical reasons; no social, outdoors activities, sports or dog-walking were authorised, and a total ban on alcohol and cigarettes was imposed.
The lockdown was at the image of the country: diverse and contrasting. Among the middle class, the lockdown was particularly well respected . People, in general, stayed at home, managed to work remotely with access to the Internet and families were often happy together.
The situation was otherwise in poorest areas and informal settlements . Promiscuity was a problem together with lack of proper sanitation , which made everybody fear for a human catastrophe if the virus was to spread in these communities. In actual facts, the main issue resided in the lack of food and financial resources, which lead to “hunger riots” , shop looting  and confrontation with police .
Distribution of food parcels  for the poorest communities was organised, but it seems that for many, it was not enough, even though several associations and individuals helped in providing food and helping with distribution .
Two trends in domestic violence were noted: sharp decline in domestic abuse due to alcohol, whereas domestic violence against women increased by the third week of lockdown . Overall, violent crimes decreased , to even see gangs working together to feed communities .
Contrarily to what sometimes happened in Europe, it seems that South Africa did not suffer from ostracism of medical professionals because of the fear that those medical staff could carry the virus , . The respect of South Africans for nurses and medical doctors together with the limited number of positive cases did not open the door to inappropriate behaviours . However, medical staff did not go through these first two months of pandemic without casualties: more than 500 health workers were tested positive. As per 6 May, twenty-six medical doctors had been hospitalised and two health workers, a doctor and a nurse had died from the coronavirus . As a result, nurses refused to continue working in some clinics close to Cape Town when some colleagues of them were tested positive .
Overall, the response from South Africa to the dread of the pandemic seemed quite organised, and the response of the population was calm and composed. Considering this situation, we tried to collect some information running a small quick assessment to better understand the feeling of the selected individuals regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown.
Of course, such a quick assessment did not mean to replace a large-scale socio-economic and demographic survey, but at that stage, we aimed, at least, at reflecting on personal feelings.
This quick assessment took place on 24 April, questions were sent via emails and text messages to more than forty people from different backgrounds and residing in different areas of the country. Respondents were from the top middle-class, middle class and poorer backgrounds. Living arrangements also covered different settings with some respondents being confined with families while others were alone, in formal or informal housing. Age-wise, we reached people from twenty to seventy-five years old.
We were interested to know the conditions of the lockdown, and the state of mind of people confined, at that time, for little more than a month. Thirty-two people responded on the same day to the set of six questions: “According to your own experience: Was the lockdown well respected?; What were the biggest issues/challenges with the lockdown?; Was there a lot of “misconducts” reported to the police?; Was there any intimidation for nurses/assistant nurses/doctors/people working at hospital, for instance asking them to move house or to stay totally indoors, etc?; Was there an increase in domestic violence?; Please share anything that you consider important to note on a human/psychological point of view”.
Overall, responses were very homogenous based on the situation of the respondents.
Respondents from the middle class living in formal housing answered that the lockdown was strictly respected in their areas. Many of them had not gone out during the last four weeks, even not for grocery shopping that they’d rather ordered online to be delivered to their doors. Staying indoors was considered a real issue by all respondents from the middle class, who were all missing sport and outdoors activities.
In informal settlements, respondents from poorer backgrounds stated that the lockdown was not always respected as people needed to find food. Those same respondents further stated that the biggest fear was not to be able to return to work, or find work, to earn a leaving to feed their families. Such a worry was shared by all respondents to a certain extent. Those with stable jobs were also concerned about the economic situation and the possibility to lose their jobs, but they also systematically stated fearing for the situation of the less privileged whom they knew and who were fighting for food. The biggest fear remained for all to fall sick or that a family member became infected.
None of the people interviewed, even in informal settlements, stated problems with reporting cases of misconduct to police: the consistent answer was that the lockdown was generally well respected, so there was no need of reporting to police.
Concerning domestic violence, respondents generally agreed that thanks to the ban of alcoholic beverages, domestic violence seemed to have decreased, and this especially in poorer areas.
Finally, we observed that those who were confined with family members were systemically more optimistic than those confined alone. Those staying with families explained that their days were filled with family activities (once they had finished working/studying remotely), whereas those alone were getting bored and were more involved with anxiety inducing activities such as reading and watching the news throughout the day, and thinking about the situation.
On 24 April, President Ramaphosa unveiled a deconfinement plan in phases or “alert levels”. This plan, organised in five stages, made provision for gradual reopening of the economy and social life as per 1 May. Stage four allowed reopening of a limited number of economic sectors with high economic or social value, authorised again trading of cigarettes and alcohol at certain times, but maintained confinement of the general population. Jogging and short walks were allowed (on the morning of 1 May, cities’ boardwalks were packed with joggers and walkers), but a curfew was implemented between 20 h and 5am. Subsequent phases were to see restrictions lifted as the alert levels decrease. This clear system was organised in a way that the alert levels would move up or down depending on the level of the pandemic.
With challenges and many successes, South Africa has managed to flatten the curve of COVID-19 pandemic , as displayed below. At the end of the lockdown “phase 5”, on 30 April, the country bewailed 5647 confirmed positive cases and 103 officially declared deaths (Fig. 1 ).
To continue containing the crisis, the Government chose to “deconfine” at a slow pace, respecting a five-phase plan. South Africa also received support from Cuban medical doctors that arrived in the country on 26 April . South African authorities planned for transformation of stadiums into hospitals  in case of outbreak. Economically wise, the Government projected to inject 26 billion USD into the economy, especially to help small and medium businesses, which suffered from the halt in trading.
The country seemed to have successfully controlled and planned the different phases of the pandemic. As per 7 May 2020, the next step was to enter winter season and its uncertainties and to deal with relaxed restrictions, hoping that the curve of the pandemic remained stable and soon decreased.