BackgroundEmerging evidence suggests that circular RNAs (circRNAs) are vital regulators in a range of cancers. “miRNA sponge” is the most reported role played by circRNAs in many tumors. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 pathway plays a key role in the development and progression of many cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the study is to establish the potential clinical value and driving molecular mechanisms of circRNAs in CRC.Materials and MethodsReal-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to measure the circRUNX1 expression in 52 tissue samples from CRC patients. We verified the tumor promotor role of circRUNX1 in cell-based in vitro and in vivo assays. Human growth factor array was used to identify circRUNX1-regulated signaling pathways. We then used a double luciferase reporter assay and RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization to identify the downstream miR-145-5p of circRUNX1. Furthermore, we performed Western blotting and biological function assays to demonstrate if the circRUNX1/miR-145-5p/IGF1 axis is responsible for the proliferation of CRC cells and promotes CRC development.ResultsBy performing qRT-PCR from CRC tissues and paired adjacent normal mucosa tissues, we identified that circRUNX1 expression was significantly upregulated in CRC tissues and positively related with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and advanced tumor-node-metastasis tumor stage in patients. Functionally, circRUNX1 knockdown inhibited cell proliferation and migration and promoted apoptosis, whereas its overexpression exerted opposite effects. In vivo, circRUNX1 promoted tumor growth and metastasis. Mechanically, circRUNX1 shared miRNA response elements with IGF1. circRUNX1 competitively bound to miR-145-5p and prevented miR-145-5p from decreasing the expression of IGF1, which facilitated tumor growth.ConclusionOur studies verified that circRUNX1 functions as a tumor promotor in CRC cells by targeting the miR-145-5p/IGF1 signaling pathway and may have potential use as a prognostic indicator and therapeutic target in CRC patients.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the world, accounting for nearly 9% of cancer cases.1,2 Although classical pharmacological treatment and surgery strategies have improved, no effective target therapy has been validated in CRC. Therefore, it is essential to identify more efficient molecular targets and new potential biomarkers for CRC therapy and monitoring.
Several novel therapeutic agents for CRC have been investigated in recent years, especially noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs).3,4 circRNA has emerged as a new noncoding RNA which is vital in tumor initiation and development.5,6 Compared with the traditional linear RNA, circRNA is characterized by a covalently closed loop without terminal 5ʹ caps and 3ʹ polyadenylated tails.7 Although circRNAs are expressed at low levels, they are naturally resistant to degradation by exonucleases and have long half-lives.8 Previous studies have verified that circRNAs participate in various cell biological activities, including RNA binding protein regulators, miRNA-binding sponges and protein translation templates.9,10 Although enormous circRNAs have been identified by RNA sequencing, little is known regarding their biological function in the pathogenesis of CRC.
IGF1 is a circulating endocrine hormone that is a major regulator of growth and metabolism.11 It is therefore not surprising that transcriptional changes in IGF1 can induce cancer development and progression.12,13 Many studies have shown the ability of the IGF1 pathway to promote colorectal tumorigenesis and metastasis.14,15 IGF1 is targeted by 11 miRNAs including miR-145-5p, and miR-145-5p has been reported to function as a tumor suppressor in CRC. Down-regulation of IGF1 levels can inhibit tumor growth, and has been considered as an attractive strategy for potential treatment of CRC patients.
In our study, we identified circRUNX1 (hsa_circ_0002360), which derived from the exon region of the RUNX1 gene, is significantly upregulated in CRC tissues. Further analyses have indicated that circRUNX1 acts as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) for miR-145-5p to upregulate IGF1, which subsequently contributes to tumorigenesis and progression in CRC. Our results indicated that circRUNX1 can be seen as a novel biomarker of and potential therapeutic target for CRC.
Fifty-two paired samples of tumor tissues and adjacent normal mucosal tissues were obtained from surgical resection of CRC patients without preoperative chemoradiotherapy at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital (Beijing, China) during 2018 and 2019. All resected fresh tissues were immediately infiltrated in RNAlater (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and stored at −80°C. All of the pathologic specimens were histologically verified by two pathologists independently. This project was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all enrolled patients. Clinicopathologic features of patients are summarized in Table 1.
|Clinicopathologic Features||Total (n = 52)||circRUNX1 Expressiona||p value|
|≥65||27||13 (48.1%)||14 (51.9%)||0.78|
|<65||25||13 (52.0%)||12 (48.0%)|
|Male||28||15 (53.6%)||13 (46.4%)||0.58|
|Female||24||11 (45.8%)||13 (54.2%)|
|Tumor size (cm)|
|≥5||25||14 (56.0%)||11 (44.0%)||0.41|
|<5||27||12 (44.4%)||15 (55.6%)|
|Poor||7||4 (57.1%)||3 (42.9%)||1.00|
|High||45||22 (48.9%)||23 (51.1%)|
|Rectum||17||9 (52.9%)||8 (47.1%)||0.77|
|Colon||35||17 (48.6%)||18 (51.4%)|
|Depth of invasion|
|T3/T4||45||21 (46.7%)||24 (53.3%)||0.42|
|T1/T2||7||5 (71.4%)||2 (28.6%)|
|Lymph node metastasis|
|N1/N2||21||15 (71.4%)||6 (28.6%)||0.01**|
|N0||31||11 (35.5%)||20 (64.5%)|
|M1||5||5 (100%)||0 (0%)||0.05*|
|M0||47||21 (44.7%)||26 (55.3%)|
|TNM tumor stage|
|III+ IV||22||16 (72.7%)||6 (27.3%)||0.01**|
|I+II||30||10 (33.3%)||20 (66.7%)|
|Present||29||15 (51.7%)||14 (48.3%)||0.78|
|Absent||23||11 (47.8%)||12 (52.2%)|
All human CRC cells (SW480, SW620, HCT116, HT29, LoVo and RKO) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. Cells were tested negative for mycoplasma contamination before experiment. SW480, SW620, LoVo and RKO cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Biological Industries, Cromwell, CT, USA) with 10% FBS; HCT116 and HT29 cells were cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium with 10% FBS. Cells were all cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Total RNA was extracted from CRC tissues and cells with Trizol (Invitrogen). The cDNA of circRUNX1 was synthesized using reverse transcription PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). In order to measure the abundance of transcripts, qPCR of circRUNX1 was conducted using TB Green™ Premix Ex Taq™ II Kit (TaKaRa); 18S rRNA was utilized as an internal control. The 2−ΔCt or 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the relative expression of RNA. All the primers in this study were expressed as follows: circRUNX1 forward: 5′-TCCCTGAACCACTCCACTGC-3′, reverse: 5′-GACTTGCGGTGGGTTTGTGA-3′; 18S rRNA forward: 5′-AAACGGCTACCACATCCA-3′, reverse: 5′-CACCAGACTTGCCCCTCCA-3′.
Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) which target the back-splice junction sequences of circRUNX1, miR-145-5p mimics, and their respective NC oligonucleotides were designed and synthesized from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). The oligonucleotides were transfected into CRC cells using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Invitrogen) at a final concentration of 75 nM. The sequences of oligonucleotides were as follows: si-circRUNX1#1: 5′-GAGUCAGAUGCAGGGGAAATT-3′; si-circRUNX1#2: 5′-AGAUGCAGGGGAAAAGCUUTT-3′; miR-145-5p: 5′-GUCCAGUUUUCCCAGGAAUCCCU-3′; negative control: 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′.
Lentiviruses expressing circRUNX1 were purchased from Hanbio (Shanghai, China). For lentivirus constructs, the CDS (Coding sequence) of circRUNX1 was inserted into pHBLV-CMV-MCS-EF1-puro lentiviral vectors (Hanbio). The constructed vectors were packaged into lentiviruses. To establish stable cell lines, CRC cells were infected with lentiviruses with or without circRUNX1 at MOI 1 in the presence of 6 μg/mL polybrene. Approximately 48 h after infection, the medium was changed, and puromycin was added for selection of stable transfected cells. Puromycin-resistant colonies were selected for 1–2 weeks and then expanded. Gene modification via lentiviral delivery was confirmed by qRT-PCR.
The circRUNX1 probe sequence, which was administrated by Cy3-labeled at the 5ʹ end, was 5ʹ-GTCAGAGTGAAGCTTTTCCCCTGCATCTGACTCTGAGGCT-3ʹ. The 5ʹ FAM-labeled miR-145-5p probe sequence was 5ʹ-AGGGA+TTCCTGGGAAAAC+TGGAC-3ʹ. These probes were all synthesized by GenePharma. FISH staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (GenePharma). DAPI was used to stain the cell nuclei. A confocal laser scanning microscope (TCS SP8; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) was used to observe the subcellular distribution of circRUNX1 and miR-145-5p in CRC cells.
Briefly, 103 CRC cells were resuspended and plated into each well of a six-well plate and incubated at 37°C for 2 weeks. The cell colonies were observed after fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and staining with 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min. Pictures were acquired soon after staining, and colonies were counted and analyzed.
Cell proliferation assay was tested with the CCK-8 kit (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). Approximately 103 cells were resuspended and plated into 96-well plates and cultured for different time periods, respectively (0, 24, 48, 72 or 96h). Then each well was added with 10 μL CCK-8 reagent. After incubation for 2 h, absorbance at 450 nM was assessed using a microtiter plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The data of the OD-measuring were used to reflect cell proliferation rates. Cells in each group were performed for five replicates.
For invasion and migration assay, cells in suspension (serum-free medium) were seeded into migration chambers (Corning, NY, USA) present in the insert of a 24-well culture plate. Matrigel (Corning) was prepared at the bottom of the PC Membrane in advance for the invasion assays. Medium containing 20% fetal bovine serum was added to the lower chambers. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h or 48 h (for migration assays or invasion assays), the cells in the upper chambers were removed, and paraformaldehyde was used to fix the remaining cells. Cells in five random 100× fields were counted to calculate the invasion and migration cell number using a Leica DM4000B microscope (Leica).
Cell apoptosis and cell cycle assays were performed using flow cytometry analysis (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). For apoptosis experiments, CRC cells were collected and re-suspended with 500 μL binding buffer. FITC and PI (KeyGen Biotech, Nanjing, China) were added and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Samples were instantly analyzed by flow cytometry. And for cell cycle assay, CRC cells were collected and mixed with 75% ethanol at 4°C overnight. Cells were labeled with PI/RNase Staining Buffer for 30 min before detection. The data were analyzed by flow cytometer FACSCalibur (De Novo Software, Los Angeles, CA, USA).
All animal studies were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Capital Medical University, and were performed in compliance with the Animal Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China-2009 for experimental animals. Male BALB/c nude mice aged 6–8 weeks were housed under standard conditions and conformed to the Guide for the Care. 2×106 HCT116 cells (circRUNX1 over-expression plasmid or mock vector) were subcutaneously inoculated into the dorsal flanks of mice (eight in each group). The volume of tumors was evaluated every 3 days by the following formula: (length × width2)/2. 15 days later, mice were killed and tumors were measured.
In the experiments of liver metastases, 2×106 cells were intravenously injected into the spleen of mice (four in each group). 30 days later, the livers and spleens were excised after the mice were killed, and the numbers of liver metastases nodules were counted visually. All of the pathologic specimens were subsequently confirmed via histological analysis.
Human Growth Factor Array Q1 (RayBiotech, Norcross, GA, USA) was used for detection. SW480 cells were resuspended and plated in 100-mm dishes and incubated at 37°C for 72 h. Conditioned proteins were collected and incubated with antibody microarrays according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were obtained with a chemoluminescent imaging system and densitometry analysis was detected using ImageJ software.
Total protein of CRC cell lines was extracted by RIPA lysis buffer (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and the concentration was measured using BCA Protein assay kit (Beyotime, China). Equal amounts of total protein (30 μg) were separated by 12% SDS–PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes. After blocking with 5% BSA in TBST buffer for 2 h, the membranes were incubated with IGF1 antibody (1:1000 dilution; 133542; abcam, Cambridge, UK), or β-actin (1:5000 dilution; 66009-1-lg; Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA) overnight at 4°C. Afterwards, the membranes were incubated with a corresponding HRP-labelled secondary antibody (1:5000, Lablead, Beijing, China) for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, the blots were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescent kit (Beyotime, China). Quantification of the individual protein bands was performed by densitometry using ImageJ software.
We used bioinformatics algorithms Circular RNA Interactome (https://circinteractome.nia.nih.gov/index.html) to predict the target miRNAs of circRUNX1. The target proteins of miRNAs were predicted using Target Scan (http://www.targetscan.org). We chose 7mer-M8, 7mer-A1 or 8mer site type for further analysis.
The full-length circRUNX1 or the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of IGF1 sequences containing mutant or wild-type miR-145-5p binding sites were synthesized and cloned into psiCHECK-2 plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The mutated or wild-type plasmids were cotransfected with miR-145-5p mimics or mimics NC into HEK293 cells using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Invitrogen). 48 hours after transfection, the luciferase activity was measured with a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). Independent experiments were conducted in triplicate.
All the analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). GraphPad Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used to produce all the figures. Differences between groups were analyzed using chi-square test, Student’s t test, Wilcoxon signed rank test and one-way analysis of variance, as appropriate. Quantitative data were listed as mean ± SD. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In the preliminary experiments, we detected hundreds of potential circRNAs using high-throughput RNA sequencing in four paired CRC tissues.16 Finally, we found that circRUNX1 (hsa_circ_0002360) was significantly upregulated in the CRC tissues compared with paired normal mucosal tissues. According to circBase databases, circRUNX1 is derived from exons 2 and 3 of RUNX1, with a spliced mature sequence length of 297 base pairs (bp) (Figure 1A). To observe the subcellular distribution of circRUNX1 in CRC cells, RNA FISH was performed using SW480 cells, indicating that circRUNX1 was mostly located in the cytoplasm (Figure 1B). In order to confirm the upregulated expression of circRUNX1 in large samples of CRC patients, we detected another 52 paired CRC tissues by qRT-PCR (Figure 2A and B). Results showed that the expression of circRUNX1 was significantly up-regulated in CRC tissues compared to matched normal tissues (p < 0.001). We divided the 52 CRC patients into low- and high-expression groups using the median expression level of circRUNX1 as a cutoff value (Figure 2C). Statistical analyses indicated that the level of circRUNX1 was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.01), distant metastasis (p = 0.05) and TNM tumor stage (p = 0.01) (Table 1). In summary, these results suggest that circRUNX1 upregulation is common in CRC and its regulation is associated with later clinical stage (Figure 2D).
In order to explore the biological significance of circRUNX1 in CRC progression, gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments were performed. Based on the different expression of circRUNX1 in several CRC cell lines (Figure 3A), we decided to silence circRUNX1 expression in SW480 and HCT116 cells. si-circRUNX1#1 and si-circRUNX1#2 targeting the back-splice region of circRUNX1 were designed (Figure 3B) and qRT-PCR showed that si-circRUNX1#1 significantly decreased circRUNX1 level similarly to si-circRUNX1#2. For the higher efficiency of interference, si-circRUNX1#1 was chosen for subsequent experiments. CCK-8 and colony formation assays indicated that downregulation of circRUNX1 significantly inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation (Figure 3C and D). Flow cytometry was performed to evaluate the effect of circRUNX1 on cell cycle or apoptosis progression. Silence of circRUNX1 inhibited cell cycle progression in SW480 and HCT116 cells compared with the NC group (Figure 3E). Furthermore, circRUNX1 siRNA promoted apoptosis (Figure 3F). Transwell assays, including migration and invasion, were performed to determine repression of cell migration and invasion by downregulating circRUNX1 (Figure 3G). We developed SW480 or HCT116 cells with circRUNX1 stably overexpressed using pHBLV-CMV-MCS-EF1-puro lentiviral vectors (Figure 4A). Overexpression of circRUNX1 showed an opposite role in cell proliferation, cell apoptosis, cell cycle, and cell migration (Figure 4B–F).
A nude mice xenograft model was used to identify the effect of circRUNX1 on tumor growth in vivo. HCT116 cells with mock vector or circRUNX1 were subcutaneously injected into each mice. After 15 days of HCT116 cell injection, the tumor volumes were analyzed. We found that tumor volumes were significantly larger in the circRUNX1 than those in the NC groups (Figure 5A–C). Moreover, the effect of circRUNX1 overexpression upon tumor metastasis in vivo was also investigated. A intrasplenic injection model of HCT116 cells treated with mock vector or circRUNX1 was developed, then the animals were killed after 30 days of tumor cell injection when they were thin, arch-backed and acting dilatorily. HCT116 cells with circRUNX1 overexpression had more liver metastasis (4/4) than the NC groups (2/4) (Figure 5E). All samples containing subcutaneous tumor tissues and liver metastasis tissues were confirmed by HE staining (Figure 5D and F). On this basis, we identified circRUNX1 as a promoting factor of CRC progression in vivo.
In order to identify the factors by which circRUNX1 promoted proliferation of CRC cell lines, an antibody-based cytokine array that could detect 40 different growth factors and cytokines was performed to analyze the differences between circRUNX1 overexpression and control groups of SW480 cells. As demonstrated in Table 2, eight typical growth factors and cytokines, including bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) −5, IGF1, BMP-4, nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR), SCFR, growth hormone (GH), IGF binding protein (IGFBP) 6 and OPG, were significantly upregulated in circRUNX1 overexpression groups, ≥1.5-fold versus control groups (Figure 6A). In another pair of experiments, we detected five decreased growth factors and cytokines between si-circRUNX1#1 and si-NC groups of SW480 cells; that is, IGF1, Insulin, OPG, transforming growth factor (TGF) α and EG-VEGF (Table 3, Figure 6B). The subsequent Venn analysis implied that IGF1 and OPG might be the target proteins of circRUNX1, which is involved in the proliferation of CRC (Figure 6C). Between the two molecules, IGF1 produced the more significant change and was confirmed to play an important role in CRC proliferation (Figure 6D). To validate our results that circRUNX1 regulated expression of IGF1, we detected IGF1 expression in HCT116 cells by Western blotting (Figure 6E). On this basis, we showed that there may be positive relationship between the expression level of circRUNX1 and IGF1.
|Growth Factors and Cytokines||AveExp. circRUNX1 Overexpression Group||AveExp. Control Group||Log2FC||Fold Change|
circRNAs act as an miRNA sponge to regulate gene expression. Bioinformatics algorithms Circular RNA Interactome was used to predict the potential target miRNAs of circRUNX1. Among these diverse miRNAs, miR-145-5p was reported to be the potential target of IGF1, with a site type of 7mer-M8 based on Target Scan.17 To identify the interaction of circRUNX1 and miR-145-5p, and miR-145-5p and IGF1, luciferase reporter plasmids with mutant or wild-type circRUNX1 or IGF1 sequences were cotransfected with miR-145-5p mimics or mimics NC. Overexpression of miR-145-5p mimics markedly reduced luciferase activity to approximately 50% when compared with the NC (Figure 7A). FISH analysis showed that circRUNX1 and miR-145-5p colocalized in the cytoplasm (Figure 7B).
To further confirm that circRUNX1 can serve as a ceRNA to regulate IGF1 expression, we transfected SW480 and HCT116 cells with miR-145-5p mimics after overexpression of circRUNX1. miR-145-5p mimics markedly decreased IGF1, but it was rescued by circRUNX1 overexpression (Figure 7C). Cell proliferation assay was used to investigate the effect of miR-145-5p in CRC cells. Overexpression of miR-145-5p inhibited cell proliferation and overexpression of circRUNX1 rescued miR-145-5p-mimic-mediated suppression of cell proliferation (Figure 7D). These studies showed that circRUNX1 serves as a sponge for miR-145-5p to regulate IGF1 and promotes cell proliferation via the ceRNA mechanism in CRC cells (Figure 8).
Recently, the regulatory potential of circRNAs in cancers has attracted great attention, especially using whole transcriptome approaches.18,19 In our preliminary experiment, we detected hundreds of potential circRNAs using high-throughput RNA sequencing in four paired CRC tissues. However, most of the circRNAs showed no clinicopathological significance when enlarging the patient sample. In our experiments, we identified circRUNX1 as a significantly upregulated circRNA and correlated with tumor progression in 52 CRC patients. Gain-of-function and loss-of-function studies demonstrated that circRUNX1 was related with cell proliferation, cell apoptosis, cell cycle, and cell migration. Consistent with the above results, overexpression of circRUNX1 enhanced the proliferation and invasion of HCT116 cells in nude mouse models. All these findings support the oncogenic role of circRUNX1 in CRC tumorigenesis.
To better understand the functional mechanism of circRUNX1, human growth factor array was performed to identify the potential signaling pathways. Antibody-based cytokine arrays represent one of the high-throughput techniques which can detect multiple proteins simultaneously.20 According to human growth factor array analysis, we found circRUNX1 modulates a number of growth factors known to promote CRC cell proliferation. Overexpression of circRUNX1 released high levels of BMP-5, IGF1, BMP-4, NGFR, SCFR, GH, IGFBP6 and OPG, while knockdown of circRUNX1 reduced expression of IGF1, insulin, OPG, TGFα and EG-VEGF. We observed significant changes in IGF1 expression between the experimental and control groups. It is hypothesized that IGF1 is a key downstream target of circRUNX1 in the promotion of CRC cell proliferation.
IGF1 is highly expressed in various cancers, such as pancreatic cancer,21 colorectal cancer,22 gastric cancer,12 breast cancer,23 and acute myeloid leukemia.24 Previous studies have shown that IGF1 promotes tumor cell proliferation by initiating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, which has a great influence on cell cycle, cell migration and angiogenesis in several cancer types including CRC.25,26 In gastric cancer, the IGF1/IGF1R pathway is involved in the upregulation of STAT3 expression.12 At the cellular level, action of IGF1 is strictly regulated by IGFBP3, for the affinity of IGF1 to IGFBP3 is higher than that to IGF receptors. Consequently, the protein level of IBGBP3 directly controls the bioavailability of IGF1 to the IGF receptors and thereby indirectly modulates cell proliferation.24,27 In addition, IGF1 secretion is regulated by GH levels in CRC.28 However, according to our human growth factor array data, no significant changes in protein levels were detected in IGFBP3 or GH between the experimental and control groups. Based on these findings, we strongly hypothesize that in CRC cells, circRUNX1 is involved in IGF1-induced proliferation through a new signaling pathway.
The ceRNA hypothesis has proposed that RNA transcripts may construct a complex post-transcriptional regulatory network, in which mRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs share the same miRNA response elements, competing for binding miRNAs, and then regulating expression of each other.29–32 For instance, circTP63 contains miR-873-3p-binding sites and regulates FOXM1 expression via miR-873-3p in lung squamous cell carcinoma.19 In CRC, miR-597-5p was verified as the binding target of circ101555 and promotes tumor growth by regulating CSNK1G1.33 To better explore the molecular mechanism of circRUNX1, we used bioinformatics algorithms to predict the miRNA-binding sites. Among these candidates, miR-145-5p was selected as the downstream target of circRUNX1. Reliable evidence showed that miR-145-5p shares the same binding sites with IGF1.17
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a new class of short non-coding RNAs in tumor biology that can negatively regulate the expression of many target genes by interacting with the 3′ UTR.34 miR-145-5p was downregulated in CRC and positively associated with poorer overall survival, according to TCGA database.35,36 Our study showed that miR-145-5p reduced the luciferase activity of circRUNX1 luciferase reporter by almost 50%. FISH assay confirmed the colocalization of circRUNX1 and miR-145-5p. Importantly, our Western blotting analysis strongly indicated that circRUNX1 was the upstream molecule of miR-145-5p, and regulated IGF1 as a ceRNA of miR-145-5p. Cell phenotypes also confirmed overexpression of circRUNX1 could rescue miR-145-5p mimic-mediated suppression for proliferation, implying that miR-145-5p is an essential regulator in this model.
In summary, our work is the first to reveal that circRUNX1 is upregulated in CRC and acts as a tumor promotor that modulates cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle, and migration. Mechanistically, circRUNX1 competitively binds miR-145-5p to abolish the suppressive effect of miR-145-5p on IGF1. These findings provide an insight into understanding the CRC pathogenesis, and a potential target for CRC treatment.
circRNAs, circular RNAs; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; CRC, colorectal cancer; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; ncRNAs, non-coding RNAs; RNA-seq, RNA sequencing; ceRNA, competing endogenous RNA; siRNAs, small interfering RNAs; CDS, coding sequence; bp, base pairs; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University and conducted in accordance with the ethical standards formulated in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All animal studies were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Capital Medical University, and were performed in compliance with the Animal Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China-2009 for experimental animals. We mentioned this information in the manuscript.