ResearchPad - Review and Exam Preparation https://www.researchpad.co Default RSS Feed en-us © 2020 Newgen KnowledgeWorks <![CDATA[Process Matters]]> https://www.researchpad.co/product?articleinfo=5bfaa656d5eed0c48473a6bf

Researchers who study nursing education encounter difficulty when trying to recruit and retain nurse educator participants. Researchers would benefit from knowing more about effective and ineffective sampling strategies and methods to increase the efficiency of the research process. This article outlines the struggles and successes encountered with a mixed methods study that examined nurse educators’ critical thinking. Specific examples are interwoven with current literature to uncover some important insights and future recommendations for researchers in nursing education.

]]>
<![CDATA[Student perception of workplace-based assessment]]> https://www.researchpad.co/product?articleinfo=5add6868463d7e355c48453a

Background

Workplace-based assessment (WPBA) is key to medical education, providing a framework through which the trainee can be assessed and receive feedback in the clinical setting.

WPBA was introduced in 2008–2009 to students in year 4 at University College London Medical School (UCLMS). Students raised concerns about the lack of standardisation in grading. As a result, white-space areas were introduced on WPBA forms. The aim of this was to permit assessors to expand their feedback, thereby enhancing its developmental potential. The aim of the project was to assess student perception of WPBA at UCLMS, and to determine whether re-designing the form had altered this perception.

Students raised concerns about the lack of standardisation in grading

Figure 4

Method

An online survey was circulated to students in year 4 at the end of the academic year 2009–2010, and was repeated with the next cohort of year–4 students at the end of the academic year 2010–2011. Students were asked to express a level of agreement with 12 statements and for free-text comments on their experience with WPBA. Survey responses were analysed using an unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test, and QSR NVivo was used to manage the thematic analysis of the free-text comments.

Results

Although there was no significant difference in student perception between cohorts, the analysis of free-text comments highlighted several themes for discussion.

Conclusion

Students at UCLMS find WPBA valuable in highlighting areas for improvement and obtaining personalised feedback. They find the grading of WPBA too subjective, and that the attitudes of the assessors sometimes reduce its educational value. Suggestions are made to improve the value of WPBA in undergraduate medical education.

]]>