PLoS ONE
Public Library of Science
image
Concept of an artificial muscle design on polypyrrole nanofiber scaffolds
Volume: 15, Issue: 5
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0232851
  • PDF   
  • XML   
  •       
Abstract

Here we present the synthesis and characterization of two new conducting materials having a high electro-chemo-mechanical activity for possible applications as artificial muscles or soft smart actuators in biomimetic structures. Glucose-gelatin nanofiber scaffolds (CFS) were coated with polypyrrole (PPy) first by chemical polymerization followed by electrochemical polymerization doped with dodecylbenzensulfonate (DBS-) forming CFS-PPy/DBS films, or with trifluoromethanesulfonate (CF3SO3-, TF) giving CFS-PPy/TF films. The composition, electronic and ionic conductivity of the materials were determined using different techniques. The electro-chemo-mechanical characterization of the films was carried out by cyclic voltammetry and square wave potential steps in bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide lithium solutions of propylene carbonate (LiTFSI-PC). Linear actuation of the CFS-PPy/DBS material exhibited 20% of strain variation with a stress of 0.14 MPa, rather similar to skeletal muscles. After 1000 cycles, the creeping effect was as low as 0,2% having a good long-term stability showing a strain variation per cycle of -1.8% (after 1000 cycles). Those material properties are excellent for future technological applications as artificial muscles, batteries, smart membranes, and so on.

Harjo, Järvekülg, Tamm, Otero, Kiefer, and Fernandes: Concept of an artificial muscle design on polypyrrole nanofiber scaffolds

1. Introduction

The development of reliable soft robotics and smart devices mimicking the multifunctionality of natural organs of living creatures requires new actuators in biomimetic structures and artificial muscles, working at low potentials with low energy consumption while exhibiting high strain variation per potential cycle and high long-term stability. Conducting polymers actuators [1] that work at low voltage, undergo large bending displacements [2] and linear strains as high as 26% [3]; 20% of strain variation was reported in case of PPy-Platinum/Iridium coil structures [4]. Inspired by similar coil designs, researchers try to increase linear strain by using carbon nanotubes and other natural or artificial electrospun materials [5] in their plain form or with a conducting polymer coating (CP). In addition, the electrochemical reaction of the CP driving the actuator senses, simultaneously, the physical and chemical conditions [6] allowing the development of sensing [7] and tactile [8] actuators suitable for mimicking the multifunctionality of haptic natural muscles and developing artificial proprioceptive systems [9,10]. At present, the main technological problem is the described poor long-term stability, the high strain variations are only achieved in the initial potential cycles.

The actuation mechanism has been intensely studied in the past [1115] with no unified model established. The main idea behind any model or development is making an “artificial muscle” in biomimetic structures comparable to skeletal muscles [1] showing ~ 20% of strain variation during an actuation cycle developing a stress higher than 0.1 MPa (0.3 MPa from cardiac muscles). Natural muscles have fiber bundle structures constituted by chemical molecular machines, i.e. actin-myosin-ATP, that develop that strain and stress variation at high rates during milli seconds, comparable performance has not been achieved by conducting polymer-based actuators.

Fiber-actuators based on polyaniline have reached strains in range of 1.2% [16]. 3% strain has been reported for actuators based on interpenetrated networks of hollow fibers- of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) [17]. Use of solid polymer electrolytes (SPE) [18] in linear fiber-actuators as well as encapsulated design [19] have led to linear strain of 0.5% [20] with drawbacks in actuator performance [21]. Different fiber-actuator designs of knitted and twisted yarns have been applied [22] to increase linear strain up to 3%. Using a single Lyocell PPy fiber a diametrical strain up to 6% was achieved [23]. Previous research [24] has also described a solution based on different elastic stretchable silicon yarns coated with electropolymerized PPy that reached 0.1% strain. Nanofiber scaffolds produced by electrospinning have fiber bundle structures that can be applied as is, or coated with PPy, in tissue engineering for skeleton muscle repair [25] due to its biocompatibility with cells [26,27]. Thus, besides the right conducting polymer, the substrate material has a great influence on the attained electrochemical actuation.

Following those ideas for increasing the mechanical performance of linear actuators our goal here was to use conductive nanofiber scaffold material coated with electropolymerized PPy for designing biomimetic active materials, which could be comparable to natural skeletal muscles in terms of structure, achievable strain and stress, and importantly—with long life time. The conductive nanofiber scaffold (CFS) consist of chemical coated used in previous works [28,29] as the substrate for electrodes to develop new materials by electropolymerization. This material can be stretched up to 17% without a major loss of conductivity.

1.1 Driving electrochemical reactions

Two different materials were obtained by using the conductive fiber scaffold (CFS) to electrodeposit a new PPy coat from solutions containing two different electrolytes: CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF. Linear strain and force measurements were performed by cyclic voltammetry in LiTFSI propylene carbonate (PC) solutions. The material actuation (reversible volume change by swelling/shrinking) is driven by reversible electrochemical oxidation/reduction reactions of the PPy material exchanging anions and solvent with the electrolyte for charge and osmotic balance [3032] following Eq 1: forwards, oxidation-swelling reaction; backwards, reduction-shrinking reaction:

[(PPy)(DBS)m(Li+)m(PC)o]+nTFSI+pPC[(PPy)n+(DBS)m(Li+)m(PC)(o+p)(TFSI)n+n(e)metal

The un-dissociated Li+DBS- ions pairs were incorporated during the electropolymerization process remaining now trapped in PC solutions, as was proved by XPS. The PPy/TF material also follows an anion driven actuation [33] without trapping ions seen in Eq 2:

(PPy0)+n(TFSI)sol+m(PC)[(PPyn+)(TFSI)n(PC)m]+n(e)

The left side shows the reduced PPy material and the right side the oxidized PPy material where the solvated anions TFSI- incorporate in the positively charged PPy and are remove as the PPy is reduced. As a typical anion driven actuator, the simplest material model of the intracellular matrix (ICM) of the muscular cells [34].

2. Material and methods

2.1 Materials

Propylene carbonate (PC, 99%), ethanol (technical grade), sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (NaDBS, technical grade), ammonium persulfate (APS, technical grade) and tetrabutylammonium triflouromethanesulfonate (TBACF3SO3, 99%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and used as supplied. Solvent ethylene glycol (EG, 99.8%) was purchased from Fluka. Pyrrole (Py, 98%, Sigma-Aldrich) was vacuum-distilled prior use and stored at low temperature in the dark. Milli-Q+ water was used for making aqueous solutions. Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI, 99.95%) was purchased from Solvionic. Gelatin type A from porcine skin, D-(+)-glucose (99.5%) and glacial acetic acid (99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

2.2 Electropolymerization of PPy films on conductive fiber scaffolds (CFS)

Fiber scaffolds based on type A gelatin from porcine skin (Sigma-Aldrich) and glucose were prepared by electrospinning, as previously described [28]. The fiber scaffolds were coated with a conductive polypyrrole material (thickness 16 ± 1.1 μm) to achieve a 49 ± 3 μm thickness of the conductive fiber scaffold, with electronic conductivity of 0.35 ± 0.02 S cm-1. The attained CFS material was used as the working electrode for a subsequent galvanostatic electropolymerization (0.1 mA cm-2, 40,000s, -40°C) of polypyrrole from different polymerization solution. A two-electrode electrochemical cell was used. The working electrode—the CFS material (18 cm2)—was placed in between two counter-electrodes of stainless steel mesh (each 18 cm2), at ~ 1 cm distance from either.

The CFS-PPy/DBS samples were obtained using 0.1 M pyrrole and 0.1 M NaDBS ethylene glycol (EG) Milli-Q water (1:1) solutions. The samples, now coated with PPy-DBS, CFS-PPy/DBS, were washed with ethanol in order to remove any unpolymerized pyrrole and then with Milli-Q water in order to remove any excess of NaDBS. Then the samples were dried in the oven at 60°C (2 mbar) for 12h. The final thickness of the CFS-PPy/DBS samples was 125 ± 8 μm. The CFS-PPy/TF samples were prepared by galvanostatic polymerization in 0.1 M pyrrole, 0.1 M TBACF3SO3 (TF) propylene carbonate solutions during a polymerization time of 40,000s. The coated CFS-PPy/TF samples were washed with propylene carbonate first in order to remove any excess of TBACF3SO3, then with ethanol to remove any excess of pyrrole monomer and then dried in the oven at 60°C (2 mbar) for 12h. The final thickness of the dry CFS-PPy/TF samples was 136 ± 9 μm. For comparison, PPy/DBS and PPy/TF films were polymerized on stainless steel sheets using the same experimental condition and then removed from the metal to be used as free standing film electrodes. The thickness of the free-standing films was: 24 ± 2 μm for PPy/DBS and 20 ± 1 μm for PPy/TF.

2.3 Linear actuation

The CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF samples and PPy/DBS and PPy/TF free standing films were cut into longitudinal strips: 1.0 cm length and 0.1 cm width each. In a three electrode set up: platinum counter electrode, Ag/AgCl (3M KCl) reference electrode, the samples were fixed as the working electrodes on gold contact/electrode of a force sensor (TRI202PAD, Panlab) of the linear muscle analyzer setup [35]. The samples were pre-stretched by 2%, holding this position for 2h. Then the electro-chemo-mechanical experiments were carried out in 0.2 M LiTFSI in propylene carbonate (LiTFSI-PC) solutions by following: the sample length change under a constant force of 4.9 mN, or the force change for a constant length of 1 mm while submitting the sample to cyclic voltammetry (CV) at 5 mVs-1, between 1.0 V and -0.55 V. The PPy/DBS and PPy/TF free standing films were submitted to the same electro-chemo-mechanical experiments. In order to explore the frequency-response and the useful life-time, the CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF samples were submitted to consecutive square wave potential steps between the same potential limits in the frequency range between 0.0025 Hz and 0.1 Hz. Long term measurements (1000 cycles) were performed at 0.1 Hz. Three different samples for each synthesized material were measured. The presented values represent means, reported together with standard deviations.

The diffusion coefficients of the exchanged counter ions were calculated following the Eqs 3 and 4 [36].

ln[1QQt]=bt
D=bh22

From the current density/time experimental responses at each applied frequency, the charge density Q at each oxidation or reduction time point t, was determined by integration of the response, with Qt the charge density at the end of each reaction. By plotting (Eq 4) ln [1-Q/Qt ] versus the reaction time t, the slope, b, can be obtained. The diffusion coefficient D was determined from Eq 5 by including the thickness, h, of the sample.

2.4 Characterization of CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF

The CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (Helios NanoLab 600, FEI) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) (Oxford Instruments with X-Max 50 mm2 detector). Before characterization, 5 min polarization at -0.55 V and +1.0 V was performed for the reduced and oxidized films, respectively. FTIR spectroscopy (Bruker Alpha with Platinum ATR) was applied to characterize CFS, CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF samples in range of 2000 to 800 cm-1 . To evaluate the surface conductivity of the coatings, an in-house 4-point probe was used. The conductivity was calculated using the Eq 5:

σe=1(R*w)
where σe is the electric conductivity, R is the surface resistivity (Ω/sq) and w is the material thickness.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Electropolymerization and morphology

The electropolymerization curves (chronopotentiometric responses during the electropolymerization process) and the SEM images of the attained free standing PPy/DBS and PPy/TF films are presented in S1 Fig. The electropolymerization responses during the synthesis of the CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF films, as well as the SEM images of the attained materials are shown in Fig 1A–1C.

a: Chronopotentiometric response during the galvanostatic electropolymerization of the CFS-PPy/DBS (black line) and CFS-PPy/TF (red line) scaffold materials. The SEM surface images (scale bar 5 μm); each inset shows the cross section of a single fiber (scale bar 1 μm): b, CFS-PPy/DBS, and c, CFS-PPy/TF.
Fig 1
a: Chronopotentiometric response during the galvanostatic electropolymerization of the CFS-PPy/DBS (black line) and CFS-PPy/TF (red line) scaffold materials. The SEM surface images (scale bar 5 μm); each inset shows the cross section of a single fiber (scale bar 1 μm): b, CFS-PPy/DBS, and c, CFS-PPy/TF.

Fig 1A shows that the CFS-PPy/DBS samples grew during 11.1h under a constant electropolymerization potential of 2.55 V, while the electropolymerization of the CFS-PPy/TF sample was a more resistive process, going through a potential maximum of 3.45 V after 0.5h and then decreasing gradually to 3.22 V by the end of the polymerization time. These observations can be attributed to the different electronic conductivity of the samples immersed in different electrolytes; 0.42 ± 0.2 S cm-1 in aqueous-ethylene glycol solution, and 0.11 ± 0.1 S cm-1 in PC solution similar to those found in a previous work [29]. The reference electropolymerization of PPy/DBS and PPy/TF films on stainless steel sheets (S1 Fig) required lower voltages: 1.17 V for PPy/TF and 0.9 V for PPy/DBS, due to the higher conductivity of the underlayer, but also pointing to less overoxidation-degradation processes during the material generation. Fig 1B shows that the CFS-PPy/DBS sample presents a quite uniform coating film of electrodeposited PPy/DBS material. The diameter of the cross section of the fiber is 2.2 ± 0.2 μm. The diameter of the original chemically coated nanofiber scaffold was 1.4 ± 0.1 μm [28], accordingly, the PPy/DBS electrodeposition added 0.8 ± 0.04 μm (inset of Fig 1B). The CFS-PPy/TF sample (inset of Fig 1C) shows a diameter in range of 2.5 μm. The SEM images of PPy/DBS and PPy/TF free standing films, S1B and S1C Fig, revealed the typical PPy morphology seen before [37,38], with a dense cross section (inset of S1B and S1C Fig). Table 1 present both, conductivities and thicknesses of the dry samples, as well as those of the free standing PPy/DBS and PPy/TF films.

Table 1
Electronic conductivities and thicknesses of CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF samples as well PPy/DBS and PPy/TF free standing films (after polymerization).
SamplesConductivity [S cm-1]Thickness [μm]
CFS-PPy/DBS2.4 ± 0.2125 ± 8
PPy/DBS15.4 ± 0.524 ± 1.1
CFS-PPy/TF10.0 ± 0.7136 ± 9
PPy/TF11.4 ± 0.820 ± 0.1

The free standing films present the highest conductivities, as expected for solid films, 15.4 S cm-1 for PPy/DBS and 11.4 S cm-1for PPy/TF quite close to the CFS-PPy/TF sample, 10 S cm-1; the CFS-PPy/DBS sample was the most resistive, at 2.4 S cm-1 . The results can be related to the influence of the PC solvent on the electropolymerization process [39], but also on the different real (active material) density of the materials.

3.1.1 FTIR and EDX spectroscopy

Fig 2A shows the FTIR spectra obtained from the original CFS material and from the CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF samples. Fig 2B and 2C show the EDX spectroscopic results (using cross section of the CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF) from both, the oxidized and the reduced samples in order to try to identify the different ion content of the two states.

a: FTIR spectra of CFS-PPy/DBS (black line), CFS-PPy/TF (red line) and CFS samples (blue line) in wavelength range of 2000 to 800 cm-1. EDX spectra of oxidized (5min, 1V, black line) and reduced (5 min at -0.55 V, red line) in b: CFS-PPy/DBS and c: CFS-PPy/TF.
Fig 2
a: FTIR spectra of CFS-PPy/DBS (black line), CFS-PPy/TF (red line) and CFS samples (blue line) in wavelength range of 2000 to 800 cm-1. EDX spectra of oxidized (5min, 1V, black line) and reduced (5 min at -0.55 V, red line) in b: CFS-PPy/DBS and c: CFS-PPy/TF.

The CFS material (Fig 2A) contained some PPy from the original chemical polymerization (using APS oxidant) on the glucose-gelatin nanofiber scaffold. The sharp peak at 1778 cm-1 seen in CFS sample is from the carboxyl group (C = O) formed by PPy overoxidation [40]. Typical signals for glucose-gelatin are shown at 1640 and 1533 cm-1 [41] as the amide I and amide II peaks, respectively. The peak at 1640 cm-1 can be clearly identified in CFS, CFS-PPy/TF and CFS-PPy/DBS. The peak at 1533 cm-1 for CFS-PPy/DBS is overlapped by the 1542 cm-1 peak, which represents the polypyrrole ring stretching vibration (C = C) [42]. Other typical PPy peaks can be found at 1452 cm-1 (C-C stretching vibrations) and 1280 cm-1 (C-N stretching mode) [43] and the band at 1160 cm-1–1200 cm-1, which was identified in CFS-PPy/DBS at 1168 cm-1 as the breathing vibration of the PPy ring [44]. The 1183 cm-1 peak found for CFS and CFS-PPy/TF describe the same breathing vibrations of PPy rings [44]. The polaron band is found in CFS and CFS-PPy/DBS at 1040 cm-1 (in literature 1045 cm-1 [45]). In CFS-PPy/TF a new peak at 1023 cm-1 was associated with the triflate anion [46]. It can be concluded that PPy/DBS and PPy/TF were indeed deposited on CFS material.

Fig 2B and 2C show the EDX spectroscopic results from CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF samples, respectively, in the oxidized (at 1.0 V) and the reduced (at—0.55 V) states. The peaks correspond to the different atoms present in the samples: carbon (C) at 0.27 keV, nitrogen (N) at 0.38 keV, oxygen (O) at 0.52 keV, fluorine at 0.68 keV and sulfur (S) at 2.32 keV. The oxidized CFS-PPy/DBS material presented an increase of fluorine, oxygen and sulfur content compared to those of the reduced material indicating the incorporation of TFSI- anions during the oxidation reaction. A small amount TFSI- remained trapped in the reduced state of the CFS-PPy/DBS material, as observed before [38] using free standing PPy/DBS films. The high amount of sulfur after reduction refers to: entrapped TFSI- anions, the immobile DBS- anions in PPy and some SO42- anions from the initial chemical polymerization of PPy on CFS [47]. The peaks of oxygen, fluorine and sulfur increased after the oxidation of the CFS-PPy/TF samples, indicating again the entrance of balancing TFSI- anions from the solution during the oxidation of the material. After reduction, some fluorine, related to the residual immobilized spherical triflate anions [48] (CF3SO3- ) from the PPy electropolymerization were present, as also seen previously [37]. As a partial conclusion, the EDX results indicate that the CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF samples follow anion-active TFSI- exchange for charge balance during the reversible redox cycles.

3.2 Linear actuation

The bundle-like fibers coated individually with PPy (as seen in Fig 1B and 1C) are envisaged to bring closer the concept of an “artificial muscle”. To mimic the natural contraction/elongation of muscle tissue, linear actuation of the CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF samples was carried out to ensure that those materials could be suitable for the envisaged soft robots and smart multifunctional applications. The aforementioned suitability was further investigated by long-term measurements, at 0.1 Hz frequency to prove the durability of the material and consistency of the response.

3.2.1 Reversible electro-chemo-mechanical changes under cyclic voltammetry

Cyclic voltammetry results describe the response of the materials to closer-to-equilibrium conditions, as the driving signal is a (relatively slow) sweep rather than the abrupt polarity change of square wave potential steps. Fig 3 presents the CV (scan rate 5 mV s-1 ) driven results, with the electro-chemo-mechanical response of strain and stress in 3a and 3b, respectively. The voltammetric responses (current density vs. potential) are shown in Fig 3C. Fig 3D presents the charge density (mC cm-3 ) calculated by the integration of the cyclic voltammograms, taking into account the sweep rate. Fig 3A reveals that the samples swell/shrink by oxidation/reduction, respectively, indicating anion-driven actuation (Eq 1 for PPy/DBS and Eq 2 for PPy/TF materials). Upon oxidation, the anions ingress into the material from the solution in order to balance the positive charges generated by electron loss on the polymer chains. The material swelling results, under constant force, in the increase of strain, up to 18% for CFS-PPy/DBS and 8.2% for CFS-PPy/TF films. Upon reduction, the material recovers the original position of the beginning of the potential cycle. To our knowledge, the results presented here represent the highest strain variation reported for any nanofiber scaffold materials.

Cyclic voltammetry (scan rate 5 mV s-1) of CFS-PPy/DBS (black line) and CFS-PPy/TF (red line) in LiTFSI-PC (potential range 1 V to -0.55 V against Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) reference electrode, 4th cycle) showing in a: strain ε; b: stress σ, c: current density j and d: charge density Q against potential E. The arrows indicate the direction of scan.
Fig 3
Cyclic voltammetry (scan rate 5 mV s-1) of CFS-PPy/DBS (black line) and CFS-PPy/TF (red line) in LiTFSI-PC (potential range 1 V to -0.55 V against Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) reference electrode, 4th cycle) showing in a: strain ε; b: stress σ, c: current density j and d: charge density Q against potential E. The arrows indicate the direction of scan.

The stress variations at constant length, Fig 3B, reveal a similar response for both the studied materials: 0.14 MPa for CFS-PPy/DBS and 0.12 MPa for CFS-PPy/TF, both in the range of the skeletal muscles (0.1 MPa). The reference actuator responses from free-standing films, S2A Fig, show a reversible strain variation in range of 20% for the PPy/DBS, and 8.6% for the PPy/TF films. The stress evolves, S2B Fig, in range of 0.24 MPa for PPy/DBS and 1.38 MPa for PPy/TF free standing films. The presence of a stress maximum and two crossing loops suggest the existence of some mixed ion actuation (entrance of some cations at the most cathodic potentials). Such excellent strain performance could be attributed to the underlying CFS material, as indicated in previous works [28]. Typically, conducting polymers have been deposited on inert metals such as (sputtered) gold or platinum, which can develop failures by cracking if stretched [49], reducing the conductivity up to 25 times after 20% stretching, becoming non-conductors after 30% stretching. Recently [29] it was observed that the conductivity of the CFS in aqueous solution under modified EIS measurements dropped by 50% after 16,7% stretching.

The closed charge density loops in Fig 3D indicate full reversibility of the oxidation/reduction reactions inside the studied potential range: the presence of irreversible parallel oxidation or reduction reactions, i.e., solvent electrolysis, should give open Q/E loops. This confirms that the anodic/cathodic charges are used to oxidize/reduce the conducting polymer (“steady state”). The reversible redox cycles are expected to result in faradaic actuators [50]: linear variation of the strain with the reaction charge density. For comparison, the cyclic voltammetric results attained from free standing PPy/DBS and PPy/TF films are shown in S2C Fig and those for CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF samples in Fig 3C. The maximum redox charge (Fig 3D and S2D Fig) gives the involved charge densities as: 30.4 C cm-3 for CFS-PPy/DBS, 42 C cm-3 for CFS-PPy/TF, 90.4 C cm-1 for PPy/DBS and 78.5 C cm-1 for PPy/TF. The higher densities for free-standing films are logically explained by their much higher content of active material.

The Young’s modulus of conducting polymers also typically changes during reversible redox cycles, altering the response, as it becomes lower in the reduced than in the oxidized state [51]. Continues cycling/actuation also tends to cause changes. Table 2 shows the Young’s modulus attained for our oxidized materials before and after actuation cycles.

Table 2
Young’s Modulus of linear actuator samples in LiTFSI-PC before and after actuation cycles.
SamplesYoung’s Modulus [kPa]Young’s Modulus [kPa]
Before actuation (oxidized state)After actuation (oxidized state)
PPy/DBS980 ± 60.3700.2 ± 50.4
PPy/TF260 ± 16.5222.4 ± 12.3
CFS-PPy/DBS123.8 ± 9.822.7 ± 1.2
CFS-PPy/TF55.5 ± 4.743.2 ± 3.3

The high value of the modulus of the PPy/DBS and PPy/TF free standing films is attributed to the significantly denser and compact structure. In addition to the obviously more fibrous structure of the CFS, the conducting polymer deposited on the CFS samples is also less compact, as the synthesis potential was higher. Whichever the studied sample, the modulus decreases after cycling in LiTFSI-PC (Table 2). This drop can be related [52] to the exchange of solvent and ions, creating a dense PPy gel and the modulus decreases [53]. For CFS-PPy/DBS samples the modulus decreases up to 5 times after actuation, having a direct (positive) effect on strain, as previously found for PPy-CDC or PPy-PEO/DBS free standing films [54,55]. Otherwise, the PPy/DBS films operating in LiTFSI-PC (Eq 1) contained un-dissociated Li+DBS- ion couples [38] that tend to precipitate, accordingly, the exchanged counterions increase the amount of solvent in the film to maintain the osmotic balance [32] during the redox cycles, thus, decreasing the modulus.

3.2.2 Square wave potentials steps and actuator life-time

Three different samples of every studied material were submitted to consecutive square potential cycles involving a high oxidation/reduction charge density at different frequencies ranging between 0.0025 Hz and 0.1 Hz in order to follow the strain evolution during the actuator life-time (S1 Table). Fig 4A shows the applied potential cycles (dashed lines) and the corresponding strain response of the materials (CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF). The mean strain values with standard deviations as a function of both, the applied frequency and the redox charge are shown in Fig 4B and 4C, respectively.

Square wave potential measurements in potential range 1 V to -0.55 V in LiTFSI-PC electrolyte showing in a: the strain ε (2nd-3th cycles) of CFS-PPy/DBS (black line) and CFS-PPy/TF (red line) with potential E (dashed) against time t (frequency, 0.0025 Hz). At frequencies 0.0025 Hz to 0.1 Hz, the maximum strain of CFS-PPy/DBS (black, ■) and CFS-PPy/TF (red, ★) against logarithmic scale of frequency are shown in (b). The obtained charge densities Q from each chronopotentiogram shown in c: strain ε against the charge density Q. The dashed lines in c represent linear fits and are shown just as visual guides.
Fig 4
Square wave potential measurements in potential range 1 V to -0.55 V in LiTFSI-PC electrolyte showing in a: the strain ε (2nd-3th cycles) of CFS-PPy/DBS (black line) and CFS-PPy/TF (red line) with potential E (dashed) against time t (frequency, 0.0025 Hz). At frequencies 0.0025 Hz to 0.1 Hz, the maximum strain of CFS-PPy/DBS (black, ■) and CFS-PPy/TF (red, ) against logarithmic scale of frequency are shown in (b). The obtained charge densities Q from each chronopotentiogram shown in c: strain ε against the charge density Q. The dashed lines in c represent linear fits and are shown just as visual guides.

At the lowest frequency, 0.0025 Hz, corresponding to higher oxidation/reduction charge, 22% of strain variation was recorded (Fig 4A) for the CFS-PPy/DBS material. This high strain corroborates the above attained (18%) by cyclic voltammetry (Fig 3A). Creep (different material length at the beginning and at the end of the cycle) was noticeable after two consecutive cycles: 1.2% for the CFS-PPy/DBS samples and 2.5% for CFS-PPy/TF samples. Rising loads (MPa) and lower frequencies (longer time in oxidation/reduction) produce higher creeping effects [56]. Higher oxidation/reduction charges at lower frequencies with more ions exchanged per cycle increases the viscosity PPy[57] and more solvent exchange enhances the plasticization process [32], allowing increased creep. The presence of some parallel irreversible reactions can also increase the creeping effect [58].

Fig 4B and 4C present the strain evolution as a function of the applied frequency and of the redox charge density, respectively. As usual, the strain decreases with increasing frequency; however, at each frequency the strain shown by CFS-PPy/DBS was two times higher than for the CFS-PPy/TF. The charge densities were obtained at each applied frequency from the concomitant chronoamperometric (current/time) responses. The strain of every material increased linearly with the redox charge density (Fig 4C), as expected for any faradaic actuators [50], as the volume variation (exchange of ions and solvent) is controlled by the redox charge. Whichever the frequency, for the same redox charge density the strain variation of the CFS-PPy/DBS samples is over two times that of the CFS-PPy/TF samples. Clearly, the coupling between ion/solvent flux and polymer matrix is much stronger in the former, likely due to the structure generated by the original doping ions.

The interaction of ion flux with the polymer matrix upon redox cycling must reflect in the (apparent) diffusion coefficient of the counterions through the material. Thus, the diffusion coefficients during oxidation and reduction were calculated using Eqs 3 and 4, for CFS-PPy/TF and CFS-PPy/DBS samples with thickness of 136 μm and 125 μm, respectively.

Fig 5A shows the linear dependence of the diffusion coefficients during the oxidation reaction on the applied frequency. The diffusion coefficients upon reduction against the applied frequency are shown at S3 Fig. Fig 5B presents the linear relationships between the strain rate (% s-1) and the diffusion coefficients during the material oxidation.

CFS-PPy/DBS (■) and CFS-PPy/TF (★) showing in a: Diffusion coefficients Dox (upon oxidation) obtained from Eqs 2 and 3 against the applied frequency f and b: the strain rate νox against diffusion coefficients Dox.
Fig 5
The dashed lines represent the linear fit and shown for orientations.CFS-PPy/DBS (■) and CFS-PPy/TF () showing in a: Diffusion coefficients Dox (upon oxidation) obtained from Eqs 2 and 3 against the applied frequency f and b: the strain rate νox against diffusion coefficients Dox.

Both Figs agree to the electrochemically stimulated conformational-relaxation (ESCR) model [11]: at higher frequencies the average swelling/shrinking change driven by the conformational relaxation of the polymeric chains of the conducting polymer are slower giving a lower density gel structure, with concomitant higher diffusion coefficients. In parallel, higher strain rate νox of CFS-PPy/DBS was attained with rising experimental frequencies which correspond to, as stated in the previous sentence, higher diffusion coefficients: a linear relationship is attained between the strain rate and D.

The suitability of those two materials (CFS-PPy/DBS and CFS-PPy/TF) in biomimetic structure with such high strain for applications in soft robotics, artificial muscles and multifunctional devices requires long term stability of the actuation response. Fig 6 presents the results of the strain during 1000 actuating cycles at 0.1 Hz (S3 Table).

Stability test: Square wave potential steps at frequency 0.1 Hz (1000 cycles) in potential range 1 V to -0.55 V in LiTFSI-PC showing in a: the strain ε of CFS-PPy/DBS (black) and CFS-PPy/TF (red) against time t and in b: the strain ε (main values with standard deviation) of CFS-PPy/DBS (■) and CFS-PPy/TF (★) against cycle number.
Fig 6
Stability test: Square wave potential steps at frequency 0.1 Hz (1000 cycles) in potential range 1 V to -0.55 V in LiTFSI-PC showing in a: the strain ε of CFS-PPy/DBS (black) and CFS-PPy/TF (red) against time t and in b: the strain ε (main values with standard deviation) of CFS-PPy/DBS (■) and CFS-PPy/TF () against cycle number.

The creep after 1000 cycles was (Fig 6) 0.2% for CFS-PPy/DBS samples and 0.7% for CFS-PPy/TF samples. Of the studied materials, CFS-PPy/DBS is better suited for most applications when the strain response as well as the creep effect are considered. The strain variation per cycle decreases with the number of cycles (Fig 6B): 1.83% after 50 cycles and 1.75% after 1000 cycles for CFS-PPy/DBS and 1.09% after 50 cycles and 0.95% after 1000 cycles for CFS-PPy/TF. While the strain was higher for CFS-PPy/DBS, the loss of strain was lower for CFS-PPy/TF, indicating higher stability, which can be beneficial in technological applications.

Overall, the CFS-PPy/DBS material with a biomimetic structure presents great potential for technological applications in soft robotics applications due to its high strain of over 20%, low creeping effect (0,2% after 1000 cycles) and long term persistence of the strain variation achieved in a cycle (-1.8% after 1000 cycles). All of these compare favorably to natural skeletal muscles, although at a lower response rate. The actuation speed needs be optimized in future studies.

4. Conclusions

We have shown that the CFS materials coated with conducting polymers (PPy/DBS and PPy/TF) remained with a biomimetic bundle-like structure (as seen in the SEM images). The FTIR measurements identified successful combination of CFS with PPy/DBS and PPy/TF. It was shown that 20% linear strain and 0.1 MPa stress for CFS-PPy/DBS (CFS-PPy/TF reached 8% linear strain) was achievable, which is similar to the respective parameters of natural skeletal muscles. For both materials, a single ion species (the anion) dominates the actuation direction (expansion at oxidation). Of the two materials, CFS-PPy/DBS should be preferred based on the maximum strain and stress reached, but also for lower creep with useful response stability in square wave potential step measurements over 1000 cycles at 0.1 Hz. The behavior is well described using theoretical models, allowing consistent characterization and control of potential devices. The main drawback of the fibrous linear actuators compared to natural muscles is the significantly lower strain rates. Further research in optimizing is needed in order to reach applications in soft robotics and multifunctional smart materials truly mimicking natural muscles.

References

1 

RH Baughman. . Conducting polymer artificial muscles. Synth Met. 1996;78: , pp.339–353. , doi: 10.1016/0379-6779(96)80158-5

2 

D Melling, JG Martinez, EWH Jager. . Conjugated Polymer Actuators and Devices: Progress and Opportunities. Adv Mater. 2019;31: , pp.1808210.

3 

S Hara, T Zama, W Takashima, K Kaneto. . TFSI-doped polypyrrole actuator with 26% strain. J Mater Chem. 2004;14: , pp.1516, doi: 10.1039/b404232h

4 

S Hara, T Zama, N Tanaka, W Takashima, K Kaneto. . Artificial fibular muscles with 20% strain based on polypyrrole-metal coil composites. Chem Lett. 2005;34: , pp.784–785. , doi: 10.1246/cl.2005.784

5 

S Aziz, GM Spinks. . Torsional artificial muscles. Mater Horizons. 2020; accepted. , doi: 10.1039/c9mh01441a

6 

TF Otero, S Beaumont. . The Energy Consumed by Electrochemical Molecular Machines as Self-Sensor of the Reaction Conditions: Origin of Sensing Nervous Pulses and Asymmetry in Biological Functions. ChemElectroChem. 2018;5: , pp.3335–3347. , doi: 10.1002/celc.201800905

7 

TF Otero, MT Cortés. . A sensing muscle. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2003;96: , pp.152–156. , doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00518-5

8 

TF Otero, MT Cortés. . Artificial muscles with tactile sensitivity. Adv Mater. 2003;15: , pp.279–282. , doi: 10.1002/adma.200390066

9 

TF Otero, JG Martinez. . Physical and chemical awareness from sensing polymeric artificial muscles. Experiments and modeling. Prog Polym Sci. 2015;44: , pp.62–78. , doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.09.002

10 

TF Otero. . Conducting Polymers Bioinspired Intelligent Materials and Devices. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2016, doi: 10.1039/9781782623748-FP001

11 

TF Otero, I Boyano. . Comparative study of conducting polymers by the ESCR model. J Phys Chem B. 2003;107: , pp.6730–6738. , doi: 10.1021/jp027748j

12 

X Chen, O Inganäs. . Three-Step Redox in Polythiophenes: Evidence from Electrochemistry at an Ultramicroelectrode. J Phys Chem. 1996;100: , pp.15202–15206. , doi: 10.1021/jp9601779

13 

J Heinze, BA Frontana-Uribe, S Ludwigs. . Electrochemistry of Conducting Polymers—Persistent Models and New concepts. Chem Rev. 2010;110: , pp.4724–4771. , doi: 10.1021/cr900226k

14 

T Shoa, DS Yoo, K Walus, JDW Madden. . A dynamic electromechanical model for electrochemically driven conducting polymer actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics. 2011;16: , pp.42–49. , doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2010.2090166

15 

TF Otero. . Artificial muscles driven by the cooperative actuation of electrochemical molecular machines. Persistent discrepancies and challenges. Int J Smart Nano Mater. 2017;8: , pp.125–143. , doi: 10.1080/19475411.2018.1434256

16 

B Qi, W Lu, BR Mattes. . Strain and energy efficiency of polyaniline fiber electrochemical actuators in aqueous electrolytes. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108: , pp.6222–6227. , doi: 10.1021/jp031092s

17 

C Plesse, F Vidal, D Teyssie, C Chevrot. . Conducting IPN fibers: A new design for linear actuation in open air. CIMTEC 2008—Proc 3rd Int Conf Smart Mater Struct Syst—Artif Muscle Actuators using Electroact Polym. 2008;61: , pp.53–58. , doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.61.53

18 

A Fannir, R Temmer, GTM Nguyen, L Cadiergues, E Laurent, JDW Madden, et al. Linear Artificial Muscle Based on Ionic Electroactive Polymer: A Rational Design for Open-Air and Vacuum Actuation. Adv Mater Technol. 2019;4: , pp.1–8. , doi: 10.1002/admt.201800519

19 

P Jaakson, A Aabloo, T Tamm. . Encapsulation of ionic electroactive polymers: reducing the interaction with environment. Spie. 2016 p. , pp.979825, doi: 10.1117/12.2219053

20 

JD Madden, RA Cush, TS Kanigan, CJ Brenan, IW Hunter. . Encapsulated polypyrrole actuators. Synth Met. 1999;105: , pp.61–64.

21 

S Naficy, N Stoboi, PG Whitten, GM Spinks, GG Wallace. . Evaluation of encapsulating coatings on the performance of polypyrrole actuators. Smart Mater Struct. 2013;22, doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/22/7/075005

22 

A Maziz, A Concas, A Khaldi, J Stålhand, N-K Persson, EWH Jager. . Knitting and weaving artificial muscles. Sci Adv. 2017;3: , pp.1–12. , doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600327

23 

A Maziz, A Khaldi, N-K Persson, EWH Jager. . Soft linear electroactive polymer actuators based on polypyrrole. SPIE Smart Struct Mater, Nondestruct Eval Heal Monit. 2015;9430: , pp.943016, doi: 10.1117/12.2081821

24 

JG Martinez, K Richter, NK Persson, EWH Jager. . Investigation of electrically conducting yarns for use in textile actuators. Smart Mater Struct. 2018;27, doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/aabab5

25 

MT Wolf, CL Dearth, SB Sonnenberg, EG Loboa, SF Badylak. . Naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for skeletal muscle reconstruction. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;84: , pp.208–221. , doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.08.011

26 

A Fahlgren, C Bratengeier, A Gelmi, CM Semeins, J Klein-Nulend, EWH Jager, et al. Biocompatibility of polypyrrole with human primary osteoblasts and the effect of dopants. PLoS One. 2015;10: , pp.1–18. , doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134023

27 

V Lundin, A Herland, M Berggren, EWH Jager, AI Teixeira. . Control of neural stem cell survival by electroactive polymer substrates. PLoS One. 2011;6, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018624

28 

M Harjo, A Kesküla, K Leemets, MS Khorram, R Saar, M Järvekülg, et al. Polypyrrole coatings on gelatin fiber scaffolds: Material and electrochemical characterizations in organic and aqueous electrolyte. Synth Met. 2017;232: , pp.25–30. , doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2017.07.014

29 

M Harjo, Z Zondaka, K Leemets, M Järvekülg, T Tamm, R Kiefer. . Polypyrrole-coated fiber-scaffolds: Concurrent linear actuation and sensing. J Appl Polym Sci. 2020;48533: , pp.1–8. , doi: 10.1002/app.48533

30 

KP Vidanapathirana, MA Careem, S Skaarup, K West. . Ion movement in polypyrrole/dodecylbenzenesulphonate films in aqueous and non-aqueous electrolytes. Solid State Ionics. 2002;154: , pp.331–335. , doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00530-1

31 

R Kiefer, JG Martinez, A Kesküla, G Anbarjafari, A Aabloo, TF Otero. . Polymeric actuators: Solvents tune reaction-driven cation to reaction-driven anion actuation. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2016;233: , pp.328–336. , doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.04.090

32 

L Bay, T Jacobsen, S Skaarup, K West. . Mechanism of actuation in conducting polymers: Osmotic expansion. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105: , pp.8492–8497. , doi: 10.1021/jp003872w

33 

TF Otero. . Biomimetic Conducting Polymers: Synthesis, Materials, Properties, Functions, and Devices. Polym Rev. 2013;53: , pp.311–351. , doi: 10.1080/15583724.2013.805772

34 

TF Otero, JG Martinez. . Biomimetic intracellular matrix (ICM) materials, properties and functions. Full integration of actuators and sensors. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1: , pp.26–38. , doi: 10.1039/c2tb00176d

35 

M Harjo, T Tamm, G Anbarjafari, R Kiefer. . Hardware and Software Development for Isotonic Strain and Isometric Stress Measurements of Linear Ionic Actuators. Polymers (Basel). 2019;1054: , pp.1–14.

36 

TF Otero, JG Martinez. . Activation energy for polypyrrole oxidation: Film thickness influence. J Solid State Electrochem. 2011;15: , pp.1169–1178. , doi: 10.1007/s10008-010-1170-1

37 

N Aydemir, PA Kilmartin, J Travas-Sejdic, A Kesküla, A-L Peikolainen, J Parcell, et al. Electrolyte and solvent effects in PPy/DBS linear actuators. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2015;216: , pp.24–32. , doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.03.098

38 

A Kivilo, Z Zondaka, A Kesküla, P Rasti, T Tamm, R Kiefer. . Electro-chemo-mechanical deformation properties of polypyrrole/dodecylbenzenesulfate linear actuators in aqueous and organic electrolyte. RSC Adv. 2016;6: , pp.69–75. , doi: 10.1039/C6RA20766A

39 

J Ouyang, Y Li. . Effect of electrolyte solvent on the conductivity and structure ppy films. Polymer (Guildf). 1997;38: , pp.1971–1976.

40 

M Harjo, J Torop, M Järvekülg, T Tamm, R Kiefer. . Electrochemomechanical Behavior of Polypyrrole-Coated Nanofiber Scaffolds in Cell Culture Medium. Polymers (Basel). 2019;1043: , pp.1–12.

41 

T-H Nguyen, B-T Lee. . Fabrication and characterization of cross-linked gelatin electro-spun nano-fibers. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2010;03: , pp.1117–1124. , doi: 10.4236/jbise.2010.312145

42 

P Gomez-Romero, K Cuentas-Gallegos, M Lira-Cantu, N Casan-Pastor. . Hybrid nanocomposite materials for energy. J Mater Sci. 2005;40: , pp.1423–1428.

43 

J Bonastre, J Molina, JC Galvan, F Cases. . Characterization of polypyrrole/phosphotungstate membranes by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Synth Met. 2014;187: , pp.37–45. , doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2013.10.020

44 

M Omastova, M Trchova, J Kovarova, J Stejskal. . Synthesis and structural study of polypyrrole prepared in the presence of surfactants. Synth Met. 2003;138: , pp.447.

45 

HK Lim, SO Lee, KJ Song, SG Kim, KH Kim. . Synthesis and properties of soluble polypyrrole doped with dodecylbenzenesulfonate and combined with polymeric additive poly(ethylene glycol). J Appl Polym Sci. 2005;97: , pp.1170–1175. , doi: 10.1002/app.21824

46 

R Marcilla, C Pozo-Gonzalo, J Rodríguez, JA Alduncin, JA Pomposo, D Mecerreyes. . Use of polymeric ionic liquids as stabilizers in the synthesis of polypyrrole organic dispersions. Synth Met. 2006;156: , pp.1133–1138. , doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2006.08.001

47 

CF Hsu, L Zhang, H Peng, J Travas-Sejdic, PA Kilmartin. . Scavenging of DPPH free radicals by polypyrrole powders of varying levels of overoxidation and/or reduction. Synth Met. 2008;158: , pp.946–952. , doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2008.06.017

48 

R Kiefer, SY Chu, PA Kilmartin, GA Bowmaker, RP Cooney, J Travas-Sejdic. . Mixed-ion linear actuation behaviour of polypyrrole. Electrochim Acta. 2007;52: , pp.2386–2391. , doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.08.058

49 

R Kiefer, R Temmer, T Tamm, J Travas-Sejdic, PA Kilmartin, A Aabloo. . Conducting polymer actuators formed on MWCNT and PEDOT-PSS conductive coatings. Synth Met. 2013;171: , pp.69–75. , doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2013.03.017

50 

TF Otero, JG Martinez. . Artificial muscles: A tool to quantify exchanged solvent during biomimetic reactions. Chem Mater. 2012;24: , pp.4093–4099. , doi: 10.1021/cm302847r

51 

E Smela, N Gadegaard. . Volume change in polypyrrole studied by atomic force microscopy. J Phys Chem B. 2001;105: , pp.9395–9405. , doi: 10.1021/jp004126u

52 

RZ Pytel, EL Thomas, IW Hunter. . In situ observation of dynamic elastic modulus in polypyrrole actuators. Polymer (Guildf). 2008;49: , pp.2008–2013. , doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.053

53 

T Shoa, T Mirfakhrai, JDW Madden. . Electro-stiffening in polypyrrole films: Dependence of Young’s modulus on oxidation state, load and frequency. Synth Met. 2010;160: , pp.1280–1286. , doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.04.001

54 

R Khadka, N Aydemir, A Kesküla, T Tamm, J Travas-Sejdic, R Kiefer. . Enhancement of polypyrrole linear actuation with poly(ethylene oxide). Synth Met. 2017;232: , pp.1–7. , doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2017.07.011

55 

Z Zondaka, R Valner, T Tamm, A Aabloo, R Kiefer. . Carbide-derived carbon in polypyrrole changing the elastic modulus with a huge impact on actuation. RSC Adv. 2016;6: , pp.26380–26385. , doi: 10.1039/c6ra01511e

56 

JD Madden, D Rinderknecht, PA Anquetil, IW Hunter. . Creep and cycle life in polypyrrole actuators. Sensors Actuators, A Phys. 2007;133: , pp.210–217. , doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2006.03.016

57 

JD Madden, PG Madden, PA Anquetil, IW Hunter. . Load and time dependence of displacement in a conducting polymer actuator. Mater Res Soc Symp—Proc. 2002;698: , pp.137–144.

58 

L Valero, JG Martinez, TF Otero. . Creeping and structural effects in Faradaic artificial muscles. J Solid State Electrochem. 2015;19: , pp.2683–2689. , doi: 10.1007/s10008-015-2775-1


15 Apr 2020

PONE-D-20-03013

Concept of an artificial muscle design on polypyrrole nanofiber scaffolds

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr Rudolf Kiefer,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by 17/04/2020. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

    A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
    A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
    An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Susana Fernandes

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1.    Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this paper the authors report on experiments using fibre scaffolds.

It is not clear how many replicates the data are based upon an this should usefully be stated. Additionally, we have ambiguous error bars and use of the +/-: these can variously mean +/- sd; +/- s.e.m. or 95% CI for either data or the mean. All of these of course do depend on the number of data points contributing as well, either in terms of scale or accuracy. This could usefully be made clearer in the paper.

When describing something as changing, it is insufficient to rely solely on the numerical values - please apply a suitable test (presumably a paired one for before/after in the case of table 2).

How good is the fit of the linear model - given the potential for turning over (second derivative <0) in 4c, is a linear model justified mathematically (as opposed to statistically)?

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript is presented the synthesis and characterization of two novel conducting materials that have a high electro-chemo-mechanical activity based on glucose-gelatin nanofiber scaffolds coated with polypyrrole and doped with dodecylbenzensulfonate or with triflouromethanesulfonate. The experiments carried out in the manuscript are described in sufficient detail. The composition, electronic , ionic conductivity and the electro-chemo-mechanical activity was characterized by means of different characterization techniques. In my opinion, this manuscript is very interesting and the results, in addition to be well organized and discussed, they were compared and contrasted with literature data, being the conclusions presented supported by the reported data. Therefore, in my opinion, the manuscript is acceptable for publication as it is.

Reviewer #3: I have reviewed the research manuscript draft "Concept of an artificial muscle design on polypyrrole nanofiber scaffolds" written by Madis Harjo, Martin Järvekülg, Tarmo Tamm, Toribio F. Otero and Rudolf Kiefer submitted for publication in PLOS ONE.

After the reading of the manuscript, in my opinion it is an interesting work where the obtained results are reasonable well explained and could gives rise to a future research works in this line

Acceptable under minor revisions. Only I have few comments or suggestions.

1: Replace in the manuscript and supplementary information:

Madis Harjo1, Martin Järvekülg2, Tarmo Tamm1, Toribio F. Otero3, and Rudolf Kiefer4,*

by

Madis Harjo1, Martin Järvekülg2, Tarmo Tamm1, Toribio F. Otero3 and Rudolf Kiefer4*

2: In the abstract replace: triflouromethanesulfonate by trifluoromethanesulfonate

3: In the introduction, at the end of second paragraph: Comparable, without capital letter: comparable

4: Section 2.2: in the first (40ºC) and second paragraph (60ºC, 60ºC) replace de cero in superindex by degree symbol.

5: At the end of equation 3, 4 and 5, remove the comma, point and comma, respectively

6: Section 3.2.1, in first line of second paragraph: Figure 3b instead Figure 2b

7: Last line before section 3.2.2: “cycles ,” --> “cycles,”

8: Section 3.2.2 in first paragraph: “CFS-PPy/DBS” instead of “PPy/DBS”

9: Section 3.2.2 in the paragraph prior to Figure 5:

Revise the sentence “Figure 5a shows the linear dependence of the diffusion coefficients during the oxidation reaction (S2 Table) on the applied frequency (S3 Figure) depicts the evolution during reduction reactions)”

10: Section 3.2.2 first paragraph after Figure 5: “sentence” instead of “sentiency”.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Asier Martinez Salaberria

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.


21 Apr 2020

Reviewer #1: In this paper the authors report on experiments using fibre scaffolds.

We thank the reviewer for the useful comments and have revised our manuscript regarding the suggestions

It is not clear how many replicates the data are based upon an this should usefully be stated. Additionally, we have ambiguous error bars and use of the +/-: these can variously mean +/- sd; +/- s.e.m. or 95% CI for either data or the mean. All of these of course do depend on the number of data points contributing as well, either in terms of scale or accuracy. This could usefully be made clearer in the paper.

Yes, a good point! All the reported numeric results are mean values of at least triplicate experiments, not just repeats from the same sample but different specimens. The +/- represent (single) standard deviations. This information was reported in the end of section 2.3 but it has been rewritten to improve clarity:

Three different samples for each synthesized material were measured. The presented values represent means, reported together with standard deviations.

When describing something as changing, it is insufficient to rely solely on the numerical values - please apply a suitable test (presumably a paired one for before/after in the case of table 2).

The material property change is a very important consideration in any polymeric or soft material in general, even more so with conducting polymers that are known to have elastic modulus change during redox processes. However, we are not quite sure what to improve here, since the values in table 2 are already exactly what the reviewer appears to be suggesting – values of the modulus before and after actuation experiments. Since the measurement of the elastic modulus is a dynamic process in itself (relation between the applied force/weight and deformation), it cannot be done concurrently with the actuation measurement, just before and after.

How good is the fit of the linear model - given the potential for turning over (second derivative <0) in 4c, is a linear model justified mathematically (as opposed to statistically)?

We have to totally agree with the reviewer. The data points in figure 4c do not follow a linear trend too well. As stated in the text (hopefully more clearly now in the revised version), the linear fits were just presented as visual guides, as in ideal case, the linear relation between charge and strain is expected. However, real systems are seldom ideal and the coupling between charge/ion flux and volume change (strain) changes with driving frequency, as variation in solvation and various relaxations come to play.

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript is presented the synthesis and characterization of two novel conducting materials that have a high electro-chemo-mechanical activity based on glucose-gelatin nanofiber scaffolds coated with polypyrrole and doped with dodecylbenzensulfonate or with triflouromethanesulfonate. The experiments carried out in the manuscript are described in sufficient detail. The composition, electronic , ionic conductivity and the electro-chemo-mechanical activity was characterized by means of different characterization techniques. In my opinion, this manuscript is very interesting and the results, in addition to be well organized and discussed, they were compared and contrasted with literature data, being the conclusions presented supported by the reported data. Therefore, in my opinion, the manuscript is acceptable for publication as it is.

We thank the reviewer for supporting our work and the positive comments

Reviewer #3: I have reviewed the research manuscript draft "Concept of an artificial muscle design on polypyrrole nanofiber scaffolds" written by Madis Harjo, Martin Järvekülg, Tarmo Tamm, Toribio F. Otero and Rudolf Kiefer submitted for publication in PLOS ONE.

We thank the reviewer for his positive review and have correct our mistakes in the revised manuscript.

After the reading of the manuscript, in my opinion it is an interesting work where the obtained results are reasonable well explained and could gives rise to a future research works in this line

Acceptable under minor revisions. Only I have few comments or suggestions.

We thank the reviewer for finding the mistakes and suggestions to improve the manuscript.

1: Replace in the manuscript and supplementary information:

Madis Harjo1, Martin Järvekülg2, Tarmo Tamm1, Toribio F. Otero3, and Rudolf Kiefer4,*

by

Madis Harjo1, Martin Järvekülg2, Tarmo Tamm1, Toribio F. Otero3 and Rudolf Kiefer4*

Corrected.

2: In the abstract replace: triflouromethanesulfonate by trifluoromethanesulfonate

We have corrected this mistake in abstract.

3: In the introduction, at the end of second paragraph: Comparable, without capital letter: comparable

The term is corrected.

4: Section 2.2: in the first (40ºC) and second paragraph (60ºC, 60ºC) replace de cero in superindex by degree symbol.

We have replaced the superscript degree symbol.

5: At the end of equation 3, 4 and 5, remove the comma, point and comma, respectively

We have corrected equation 3-5 and removed comma and points

6: Section 3.2.1, in first line of second paragraph: Figure 3b instead Figure 2b

We thank the reviewer pointing this out and have corrected it

7: Last line before section 3.2.2: “cycles ,” --> “cycles,”

We have corrected this.

8: Section 3.2.2 in first paragraph: “CFS-PPy/DBS” instead of “PPy/DBS”

The term is corrected.

9: Section 3.2.2 in the paragraph prior to Figure 5:

Revise the sentence “Figure 5a shows the linear dependence of the diffusion coefficients during the oxidation reaction (S2 Table) on the applied frequency (S3 Figure) depicts the evolution during reduction reactions)”

We agree and have reformulated

Figure 5a shows the linear dependence of the diffusion coefficients during the oxidation reaction on the applied frequency. The diffusion coefficients upon reduction against the applied frequency are shown at S3 Figure.

10: Section 3.2.2 first paragraph after Figure 5: “sentence” instead of “sentiency”.

We thank the reviewer pointing that out and have corrected it.

Submitted filename: response to reviewer.docx

23 Apr 2020

Concept of an artificial muscle design on polypyrrole nanofiber scaffolds

PONE-D-20-03013R1

Dear Dr. Kiefer,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it complies with all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you will receive an e-mail containing information on the amendments required prior to publication. When all required modifications have been addressed, you will receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will proceed to our production department and be scheduled for publication.

Shortly after the formal acceptance letter is sent, an invoice for payment will follow. To ensure an efficient production and billing process, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, you must inform our press team as soon as possible and no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

With kind regards,

Susana Cristina de Matos Fernandes

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:


28 Apr 2020

PONE-D-20-03013R1

Concept of an artificial muscle design on polypyrrole nanofiber scaffolds

Dear Dr. Kiefer:

I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximize its impact. If they will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

For any other questions or concerns, please email plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE.

With kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Susana Cristina de Matos Fernandes

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

https://www.researchpad.co/tools/openurl?pubtype=article&doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0232851&title=Concept of an artificial muscle design on polypyrrole nanofiber scaffolds&author=Madis Harjo,Martin Järvekülg,Tarmo Tamm,Toribio F. Otero,Rudolf Kiefer,Susana Cristina de Matos Fernandes,Susana Cristina de Matos Fernandes,Susana Cristina de Matos Fernandes,Susana Cristina de Matos Fernandes,&keyword=&subject=Research Article,Physical Sciences,Physics,Electricity,Electric Conductivity,Engineering and Technology,Mechanical Engineering,Actuators,Physical Sciences,Chemistry,Physical Chemistry,Ions,Anions,Physical Sciences,Chemistry,Chemical Physics,Mass Diffusivity,Physical Sciences,Physics,Chemical Physics,Mass Diffusivity,Physical Sciences,Chemistry,Chemical Reactions,Oxidation,Physical Sciences,Chemistry,Chemical Reactions,Oxidation-Reduction Reactions,Physical Sciences,Chemistry,Electrochemistry,Oxidation-Reduction Reactions,Biology and Life Sciences,Bioengineering,Biomimetics,Engineering and Technology,Bioengineering,Biomimetics,Physical Sciences,Chemistry,Chemical Reactions,Polymerization,Physical Sciences,Chemistry,Polymer Chemistry,Polymerization,